Originally posted by Bosse de NageA newspaper shouldnt' be on ANY side....
First, why would the CSR be on the Palestinian side, rather than the Israeli?
Second, that story was first published in the Independent, a British newspaper. It's been widely republished since -- the Independent must have a syndication deal with the CSR amongst others -- like www.haaretz.com, currently featuring a nice banner ad inviting you to 'me ...[text shortened]... ectacularly stupid comments or will you be going to spank yourself in the Irrelevant Forum?
The Israeli Bedouins shouldn't have to pick a side.
For those of you who left your point-catching glove at home, all they have to do in the middle east is stop killing each other.
Simple solution.
Then draw a line in the sand. This is your land, that is your land. And here's some cash to compensate you for your land loss.
But oh no, these guys would rather kill each other than live next to each other. They've had a Million peace deals offered to them but none of them are good enough.
And i'm the one who's stupid??
The fact that this is even a thread speaks to the stupidity of the situation.
Every "incident" MUST be debated. Every action by one side must have a "RESPONSE" by the other side.
It's like a chess game, except in this game every time a piece is captured you put a new piece back on the board. The game will never end that way!
Why can't these guys just agree to a draw?
Originally posted by uzlessWould YOU agree to a draw in this debate thread?
The fact that this is even a thread speaks to the stupidity of the situation.
Every "incident" MUST be debated. Every action by one side must have a "RESPONSE" by the other side.
It's like a chess game, except in this game every time a piece is captured you put a new piece back on the board. The game will never end that way!
Why can't these guys just agree to a draw?
I REST MY CASE!
GRANNY.
Originally posted by RedmikeI did not accuse you of going ad hominen.
Just thought it was funny to hear you accuse someone else of being obsessed with another poster.
And then you accuse me of going ad hominem.
🙄
Sorry for not writing correctly. I said I can (and like to) go ad hominem with you, because it is easy.
Everybody knows I am not a debater. Actually, I suck at it. That is why I always go on personal attacks, specially against you when you pop in just to say your pot-kettle everytime I post something, and mainly because it is so easy, since you are a frustrated old man with a fantastic communist political career... in a defeated bye election, lol!
Originally posted by SeitseYou are so moronic you make me stutter.
I did not accuse you of going ad hominen.
Sorry for not writing correctly. I said I can (and like to) go ad hominem with you, because it is easy.
Everybody knows I am not a debater. Actually, I suck at it. That is why I always go on personal attacks, specially against you [b]when you pop in just to say your pot-kettle everytime I post something, and ...[text shortened]... d old man with a fantastic communist political career... in a defeated bye election, lol![/b]
2 edits
Originally posted by smw6869weak case there buddy. Comparing decades of killing to an internet debate?
Would YOU agree to a draw in this debate thread?
I REST MY CASE!
GRANNY.
I'm suggesting stopping the killing, the other side are suggesting continuing the killing.
Where is the draw in that??🙄
Originally posted by uzlessDon't you think it's easier to call a draw in a debate forum than call a draw in a war that's been going on for 60 years, buddy?
weak case there buddy. Comparing decades of killing to an internet debate?
I'm suggesting stopping the killing, the other side are suggesting continuing the killing.
Where is the draw in that??🙄
GRANNY.