@Suzianne saidWhatever you say. So, if that is your interpretation, is Colonel Marauder saying that if Moonbus owns a business, that he should NOT have the power to decide what the people who actually do the work get paid?
Maybe you could try to read his post again.
It's less about 'owning a business' and more about a boss having 'unlimited power to decide what the people who actually do the work should get paid.'
I also believe that workers should own the means of production.
Start another thread on 'workers owning the means of production', I would find it impossible to even write a coherent opening line for such a premise. I would love to chime in, though..
On this post, though, Moonbus does own the business. Subject to the law, can he not decide how much to pay.....pay the job? Pay the worker?
@AverageJoe1
I guess you forgot about federal and state minimum wage requirements.
I bet something YOU hate doing. Those BASTARDS, getting 20 bucks an hour, I hope they fry.
@sonhouse saidSonhouse, did you accuse me yesterday about not being able to 'comprehend' posts?
@AverageJoe1
I guess you forgot about federal and state minimum wage requirements.
I bet something YOU hate doing. Those BASTARDS, getting 20 bucks an hour, I hope they fry.
Do you not comprehend my post heretofore, where I utter these exact words? "SUBJECT TO LAW, can he not decide......"
Ohhhhh sonhouse, maybe I do need to run up there and square you away......
Now, as to your penance, would you answer that post, heretofore? (Cool word, I use it when it is passable)
@sonhouse saidDam, you dig deeper.
@AverageJoe1
Ok, tell me what law you are talking about? Slave labor? child labor?
What is the subject of the post? It is The mini-issue of the thread......Right, it is the division of the budgeted pay. Pay. Amount of money. WHO decides how much is paid to whom.
It is not about slaves or children or the labor of the slaves or the children.
That being the case, we are discussing pay, and my phrase said "subject to the law OF PAYMENT TO WORKERS". Do not be like Sue and pretend you did not naturally discern that.
Better to say, I get it now, and save face.
Now please answer my question, heretofore?
@AverageJoe1
YOU lost it way back when you defended Trump killing the border bill which was BTW, BIPARTISIN but Trump HATED the idea of Biden getting any credit for putting up that bill so the squeaker of the house Mikey fell over and played dead, bill in the trash can where not even DEBATE was allowed,
Yep, repubs EXTREMELY anxious to deal with the border.
BULL CRAP. They could care less about the border situation or Mikey would have put that bill to a vote.
Political expediency trumps border issues.
GREAT JOB repubs.
America is a nation of immigrants.
Immigrants are what made America great, whether they came uninvited or were trafficked as slaves.
Now the descendants of those immigrants want exclusive use of the land they invaded.
You won't make America great again by keeping out the new blood which revitalised the nation.
@sonhouse saidYour post is so stupid and unbelievable. Border Bill? Who said what to Whom???
@AverageJoe1
YOU lost it way back when you defended Trump killing the border bill which was BTW, BIPARTISIN but Trump HATED the idea of Biden getting any credit for putting up that bill so the squeaker of the house Mikey fell over and played dead, bill in the trash can where not even DEBATE was allowed,
Yep, repubs EXTREMELY anxious to deal with the border.
BULL CRAP. T ...[text shortened]... would have put that bill to a vote.
Political expediency trumps border issues.
GREAT JOB repubs.
Follow me, you stupid goose. Here are the steps to close the border. Watch closely, some real sleight of hand here. Jesus. Here are the steps. And all the people , th senate, the legislator......why, you can cast all that aside. Readyt.
Follw me here.
Step #1: Biden sit at Oval office. Get out piece of paper, Write 'Shut the Border totally down, let no one in."
That's it. Now, can you agree, or tie that in to your stupid post above? I am losing faith in your sense. Just stupid. YOu would agree, but....but...yo do not want it shut down.
Why not?
@AverageJoe1
You must have an atrocious memory if you don't remember the border bill, bipartisan bill BTW, BOTH REPUBS and DEMS wrote it, passed it to the house and Trump CONTROLS the house because Mike Johnson is in Trump's back pocket and Trump didn't want Biden to get credit for ANY kind of bill about the border so ordered Johnson to kill it and he did, not even allowing debate on it much less a vote, directly into the trash. That is EXACTLY what happened but I imagine you would be trying to rewrite history and erase that incident from the minds of republicans, but republicans lost the right to be called republicans right after Trump became POTUS the first time, it is now 100% Trumplican party now.
@sonhouse saidYou just wrote about Repubs, Dems, Mike Johnson, and Trump, who you threw in for a bit of color.
@AverageJoe1
You must have an atrocious memory if you don't remember the border bill, bipartisan bill BTW, BOTH REPUBS and DEMS wrote it, passed it to the house and Trump CONTROLS the house because Mike Johnson is in Trump's back pocket and Trump didn't want Biden to get credit for ANY kind of bill about the border so ordered Johnson to kill it and he did, not even allowing ...[text shortened]... lled republicans right after Trump became POTUS the first time, it is now 100% Trumplican party now.
But this is one of your harebrained posts, don't you see. We've read it. But it has nothing, NOTHING, to do with...........follow me here...
Biden gets out a piece of paper, writes 'close the border', hands it to his staff, and ...upstairs to bed. Did you not read my post@!!!!!!!!!
@sonhouse saidBcause, for my point of view, and from yours, there is no need for a bilol. He signs and goes to bed.
@AverageJoe1
Then tell me why there is no border bill, which BTW ran into billions.
Since there is no need for a bill, we need not be concerned with a bill. Sonhouse,,,,,,there would not BEEEEEE one, so what is that all about that you keep writing that that is about what you are writing about. Getting dizzy
@sonhouse saidWhy would a lib like you care about he cost of something. I think the tuition will cost about 1000 times that. One trillion is 1000 times a billion i am told.
@AverageJoe1
Then tell me why there is no border bill, which BTW ran into billions.
Silly guy you are
@AverageJoe1
What are you on here? Are you stoned? I was talking about billions released to help with the border but your orange traitor killed that bill.
This is one of the few links that don't say turn off your adblock but this is about that subject:
https://democrats.org/news/fact-check-just-like-jd-vance-mike-johnson-tanked-the-bipartisan-border-deal-at-trumps-command/
@sonhouse saidEveryone, this was Sonhouse's answer to an issue which was clearly about 'the power of a company owner to decide how much to pay his workers"". It is THAT simple, about 8 clicks back.
@AverageJoe1
YOU lost it way back when you defended Trump killing the border bill which was BTW, BIPARTISIN but Trump HATED the idea of Biden getting any credit for putting up that bill so the squeaker of the house Mikey fell over and played dead, bill in the trash can where not even DEBATE was allowed,
Yep, repubs EXTREMELY anxious to deal with the border.
BULL CRAP. T ...[text shortened]... would have put that bill to a vote.
Political expediency trumps border issues.
GREAT JOB repubs.
Look here at what he wrote back after I buried him.
I would still like for him and Marauder to prepare a brief explaining about the power, or the lack thereof, that a company can, or cannot, exercise in determining salaries.
This response of SHouse is so typical of libs who will not answer questions. His treatment of this issue would qualify as one of my perfect analogies.