Go back
U.S. conservatives defend-the right to bear fat

U.S. conservatives defend-the right to bear fat

Debates

Bad wolf

Joined
23 Jul 05
Moves
8869
Clock
24 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
If it was "practical", you'd be all for it?

I have a solution: the State could take away all children from their parents and feed them a diet approved by State experts. Would that be okey dokey with you?
Interesting thought...
I'd consider it, yeah, why not, but I don't think it would be worth the effort.

M
Steamin transies

Joined
22 Nov 06
Moves
3265
Clock
24 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bad wolf
Interesting thought...
I'd consider it, yeah, why not, but I don't think it would be worth the effort.
???????

You would consider every child being parentless? Or having some sort of government assigned parents instead?

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
24 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Merk
???????

You would consider every child being parentless? Or having some sort of government assigned parents instead?
It makes sense; obviously parents can't be trusted with feeding their kids properly so the State clearly has to intervene. Of course, we could just make it a felony to feed your kids over a certain amount of trans fat or whatever a month; a few beheadings of parents who obviously don't care about their child's well-being might have a significant deterrent effect.

Bad wolf

Joined
23 Jul 05
Moves
8869
Clock
24 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Merk
???????

You would consider every child being parentless? Or having some sort of government assigned parents instead?
Man, I'm a pragmatist, I'll consider anything.

M
Steamin transies

Joined
22 Nov 06
Moves
3265
Clock
24 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
It makes sense; obviously parents can't be trusted with feeding their kids properly so the State clearly has to intervene. Of course, we could just make it a felony to feed your kids over a certain amount of trans fat or whatever a month; a few beheadings of parents who obviously don't care about their child's well-being might have a significant deterrent effect.
Lol! All fat parents be hanged! Maybe we could have gubmint run fat farms.

Bad wolf

Joined
23 Jul 05
Moves
8869
Clock
24 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
It makes sense; obviously parents can't be trusted with feeding their kids properly so the State clearly has to intervene. Of course, we could just make it a felony to feed your kids over a certain amount of trans fat or whatever a month; a few beheadings of parents who obviously don't care about their child's well-being might have a significant deterrent effect.
What is so wrong on comtemplating on it though?

Disregarding anything, without even considering it, is very limiting.
How can you fully understand your reasons for something unless you consider them?

Bad wolf

Joined
23 Jul 05
Moves
8869
Clock
24 Apr 07
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Merk
I'm a big idea guy. I'll leave the details to my detail people.

I'm thinking it would be reasonable to send a small pamphlet home with school kids. Something with a little bit of general information about the benifits of good health vs. the drawbacks of poor health.
You know, like all the skinny kids playing outside with huge smiles on their faces and all ...[text shortened]... cise routines, quick meal ideas, something that list the calories in foods, blah, blah, blah.
Sounds good, I would do more, but I wonder if many more people would actually listen; part of me doubts it.

Could perhaps television broadcasts on it be used?
We have the BBC, which is very useful for this, but I don't think you have anything similar...

N

The sky

Joined
05 Apr 05
Moves
10385
Clock
24 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
So you want the government to monitor what parents feed their children?
I wouldn't want the government to monitor what parents feed their children, but I would want them to monitor the children's health. I don't believe it's the parents' right to let a child starve, and I believe that the government should intervene if this is happening. If a child is overweight to a degree which causes serious health problems, I would see that as a similar situation which would require some form of intervention. The vast majority of parents wants the best for their children, but some may lack the necessary knowledge, skills, time and/or money to give the children what they need. I don't see an intervention as limiting the parents' freedom, but rather as enabling them to be the good parents they want to be.

Bad wolf

Joined
23 Jul 05
Moves
8869
Clock
24 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
I wouldn't want the government to monitor what parents feed their children, but I would want them to monitor the children's health. I don't believe it's the parents' right to let a child starve, and I believe that the government should intervene if this is happening. If a child is overweight to a degree which causes serious health problems, I would see that ...[text shortened]... the parents' freedom, but rather as enabling them to be the good parents they want to be.
Yes, I totally agree with you here noodles. 🙂

m

Joined
13 Jul 06
Moves
4229
Clock
24 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

For those who want to skim through a WHO report: http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/globalization.diet.and.ncds.pdf
Companies like McDonalds and Coca Cola the sell processed food damage a nation's health when they start selling there.
Is there a difference now to when the British crippled China with opium?

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
24 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bad wolf
True, are you advocating teaching programs for the parents now?

Clearly in no way is it the kid's fault, they need some kind of protection, from the parents or from the advertisements, either seems fine to me really, as long as this problem gets sorted.
I advocate such programs. Educating the populace is the first and often only thing the government should do in dealing with widespread social concerns.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26758
Clock
24 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Merk
I'm a big idea guy. I'll leave the details to my detail people.

I'm thinking it would be reasonable to send a small pamphlet home with school kids. Something with a little bit of general information about the benifits of good health vs. the drawbacks of poor health.
You know, like all the skinny kids playing outside with huge smiles on their faces and all ...[text shortened]... cise routines, quick meal ideas, something that list the calories in foods, blah, blah, blah.
Make sure the fit kids have lots of cute guys and girls being affectionate.

h

Joined
03 Feb 07
Moves
9221
Clock
24 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Merk
I'm a big idea guy. I'll leave the details to my detail people.

I'm thinking it would be reasonable to send a small pamphlet home with school kids. Something with a little bit of general information about the benifits of good health vs. the drawbacks of poor health.
You know, like all the skinny kids playing outside with huge smiles on their faces and all ...[text shortened]... cise routines, quick meal ideas, something that list the calories in foods, blah, blah, blah.
Only problem with the pamphlet is that the fat kids would probably eat it on the way home. Maybe use diet pamphlet paper

Bad wolf

Joined
23 Jul 05
Moves
8869
Clock
24 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
I advocate such programs. Educating the populace is the first and often only thing the government should do in dealing with widespread social concerns.
Indeed, I agree, some would argue that the system would be biased a certain way and they wouldn't like it; some comprimise would have to be met.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89790
Clock
24 Apr 07
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Merk
It's not the governments job to protect people from themselves.
I do believe I actually agree with you for once.

Unless we're talking children, psychiatric patients or mentally handicapped people...obviously...

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.