Go back
Why does NY think feds should give them money?

Why does NY think feds should give them money?

Debates

Earl of Trumps
Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
20526
Clock
10 Sep 23
1 edit

@AverageJoe1
I am right, you know I am right. Earl, are you saying we need to overlook our poor and feed and house these new citizens? Earl?
---------------------------

No. but Libs all think that illegal immigrants are more worthy than destitute American so all illegals will get taken care of.

Earl of Trumps
Pawn Whisperer

My Kingdom fora Pawn

Joined
09 Jan 19
Moves
20526
Clock
10 Sep 23

@wildgrass said
Big government solutions coming from the libertarian?
I have to think in terms of us not being a libertarian society/government, and suggest things that are realistic.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89930
Clock
10 Sep 23

@averagejoe1 said
Then why not decide how many foreigners we will allow to immigrate, and simply vet them and let them in? A one-sentence policy. Joe said he would reform the policy, but has not done so. I could do it, why don't they call me?. I will get Trump to replace Majorkis with me.
Yeah… a political heavy weight such as yourself is exactly what your country needs.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54897
Clock
10 Sep 23

@wildgrass said
...and left out an O-ring and bent the floater

Incompetent right? Never hire that person again. Or at least don't refer to him as a good plumber.
Ha. You get a B+ for that observation. But the issue is that Joe the Plumber made it worse. Two bad plumbers.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54897
Clock
10 Sep 23

@shavixmir said
Yeah… a political heavy weight such as yourself is exactly what your country needs.
I am anything but political, I am more like Trump. Surely you don't want a politician. Biden has been a politician from day one and look where there that gets us.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89930
Clock
10 Sep 23

@averagejoe1 said
I am anything but political, I am more like Trump. Surely you don't want a politician. Biden has been a politician from day one and look where there that gets us.
You don’t want a politician as a leader?
You want someone like trump? A lying weasle of a man, who can’t run a bloody business?

What you need in a leader is someone who listens to advice from professionals, someone who helps steer a process; only gives an own opinion when asked, summarizes situations and only makes decisions when there’s a deadlock.

Sort of like a professional chairman in a meeting.

Indeed, someone who can step beyond his own politics and indulge in deep democracy (google it, if you’re not familiar with the concept).

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54897
Clock
10 Sep 23

@shavixmir said
Yeah… a political heavy weight such as yourself is exactly what your country needs.
No, no, no, no no what this country needs is someone to run it like a man of common sense. That of course would mean restricting immigrants at the border. Am I wrong?

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54897
Clock
10 Sep 23

@shavixmir said
You don’t want a politician as a leader?
You want someone like trump? A lying weasle of a man, who can’t run a bloody business?

What you need in a leader is someone who listens to advice from professionals, someone who helps steer a process; only gives an own opinion when asked, summarizes situations and only makes decisions when there’s a deadlock.

Sort of like a pr ...[text shortened]... his own politics and indulge in deep democracy (google it, if you’re not familiar with the concept).
Why didn’t you tell us you graduated from college, with a masters degree in political science . You make it look so easy. Oh, is that what Biden does? Ha ha ha. Can you just see Biden putting his foot down? Ha ha ha.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89930
Clock
10 Sep 23

@averagejoe1 said
Why didn’t you tell us you graduated from college, with a masters degree in political science . You make it look so easy. Oh, is that what Biden does? Ha ha ha. Can you just see Biden putting his foot down? Ha ha ha.
Uhuh.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54897
Clock
10 Sep 23

So does everyone notice that in 8 pages, the libs gave not one to-the-point coherent answer?
I think Trump was mentioned, though, which I think is a requirement with which I am unfamiliar.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89930
Clock
11 Sep 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

@averagejoe1 said
So does everyone notice that in 8 pages, the libs gave not one to-the-point coherent answer?
I think Trump was mentioned, though, which I think is a requirement with which I am unfamiliar.
Some choices lead to expenses. And sometimes you need those expenses paid.

People choose to live in Texas or on a flood plain or in an area frequented by hurricanes.
That does not mean to say that when the proverbial poop hits the rotating blade of doom, that the federal government shouldn’t step in to help.

Much like a wife who stays with the man who batters her. Don’t you think the hospital should help her?

There’s an answer for you.
Do you like it?

Wajoma
Die Cheeseburger

Provocation

Joined
01 Sep 04
Moves
78933
Clock
11 Sep 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

@shavixmir said
Some choices lead to expenses. And sometimes you need those expenses paid.

People choose to live in Texas or on a flood plain or in an area frequented by hurricanes.
That does not mean to say that when the proverbial poop hits the rotating blade of doom, that the federal government shouldn’t step in to help.

Much like a wife who stays with the man who batters her. Don’t you think the hospital should help her?

There’s an answer for you.
Do you like it?
People who live in high risk areas should not be subsidized for when the inevitable happens.

Can't anyone else see the obvious? This is so crystal clear it hurts your eyes. You're encouraging people to live in high risk areas, you're taking money from this who considered the safety of themselves and their property and you're giving it to the reckless and careless, you're encouraging bad behavior. This is too blatantly obvious to be called an 'unintended consequence' for some unfathomable reason you want to encourage people to live in dangerous areas. That is your goal, but the motivation can never be explained.

shavixmir
Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
89930
Clock
11 Sep 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

@wajoma said
People who live in high risk areas should not be subsidized for when the inevitable happens.

Can't anyone else see the obvious? This is so crystal clear it hurts your eyes. You're encouraging people to live in high risk areas, you're taking money from this who considered the safety of themselves and their property and you're giving it to the reckless and careless, you're ...[text shortened]... age people to live in dangerous areas. That is your goal, but the motivation can never be explained.
So, people in cities shouldn't be subsidized when a car accident happens? Or they get lung cancer from pollution?

The most fertile soil is where? We are just not gonna grow crops on it?

Really. Sometimes it's like someone opened a bucket of stupid and you tumbled out.

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54897
Clock
11 Sep 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

@shavixmir said
Some choices lead to expenses. And sometimes you need those expenses paid.

People choose to live in Texas or on a flood plain or in an area frequented by hurricanes.
That does not mean to say that when the proverbial poop hits the rotating blade of doom, that the federal government shouldn’t step in to help.

Much like a wife who stays with the man who batters her. Don’t you think the hospital should help her?

There’s an answer for you.
Do you like it?
Ohhh Shav...
YOur first sentence is pitiful. I chose to buy KeyCorp in January and it is down over 20%. My 'choice',.....you suggest that I need that expense to be paid? By the govt, assume.? People choose sex with out protection, their choice. Choice is a big deal. We agree.
No, you must mean the govt pay for national disasters, not for my stock loss. Yeah, there are govt provisions to do just that, but we all know that, so what are you talking about?
If my neighbor beats me up and my wife takes me to the hospital, are you saying they should spend their time and money fixing me up without charging me? Yes, you are saying that, which ain't gonna happen. If my wife beats me up and my neighbor drives me to the hospital I will have to pay the hospital to fix me up. Are you ACTUALLY saying, for us all to see, that the 'hospital should help me'?
Oh, Shav....

AverageJoe1
Catch the Train 47!

Lake Como

Joined
27 Jul 10
Moves
54897
Clock
11 Sep 23
Vote Up
Vote Down

@shavixmir said
So, people in cities shouldn't be subsidized when a car accident happens? Or they get lung cancer from pollution?

The most fertile soil is where? We are just not gonna grow crops on it?

Really. Sometimes it's like someone opened a bucket of stupid and you tumbled out.
Good God Almighty. Did you not say above that people 'Choose'? If I choose to live on the coast, I could get blown away, and you want other citizens (thru govt) to pay for it??!???!???!???!???!?!

No, I should not be 'subsidized' if I have a car accident. Boy, your faerie land little country concepts have ruined you. Taking off a few days for country drive today? Has someone actually hired you? To do what!!>>!?@$@?#E

And why do you name only 'lung cancer' from pollution? I am getting deaf from all the noise in the city, should the govt pay for my dr and my hearing aids?

Oh Shav.....

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.