Originally posted by KazetNagorraWhat I am saying is that unwanted children have a greater chance of later becoming criminals
No, that's not what I am saying. What I am saying is that unwanted children have a greater chance of later becoming criminals. It is not true that densely populated areas always have high crime rates.
says who?
Originally posted by FMFSo you support this right up until the child is birthed or do you support laws on the books prohibiting abortions after so many weeks of development?
I support a woman's right over her own body, her fertility and her right to choose. And yet I have no stake whatsoever in the "abortion industry", nor am I one of its "constituents". Indeed, I can hardly imagine personally being involved in terminating a pregnancy, as I said earlier in this thread. But this does not affect my pro-choice stance. So your clumsy attempt to link what I support to "big bucks" is a dud, I'm afraid.
Originally posted by generalissimoI support a woman's right to choose, regardless of how much that disgusts you. Believe me, this is a far more serious and grown up issue than can be affected by churlish insults on an internet forum. As I have stated quite clearly, I could scarcely be described as a person who supports abortions - given the facts of my own life and experience. My hypothetical preference is for there to be no terminations. Failing that, I would prefer to see them happen as early as possible. But I favour laws that assert a woman's right to choose by allowing them up until about 20-22 weeks. Beyond that I am personally very uncomfortable. However, in what is clearly a very difficult area, I believe that neither my discomfort nor your disgust should affect the pro-choice stance of the law. The likes of you and me should channel our energies into preventing abortions not criminalizing them.
but you do support abortions at any time before that.
you disgust me.
Originally posted by generalissimoLet's break this down. You and I disagree about whether a fertilized egg (at any stage) is a living human. You take the position that at ANY stage abortion is murder.
don't you think rape changes the whole situation?
I mean, its not like it was the woman's fault, since it was something that was forced on her.
I believe that we shouldn't go around allowing abortions in cases where the people involved acted irresponsibly, but in cases where the woman was forced to do something against her will, it would be unde ...[text shortened]... urder, there is no question about that, but sometimes you have to do it for the greater good.
You are actually saying murdering a baby just because the mother was raped is for the "greater good"?
Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperOf course the major flaw in this particular argument is that killing a human is not always murder. Murder is unlawfully killing a human under some circumstances. "Abortion is murder" is like saying "borrowing a spoon is theft".
Let's break this down. You and I disagree about whether a fertilized egg (at any stage) is a living human. You take the position that at ANY stage abortion is murder.
You are actually saying murdering a baby just because the mother was raped is for the "greater good"?
Originally posted by FMFI support a woman's right to choose, regardless of how much that disgusts you
I support a woman's right to choose, regardless of how much that disgusts you. Believe me, this is a far more serious and grown up issue than can be affected by churlish insults on an internet forum. As I have stated quite clearly, I could scarcely be described as a person who supports abortions - given the facts of my own life and experience. My hypothet es of you and me should channel our energies into preventing abortions not criminalizing them.
I know.
Believe me, this is a far more serious and grown up issue than can be affected by churlish insults on an internet forum
another spontaneous remark.
As I have stated quite clearly, I could scarcely be described as a person who supports abortions - given the facts of my own life and experience
I see.
My hypothetical preference is for there to be no terminations
thats good to hear.
But I favour laws that assert a woman's right to choose by allowing them up until about 20-22 weeks. Beyond that I am personally very uncomfortable. However, in what is clearly a very difficult area, I believe that neither my discomfort nor your disgust should affect the pro-choice stance of the law. The likes of you and me should channel our energies into preventing abortions not criminalizing them.
but the problem is that they don't usually care, if one wants an abortion one will have an abortion, regardless of what you tell them. It doesn't matter how much energy you put into preventing it, at the end its their choice and its likely they'll do as they wish.
What methods of prevention are you proposing? contraception? you and I know that once a woman gets pregnant and she doesn't want the baby (and she has the freedom to have an abortion), its too late to talk about contraception.
Originally posted by generalissimoSomewhere in amongst this drivel of yours you seem to be inadvertently acknowledging that you understand the meaning of "a woman's right over her own body, her fertility and her right to choose".
but the problem is that they don't usually care, if one wants an abortion one will have an abortion, regardless of what you tell them. It doesn't matter how much energy you put into preventing it, at the end its their choice and its likely they'll do as they wish.
Originally posted by FMFI never said I didn't understand what that meant, I said I didn't totally agree with it.
Somewhere in amongst this drivel of yours you seem to be inadvertently acknowledging that you understand the meaning of "a woman's right over her own body, her fertility and her right to choose".