why wasn't Al Gore arrested?

@averagejoe1 said
Marauder says above that DOJ 'told the sec that he was committing a crim offense....." Marauder dares give credence to a government department that is up to its ears in miscues, to say the least.
What a laugh. The Forum is abound with dead air.

The DOJ didn't say it; Trump did.

@no1marauder said
I did to, you lying POS.

Prove it. Post it now you lying POS!

@metal-brain said
Prove it. Post it now you lying POS!

GFY. Go back to the thread you started a month ago. " Democrats hate ......... " page 1.

@no1marauder said
GFY. Go back to the thread you started a month ago. " Democrats hate ......... " page 1.

It does not exist and you know it. Post it here or stop lying!

@metal-brain said
It does not exist and you know it. Post it here or stop lying!

You're clinically insane. It's right there on Page 1 of YOUR thread!

@metal-brain said
It does not exist and you know it. Post it here or stop lying!

Actually the thread is most probably:

Thread 197543

Please moderate your langauge. People might think, that you not to be taken seriously if you automatically accuse everybody of a lie....

And you set the bar for your self very high.

@no1marauder said
You're clinically insane. It's right there on Page 1 of YOUR thread!

If it is so easy to find post it here.

@metal-brain said
If it is so easy to find post it here.

Look at the post previous to yours.

It was easy to find anyway.

@averagejoe1 said
Our pres is not a king, marauder.

Does he (Trump) know?

Otheriwse people should tell him....

@metal-brain said
Why do you think it was a threat?
At risk of what? You don't have any specifics.

It seems like you just want to believe that. That was the narrative you were fed from your party so you defend the nonsense. Who did Trump threaten and with what? Just being on the wrong side of history would have consequences. Right?

But this is Marauder, have to take him with a grain of salt. He is the same guy who recognizes Not One Glimmer of wrongdoing with the Biden Consortium. Disingenous of the highest order.

@metal-brain said
Prove it. Post it now you lying POS!

Was on my phone which is cut and paste unfriendly (or at least it is to me). But it's right there in the middle of Page 1 of the thread I said:

"Except you left out the fact that by the time Congress met to certify the election, a judge ordered recount had already been conducted and showed Kennedy the winner in Hawaii. " On December 27, Circuit Judge Ronald B. Jamieson ruled that the presidential election in Hawaii was won by President-elect Kennedy by a 115 vote margin."

http://www.leinsdorf.com/how_kennedy_won_hawaii.htm

@averagejoe1 said
Sorry, cannot for the life of me buy such a plan of action against the sec of state for just doing nothing. You imply that Trump at that time could tell him 'what to do'. Our pres is not a king, marauder.
I have never seen so much dead air on the forum.

You guys are seriously hilarious; you insist that Biden is behind the prosecution of Trump yet here say it's impossible for a President to get his DOJ to pursue criminal charges against a State official!

The mind really reels.

Trump said Raffensberger was committing a "criminal offense" by not "finding" him the votes needed to flip the election and that this put him and his lawyer "at risk". Pray tell, Joe, what does that mean to you?

@metal-brain said
Then why were the alternate electors allowed to do it in 1960? They were not charged with a crime. Is the election result the only reason?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1960_United_States_presidential_election_in_Hawaii

Al Gore conceded. Trump didn't. It has nothing to do with crimes. All you have are allegations of crimes, no convictions. Besides, Al Gore is anothe ...[text shortened]... led. The Rockefellers are behind the global warming movement along with their cohort Maurice Strong.

It's well documented. I think the recount in 1960 was court ordered, which is the obvious distinction between what happened then and this, which was the illegal version.

@wildgrass said
The "alternate" electors were fake and clearly illegal since they only existed because of the lies.

Al Gore was not arrested because he didn't commit crimes. Trump did. It's got nothing to do with free speech.

What makes them illegal? The election was contested.

The prosecutor investigating possible illegal meddling in the 2020 election in Georgia has agreed to immunity deals with at least eight Republican alternate electors who signed a certificate stating that then-President Donald Trump had won the state. If what they did was illegal why were they granted immunity in the Georgia election probe?

@no1marauder said
Was on my phone which is cut and paste unfriendly (or at least it is to me). But it's right there in the middle of Page 1 of the thread I said:

"Except you left out the fact that by the time Congress met to certify the election, a judge ordered recount had already been conducted and showed Kennedy the winner in Hawaii. " On December 27, Circuit Judge Ronald B. Jamieson ...[text shortened]... t-elect Kennedy by a 115 vote margin."

http://www.leinsdorf.com/how_kennedy_won_hawaii.htm

ere is an excerpt from your link:

"On November 17, however, Nixon's electors were certified the winners when the final official tally gave the Republican a 141 vote margin.

The Democrats decided to demand a recount of the results of the election and the Republicans and Lieutenant Governor agreed not to contest the Democrats' petition.

The Democrats then filed suit in Circuit Court charging voting irregularities in 198 of Hawaii's 240 precincts. They claimed 1,283 ballots were unaccounted for in the final tabulation."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nixon was in the lead when democrats demanded a recount, then democrats filed suit in Circuit Court charging voting irregularities in 198 of Hawaii's 240 precincts. They claimed 1,283 ballots were unaccounted for in the final tabulation.

They were both contested elections. I fail to see your point. And if it is illegal for alternate electors to do what they did why would there be a need for the Electoral count act?

https://www.cardin.senate.gov/news/u-s-senate-bills-would-ban-fake-electors-clear-up-electoral-college-procedures/