General
13 Dec 16
Originally posted by chaney3Suzianne has been threatening to leave the site for years, long before you were here, and for a multitude of reasons mostly related to some level of paranoia. A couple of years ago she stated to the Spirituality forum that she was leaving because she honestly believed there was a conspiracy between all the atheists to drive her away. It's all become much of a muchness over time.
"You have totally eliminated my desire to remain on this site".
"You've not made my experience here over the last six months a happy one".
"I used to love this site. Thanks for ruining it for me".
I am very thankful that I do not know anyone in my life who is as horrible a person as you have been to me during these last six months".
FMF, th ...[text shortened]... t you have your part to play in this. Or.....continue avoiding this, and talk more about 'onus'.
Originally posted by divegeesterwhy not? nothing compelled him to share it, did it. A hand did not arise from his monitor
The simple matter in case here is that if you send a PM to someone, like the one you did to FMF, you cannot seriously expect the recipient to keep it to themselves.
and command him to share it. What a silly argument you are making.
He has shown himself to be a two faced, untrustworthy, insensitive, unethical, morally
repugnant old cad of the lowest order and the best part is, he did it all by himself. Don't
you just love it when a witch hunt backfires. I know I do.
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieNothing "compelled" Suzianne to abuse the web site's message facility. Nothing "compelled" me to not block her and to leave the door open to her to use the same facility with more decency in future. Nothing "compelled" sonhouse and chaney3 to make fools of themselves with their bizarre name calling. Nothing compelled you to try your "compelled" catchphrase/buzzword umpteen times in the last 48 hours when it's just meaningless repetition of a dud idea. 😉
why not? nothing compelled him to share it, did it. A hand did not arise from his monitor and command him to share it, What a silly argument you are making.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI guess it's all a matter of opinion, but I can tell you unequivocally that if you or any of the other unprincipled blowhards in here send me a PM like that, I reserve my freedom of choice to post it in the forums if I wish to.
why not? nothing compelled him to share it, did it. A hand did not arise from his monitor
and command him to share it. What a silly argument you are making.
He has shown himself to be a two faced, untrustworthy, insensitive, unethical, morally
repugnant old cad of the lowest order and the best part is, he did it all by himself. Don't
you just love it when a witch hunt backfires. I know I do.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou sound like you see yourself as being on a bit of a witch hunt of your own, robbie, and yet pretending to not like them. What witch hunt am i conducting? What action do you think I am advocating against Suzianne? Answer: None.
He has shown himself to be a two faced, untrustworthy, insensitive, unethical, morally
repugnant old cad of the lowest order and the best part is, he did it all by himself. Don't
you just love it when a witch hunt backfires. I know I do.
Originally posted by FMFhttps://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tDNCkcC47eQ
Nothing "compelled" Suzianne to abuse the web site's message facility. Nothing "compelled" me to not block her and to leave the door open to her to use the same facility with more decency in future. Nothing "compelled" sonhouse and chaney3 to make fools of themselves with their bizarre name calling. Nothing compelled you to try your "compelled" catchphrase/buzzword umpteen times in the last 48 hours when it's just meaningless repetition of a dud idea. 😉
(Html link wouldn't work)
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI understand how, with your viewpoint, you arrive at everything on the list above, except "two faced" which sounds like you just added it to the list without a reason.
He has shown himself to be a two faced, untrustworthy, insensitive, unethical, morally
repugnant old cad of the lowest order ...
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
Originally posted by sonhouseSo are you retracting your 'pre-qualifier' argument?
I mis-read it. Long day at work. .
'If you ever come near me,....I will hurt you,' Would indeed validate the idea of a justified pre-qualifier to the threat.
However, 'and if I am ever unfortunate enough to meet you,...I will hurt you,' can't really be viewed in the same manner.
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by divegeesterI would not send you so much as a snotty handkerchief, you are blocked from all private correspondence for the very reason that like your master, you cannot be trusted, fear not you shill of a man.
I guess it's all a matter of opinion, but I can tell you unequivocally that if you or any of the other unprincipled blowhards in here send me a PM like that, I reserve my freedom of choice to post it in the forums if I wish to.