@Suzianne

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I meant to add forked tongued as well and apologise for the omission.

Where have I said one thing when I meant something different? You're just being silly. There is obviously some room to criticize me if one takes a certain viewpoint on the whole situation, and if one is inclined to defend Suzianne's behaviour, but just making stuff up and adding it to lists is nothing more than you being daft.

Originally posted by FMF
Where have I said one thing when I meant something different? You're just being silly. There is obviously some room to criticize me if one takes a certain viewpoint on the whole situation, and if one is inclined to defend Suzianne's behaviour, but just making stuff up and adding it to lists is nothing more than you being daft.

You claim that you were under no duress to keep the correspondence private. Your justification for doing so was that it contained what you term abusive material. Logically therefore it seems to me that you are stating that somehow the abuse compelled or caused you to share it, a nonsense argument, thus your self justification is nothing more than forked tongued speech because we both know the real reason that you shared it was to vilify Suzianne, the alleged abuse simply being a poor excuse. Forked tongued is therefore very apt for a snake like you.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
You claim that you were under no duress to keep the correspondence private. Your justification for doing so was that it contained what you term abusive material. Logically therefore it seems to me that you are stating that somehow the abuse compelled or caused you to share it, a nonsense argument, thus your self justification is nothing more than f ...[text shortened]... ed abuse simply being a poor excuse. Forked tongued is therefore very apt for a snake like you.

This is simply unfunny made-up nonsense, robbie. Do you really think you are being witty or funny? You're just trotting out your silly cliche-strewn stupidities yet again. You just regurgitate the same little spoof-riffs time and time again. I wasn't "compelled" to do anything. And you are not being "compelled" to make your facetious ersatz-morality "gags". There is an issue here, and rather than discuss it, you just resort to spewing out repetitive lists of parody arguments, epithets, and the same old same old ad hominems.

Originally posted by FMF
This is simply unfunny made-up nonsense, robbie. Do you really think you are being witty or funny? You're just trotting out your silly cliche-strewn stupidities yet again. You just regurgitate the same little spoof-riffs time and time again. I wasn't "compelled" to do anything. And you are not being "compelled" to make your facetious ersatz-morality "gags". The ...[text shortened]... ewing out repetitive lists of parody arguments, epithets, and the same old same old ad hominems.

Sorry but you keep trotting out all kinds of hackneyed deflection techniques none of which are very effectual. 'you are trying to hard to be funny', 'is this your new buzz word', etc etc, nothing but smoke and mirrors from a charlatan.

You were not compelled nor under duress to reveal anything. The idea that because it contained abuse was justification in itself is therefore nonsense. The real reason was that you wanted to vilify Suzianne. You are a forked tongued snake. Solid, sound, logical and evidential.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
You were not compelled nor under duress to reveal anything. The idea that because it contained abuse was justification in itself is therefore nonsense. The real reason was that you wanted to vilify Suzianne. You are a forked tongued snake. Solid, sound, logical and evidential.

You've just repeated the same nonsense yet again. You simply trot out the same parody rubbish every time an ethical issue arises. Don't you have any other routine you can try out?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Sorry but you keep trotting out all kinds of hackneyed deflection techniques none of which are very effectual. 'you are trying to hard to be funny', 'is this your new buzz word', etc etc, nothing but smoke and mirrors from a charlatan.

You can't want people to think you are serious. The only explanation of how you react to every single ethical issue with the same kinds of concocted satirical riffs is that you see yourself as a clown. It can only be attempted comedy ~ when you dig yourself into a hole you often then start saying that you were only clowning. It's just that we haven't got the stage yet where you realize you look like a boring fool, and so you start wittering on about how you are only a "raggedy clown" and were only being a "devils' advocate" in order to "explore ideas". Over an dove rand over again. You even tried to extract "humour" from child sex abuse and black people being lynched in the US, only later to declare that you were just joking.

Originally posted by FMF
You've just repeated the same nonsense yet again. You simply trot out the same parody rubbish every time an ethical issue arises. Don't you have any other routine you can try out?

oh dear more smoke and mirrors from our resident forked tongued snake dancing charlatan.

you were not compelled - this you have publicly admitted. You cannot therefore use the abuse as justification for revealing its source, not reasonably, not logically and your insistence that you can is therefore self evidentially nonsense. You can cry about it all you like, but it it what it is. That makes you a forked tongued snake, because here you are attempting to tell us, it was the abuse, I was under no compulsion to keep the abuse secret when all along you were under no compulsion to reveal its source either, making your self justification nonsense! and you a forked tongued charlatan.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you were not compelled - this you have publicly admitted. you cannot therefore use the abuse as justification for revealing its source, not reasonably, not logically and your insistence that you can is therefore self evidentially nonsense. You can cry about it all you like, but it it what it is. That makes you a forked tongued snake, because here ...[text shortened]... u were under no compulsion to reveal its source either, making your self justification nonsense.

You've just repeated the parody analysis - replete with the exact same word strings - for ... what is it... the fourth time, fifth time, sixth time?

Originally posted by FMF
You've just repeated the parody analysis - replete with the exact same word strings - for ... what is it... the fourth time, fifth time, sixth time?

and you still seem unable to grasp its meaning or is more probable unwilling because it demonstrates what a snake you are, oh dear why not do a card trick instead or pull something else from out under your sleeve.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
and you still seem unable to grasp its meaning, oh dear why not do a card trick instead or pull something else from out under your sleeve.

😀😀😀 Well done robbie! Ha ha ha. LOL. Such an intellectual maverick. Ha ha ha. LOL. What would any serious issue be without your "raggedy clown" thing? 😀😀😀

Originally posted by FMF
😀😀😀 Well done robbie! Ha ha ha. LOL. Such an intellectual maverick. Ha ha ha. LOL. What would any serious issue be without your "raggedy clown" thing? 😀😀😀

wow a conjuring trick!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
it demonstrates what a snake you are...

Yeah yeah... snake, pussy, assshole, pansy, homo, dipshlt, liar, cad, coward, disgusting, pedophile, licking scrotums, predator, evil, mentally ill, slime, stalker, morally repugnant blah blah blah ... what a ever-so-funny and principled bunch Suzianne's vociferous supporters are. 😉

Originally posted by FMF
Yeah yeah... snake, pussy, assshole, pansy, homo, dipshlt, liar, cad, coward, disgusting, pedophile, licking scrotums, predator, evil, mentally ill, slime, stalker, morally repugnant blah blah blah ... what a ever-so-funny and principled bunch Suzianne's vociferous supporters are. 😉

a good sum up but you forgot his hilarious zombie hordes crybaby vulgar poster routine
robbie the alcoholic fake JW i wonder if hes ever posted the truth on here

Originally posted by roma45
robbie the alcoholic fake JW i wonder if hes ever posted the truth on here

Interesting. Is this a view that some of the stalwarts on the Clans Forum have arrived at?

Originally posted by divegeester
All social websites discourage what you did Suzianne, I.e. Sending and abusive message then blocking the recipient. Facebook has algorithms in place to prevent this. Your email is completely out of order and if you had sent it to me I would have published in every forum under a new thread. Your lack of personal responsibility and accountability in this matter is astonishing.

It was ONE throwaway line in an entire post, the purpose of which seems to elude both you and him. But this is what you forum neanderthals do. It's probably the only way you can manage having a point to your derision at all.

But yeah, we've all seen your posts in this thread about how much value you and he place on forum friendships. None. Zero. We get it. And you.

So excuse me for not cutting you any slack on this one. You and he need a course on empathy and actually understanding people.