General
13 Dec 16
16 Dec 16
"You have totally eliminated my desire to remain on this site".
"You've not made my experience here over the last six months a happy one".
"I used to love this site. Thanks for ruining it for me".
I am very thankful that I do not know anyone in my life who is as horrible a person as you have been to me during these last six months".
FMF, this is how Suzianne feels. Instead of being your normal self, why don't you take pause and reflect on the fact that your words to her, and your exchanges with her, have resulted in these feelings.....which as she pointed out, preferred not to state publicly.
Be a man, and digest the fact that you have your part to play in this. Or.....continue avoiding this, and talk more about 'onus'.
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by chaney3"You have totally eliminated my desire to remain on this site".
"You've not made my experience here over the last six months a happy one".
"I used to love this site. Thanks for ruining it for me".
I am very thankful that I do not know anyone in my life who is as horrible a person as you have been to me during these last six months".
FMF, this is how Suzianne feels. Instead of being your normal self, why don't you take pause and reflect on the fact that your words to her, and your exchanges with her, have resulted in these feelings.....which as she pointed out, preferred not to state publicly.
Be a man, and digest the fact that you have your part to play in this. Or.....continue avoiding this, and talk more about 'onus'.
She's just lashing out. She's been delivering self-possessed diatribes on the forums, many of them aimed at me, for years, and has done so at the expense of being a normal member of the community. The stuff you've quoted - well, she's said it umpteen times in various sneering words to that effect on the forums.
Whether her glass chin and substance-free discussion-trashing tirades are genuine and sincere or merely a calculated melodramatic attention-seeking affectation - maybe she doesn't really know herself. But I have no doubt. I have come to the conclusion it's the latter.
Just listen to this preening, paranoid rubbish, in her very own words, from the self-same daft-and-nasty message under scrutiny...
I've had many opponents during my time at RHP, but most of them are now gone. None of them ever beat me, but you have succeeded. I don't know anything about you, but I suspect that you have experience, probably as a politician, in exploiting the words of others, experience that I do not have. I have no more desire to fight you. You have made every tool at my disposal ineffective. You have out maneuvered me and have managed to slime your way to victory.
If you want to indulge her in all this tasteless chowder of vanity and victimhood, be my guest. 😉
Originally posted by FMFI mis-read it. Long day at work. You're still an assshole.
He either deliberately or accidentally misrepresented the content of your message. He appeared to be quoting from a text. If someone gave him that text and set him off with his foolish name-calling antics last night (my time), then he was manipulated by someone. There's nor better word to describe it. The reason why the content of your message and your behaviour was not entitled to my cooperation in keeping it shrouded in secrecy is not "minutia".
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by chaney3Er... nope. I think I'll pass on any lecture on the subject of walking talking adulthood from a poster, like you, who thinks calling people "gay" and a "sissy" on a grown ups' message board [because he disagrees with them] is a 'manly' way to acquit himself. Thanks all the same. 🙄
Be a man...
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by Very RustyIs there a new vital idea or point buried in this same-as-countless-prior-posts offering from you? I don't think so.
That is only because in your mind your are so much smarter, in fact in your mind you are smarter than everyone. You see, that is how I see your attitude to be. Yes, I would tell you the same thing in person. You have NOT learned a damn thing have you?
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by SuzianneThe simple matter in case here is that if you send a PM to someone, like the one you did to FMF, you cannot seriously expect the recipient to keep it to themselves.
Did you really actually ignore 98% of my PM to focus on one sentence so that you could begin this narcissistic tirade and finger-pointing?
Did you really miss how I really had to swallow my pride to even send you that message in the first place?
Unbelievable.
No, I certainly will not be sending you any more PMs. But not for the reason you think. It's because you have no empathy for others. It would be like putting lipstick on a pig.
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by SuzianneAll social websites discourage what you did Suzianne, I.e. Sending and abusive message then blocking the recipient. Facebook has algorithms in place to prevent this. Your email is completely out of order and if you had sent it to me I would have published in every forum under a new thread. Your lack of personal responsibility and accountability in this matter is astonishing.
In your own words:
**whoosh**
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by SuzianneAll this rhetoric from you is obfuscation.
Sonhouse is like me, and most Americans, we paraphrase on occasion to more quickly get our point across. You focus on minutia so that you have something to deride. You also start talking about 'manipulation' in order to get him to doubt himself.
This is 'gaslighting', and you do it all the time. I keep telling you that you need new tricks because we'v ...[text shortened]... u out already, but you ignored what I said again, probably in your haste to deride someone else.
The simple matter in case here is that if you send a PM to someone, like the one you did to FMF, you cannot seriously expect the recipient to keep it to themselves.
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by divegeesterThat's the same. Ventriloquism is an old art form in which you are the
FMF didn't point out your "scrotum licking" post, I did. And as for costing Russ money, both FMF and I are subscribers you are not. In fact you actively encourage people not to subscribe.
puppet and FMF's hand moves your lips.
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by SuzianneThat a small group of cronies in this forum wish harm to come to FMF and in fact some have stated they wish to do him harm personally (you included as a matter of fact), is completely irrelevant.
What I actually did not expect was for him to shoot himself in the foot over it.
"Abuse" and "Threats". After years of what you guys have been pulling on these forums? Please.
You are demonstrably what you oppose, an online aggressive bully who sends abusive PMs to people, then blocks them from replying. You got called out over it and quite rightly so. Your behaviour in this matter reveals you to be a hypocrite. Imagine if FMF had sent you that PM...good grief you would be crying about it for years.
The simple matter in case here is that if you send a PM to someone, like the one you did to FMF, you cannot seriously expect the recipient to keep it to themselves.
Originally posted by SuzianneWhat has FMF's empathetic capacity got to do with anything? Absolutely nothing, this is just more tub-thumping from you. Wether you or anyone else likes or dislikes FMF due to any lack of empathy on his part is completely irrelevant. The reason this an other threads are going on and on and on about this topic is because people are making it personal rather than looking at the facts.
YOU HAVE NO EMPATHY. YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW REAL PEOPLE FEEL ABOUT ANYTHING.
Can you hear me now?
The simple matter in case here is that if you send a PM to someone, like the one you did to FMF, you cannot seriously expect the recipient to keep it to themselves.
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by josephwDo you still think it was right for FMF to share the PM?
Perhaps I misunderstood what you meant by "fluffed" because what I said wasn't intended as a "blow" in the first place.
Obviously there are some here who intend to land "blows". Perhaps because they view themselves as superior to others.
Or maybe it's all just part and parcel of the whole debate process.