General
13 Dec 16
Originally posted by josephwOriginally posted by Suzianne
[b]You really have no idea what I've been talking about today, do you?
Originally posted by FMF
On the contrary, I think I have been constant and clear today ~
Suzianne didn't ask you whether or not you were "constant and clear".
Perhaps if you weren't so focused on yourself you would have a better idea of what Suzianne has been saying.
Perhaps if you weren't so focused on landing one of your fluffed blows, you'd have understood the dynamic of the question and response above. I think I have quite obviously been both constant and clear about what Suzianne has been talking about today. 😉
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by FMFFMF,
People should just say what they have to say in public and otherwise simply leave people they're tempted to harass alone, and certainly shouldn't be thinking they can use the web site's facility to attempt to lambast them in "secret", regardless of how laughable the efforts to do so are.
You are of course including yourself in this are you? What about the 17 messages you sent me? How do you think everyone would have responded to those.... Well actually you sent 21 I just deleted the other four, as you were getting more silly with each P.M.
Starting out there was no one better than me, and I was a very intelligent person in your opinion. Into the P.M.'s when I wasn't agreeing with what you had to say you started with the name calling.
You claim you are sick, don't know if that is true or not. IF it is, perhaps it is the heavy medication you must be taking that makes you so two-faced!!
You see I put it out there for everyone to see. I am not the least bit concerned about you, or anyone else. Well..I wouldn't go out of my way to stir up shortcircuit. I also would disagree with him if I felt the need to. I am not a YES man at all.
-VR
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by divegeesterDive,
How does it feel that with the entire RHP forum contributors reading these threads, that the core support you get is from the likes of Carrobie, Chaney3 and Seitse?
That is not quite correct there is also me, I think I have made a few contributions also. I also told you my stance on the situation. I believe she has the support of many others also afraid to voice their opinions because of the back lash they will get from little v. Of course he knows that is of no concern to me, actually tried to get me on his side.
-VR
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by Very RustyFMF,
You are of course including yourself in this are you? What about the 17 messages you sent me? How do you think everyone would have responded to those.... Well actually you sent 21 I just deleted the other four, as you were getting more silly with each P.M.
Starting out there was no one better than me, and I was a very intelligent person in your opinion. Into the P.M.'s when I wasn't agreeing with what you had to say you started with the name calling.
You claim you are sick, don't know if that is true or not. IF it is, perhaps it is the heavy medication you must be taking that makes you so two-faced!!
You see I put it out there for everyone to see. I am not the least bit concerned about you, or anyone else. Well..I wouldn't go out of my way to stir up shortcircuit. I also would disagree with him if I felt the need to. I am not a YES man at all.
-VR
Ha ha. I see what you did there. 🙂
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by FMFFluffed? I think I made a direct hit. But that's just my opinion. Just like it's just your opinion that you "think" you have "been both constant and clear about what Suzianne has been talking about today."
Perhaps if you weren't so focused on landing one of your fluffed blows, you'd have understood the dynamic of the question and response above. I think I have quite obviously been both constant and clear about what Suzianne has been talking about today. 😉
The truth is is that what Suzianne has been talking about has been focused and deliberate. What is unclear has been your replies.
My opinion.
Originally posted by FMFDo you really think sexual harassment is going to help win your Jihad on a women?
I can hear you. But this notion about "real people" that you trot out over and over and over again is nonsense. Just because you feel rubbed up the wrong way by me because I will not be browbeaten by your perma-scorn forum persona has got absolutely nothing to do with "real people" this or "real people" that. You are just a blowhard on a message forum and one of ...[text shortened]... ns give you access to these "real people" that other people - like me for instance - don't have.
Originally posted by FMFWell I guess it depends on how you read it. What if I took offense to it and sent it out to 20 Mongrel Mob members because I thought you were keeping this sexual abuse hidden on an internet forum?
I really can't say, but ~ while you're asking me stuff ~ yes, I have stopped beating my wife. 😛
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by josephwYes I made the comment because I think your attempted blows missed the mark and were ineffectual. That's why I used the word "fluffed", which means flubbed or fumbled. Maybe it's a vocabulary thing. My English is of the British variety.
Just remember it was you that made the "fluffed blows" comment.
16 Dec 16
FMF: OK, josephw, also noted. Thanks for your input.I'm thanking you for your input into this discussion, josephw. I'm sorry if omitting the words "into this discussion" caused you to have to ask me why I was thanking you.
Originally posted by josephw
Why are you thanking me? It's an open forum, and I don't recall you asking me for my input.
16 Dec 16
Originally posted by Executioner BrandYou should do whatever you feel you ought to do and then, presumably, you will get your answer to the "What if" question you have posed.
What if I took offense to it and sent it out to 20 Mongrel Mob members because I thought you were keeping this sexual abuse hidden on an internet forum?