@torunn saidThe man who designed Titanic was on board when it sank.
If these two vessels had been manned only by people who had designed them and were willing to put their own lives at stake, I wouldn't mind
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Andrews
The man who owned the cruise line was also onboard but he survived.
@divegeester saidI have read a lot about the Titanic and watched many documentaries, one of which quite recently raising new theories as to what caused the tragedy. The fact that the designer and the owner were onboard does not, in my opinion, change the fact that it was a construction that wasn't ready for passengers.
The man who designed Titanic was on board when it sank.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Andrews
The man who owned the cruise line was also onboard but he survived.
01 Jul 23
@torunn saidTitanic sank because it was massively holed below the waterline by an iceberg. This could have happened to any ocean liner. Are you suggesting that all ocean liners at that time were “experimental”?
I have read a lot about the Titanic and watched many documentaries, one of which quite recently raising new theories as to what caused the tragedy. The fact that the designer and the owner were onboard does not, in my opinion, change the fact that it was a construction that wasn't ready for passengers.
01 Jul 23
@divegeester saidTitanic sank because of its wrong design - there were several flaws and construction mistakes, human errors also. It would not have happened to any other ocean liner.
Titanic sank because it was massively holed below the waterline by an iceberg. This could have happened to any ocean liner. Are you suggesting that all ocean liners at that time were “experimental”?
@divegeester saidThat's right, but they were not designed the same way as Titanic and were not designed as unsinkable.
Nonsense; lots of ships have been lost due to then having iceberg collisions.
Edit: We are no ship designers or technicians - my conclusions are those I have had from several documentaries, some recent, and discussing it further wouldn't give anything.
01 Jul 23
@torunn saidOne could almost think you are suggesting that the Titanic, with its new design, was steered into an iceberg because they thought the ship was an experiment in unsinkability. But giving that impression is not deliberate on your part, right? It's certainly not how the story goes.
That's right, but they were not designed the same way as Titanic and were not designed as unsinkable.
@fmf saidOf course not, it is not how the documentaries described it, but there were several reasons - design and construction - that might not have become obvious in such an unfortunate way, had it not been for the unthinkable: that the unsinkable ship sank.
One could almost think you are suggesting that the Titanic, with its new design, was steered into an iceberg because they thought the ship was an experiment in unsinkability. But giving that impression is not deliberate on your part, right? It's certainly not how the story goes.
01 Jul 23
@fmf saidI think you are alone in thinking that.
One could almost think you are suggesting that the Titanic, with its new design, was steered into an iceberg because they thought the ship was an experiment in unsinkability. But giving that impression is not deliberate on your part, right? It's certainly not how the story goes.
” We place absolute confidence in the Titanic. We believe the boat is unsinkable.”
White Star Line Vice President P.A.S. Franklin
01 Jul 23
@torunn saidBut the Titanic was not designed to withstand the type of damage that it sustained from its collision. So rather than being an experiment, I think it was just a good design undermined, catastrophically, by awful seamanship.
Of course not, it is not how the documentaries described it, but there were several reasons - design and construction - that might not have become obvious in such an unfortunate way, had it not been for the unthinkable: that the unsinkable ship sank.
@fmf saidFMF, my understanding of the unfortunate tragedy is what I have from documentaries, recent and older, nothing to discuss.
But the Titanic was not designed to withstand the type of damage that it sustained from its collision. So rather than being an experiment, I think it was just a good design undermined, catastrophically, by awful seamanship.
01 Jul 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI alone made the ironic comment, that much is true.
I think you are alone in thinking that.