27 Apr 08
Originally posted by no1marauderYou keep butting your head against these paper-thin walls, and sometimes it gets irritating.
If an Eddie Murphy SNL skit is unacceptable, then you're aiming for the average 13 year old Amish kid.
Considering the content of some of your posts, your scolding tone here is rank hypocrisy. That also goes for a few other Mods in this thread.
You seem to be unable to understand the 'censorship' here, so I gave you the low-down. Sorry if my 'tone' hurt your feelings.
The fact of the matter is SNL has an age restriction, does it not? The posts were alerted and I removed them, because of the content.
I know you are against any censorship, but there are young kids here and I'm sure there are people who may/have chosen this site because of the 'Family Site' and 'Work Safe' label it carries.
These people depend on some level of moderation, so you need to understand and respect that.
27 Apr 08
Originally posted by PhlabibitThe point remains, you can no longer say, "[he would] have us believe he really IS black" when [for months now] there have been pics of him and forum discussions that show otherwise available on, or through this site [there is a direct link to RHP faces in the 'community' menu, plus photos from the London meet-up] without looking silly.
Logic?
He changed his original RHP Faces image to a doctored image of him being black, and denied being white for a long time before you came to RHP.
I've now gone to RHP faces and see he's put some new images up. That's grand, but it changes nothing on this subject and your logic is based on ignorance of things that have gone on long before you ca ...[text shortened]... ven if Kirks was black, it would still be removed. It was negative content.
P-
27 Apr 08
Originally posted by SwissGambitAgain, you are depending on new users or unfamiliar users to follow links. I've already said that's not my major point anyway.
The point remains, you can no longer say, "[he would] have us believe he really IS black" when [for months now] there have been pics of him and forum discussions that show otherwise available on, or through this site [there is a direct link to RHP faces in the 'community' menu, plus photos from the London meet-up] without looking silly.
The point remains, RHP is not the place for racial stereotyping and Kirk's posts will continue to be removed regardless of his skill color.
P-
27 Apr 08
Originally posted by PhlabibitSo...
Again, you are depending on new users or unfamiliar users to follow links. I've already said that's not my major point anyway.
The point remains, RHP is not the place for racial stereotyping and Kirk's posts will continue to be removed regardless of his skill color.
P-
No Irish jokes then? No stingy Scottish jokes then?
What if you're subtly taking the piss out of stereotypes?
And is it only racial stereotyping which isn't allowed? What about gender stereotyping?
And where's the end of the line on this cracker then?
27 Apr 08
Originally posted by shavixmirIrish and Scottish aren't a race. Race has to do with skin colour, not nationality.
So...
No Irish jokes then? No stingy Scottish jokes then?
What if you're subtly taking the piss out of stereotypes?
And is it only racial stereotyping which isn't allowed? What about gender stereotyping?
And where's the end of the line on this cracker then?
27 Apr 08
Originally posted by kirksey957Strip clubs don't let 13 year old kids in.
That brings up a good question. You have an internet site that has a degree of moderation, yet there exists private forums where anything goes. To me it is kind of analogous to a strip club that has regulations that the dancers can't be nude and there can be no touching, but they have the "Champagne Room" where anything goes. Is there something wrong w ...[text shortened]...
Actually I think you have to pay extra for the "Champagne Room." So I've heard anyway.
27 Apr 08
Originally posted by pawnhandlerLook at your (you = the site, not marauder) student Bad wolf. He's absorbed every sexual innuendo and link that you've thrown at him. Has he developed a healthy sexuality? Nope. We get lots of threads with his obsession with it, along with other youth saying you should go out and basically screw everything in sight. There isn't a lot of talk about safe sex, respecting oneself and one's partner, its role in a loving relationship, keeping it in perspective, etc
The Venus is a historical work of art, and has value in that context. Playboy's context is the intent to sexually arouse.
The course in recognizing and preventing child sexual abuse I took discussed the grooming that happens prior to the act (in cases in which the perp is known, as opposed to stranger danger). One of the first steps in the groomin ...[text shortened]... t it, and pretending that allowing more sexual images is going to change that is bogus.
Do you even read his posts? He claims to restrain himself out of principle all the time. What's unhealthy about his sexuality? Unless you think bisexuality is unhealthy, or that teenage boys obsessed with sex are unhealthy, I can't see where you're coming from.