27 Apr 08
Originally posted by pawnhandlerPlayboy has become a historical work of art.
The Venus is a historical work of art, and has value in that context. Playboy's context is the intent to sexually arouse.
The course in recognizing and preventing child sexual abuse I took discussed the grooming that happens prior to the act (in cases in which the perp is known, as opposed to stranger danger). One of the first steps in the groomin ...[text shortened]... t it, and pretending that allowing more sexual images is going to change that is bogus.
27 Apr 08
1 edit
Originally posted by epic0002I'm from Los Angeles. TJ is well known to us. However I've only ever been there once, with my parents, and if I had seen a 13 year old stripper I probably would have been intimidated by the older woman in question.
Now I know you go there and see the little girls.. just by the way you said "TJ".🙂
27 Apr 08
Originally posted by PhlabibitAnd how hard is it to follow links when the links are consistently given in discussion after discussion on this topic? How do you think a relative n00b like me [as you seem to think] was able to find them?
Again, you are depending on new users or unfamiliar users to follow links. I've already said that's not my major point anyway.
The point remains, RHP is not the place for racial stereotyping and Kirk's posts will continue to be removed regardless of his skill color.
P-
27 Apr 08
Originally posted by SwissGambitYou give everyone too much credit if you think they are as smart as you or me.
And how hard is it to follow links when the links are consistently given in discussion after discussion on this topic? How do you think a relative n00b like me [as you seem to think] was able to find them?
P-