General
10 Dec 04
19 Dec 04
Originally posted by DualSpaceI think greyeyes has proven that the theory, "computers are stupid at corresponance while the best humans could easily beat them" is completely false. Greyeyes pited Fievel against Fritz, Fievel has a rating of almost 2200 on the site, Fritz right now is demolishing him, and opened up the game with a positional "human" sacrefice. Computers have improved a lot the past 5 years, a lot of ppl seem to be forgeting that.
Evidence is undeniable? fritz?! you have or know fritz?! woodley has lost so many games i've lost count. his wins, or as his chart has so heroically climbed has been against 1100-1500 players. Perhaps we need some light shed on fritz, since you know fritz software so well. Perhaps, chessmaster 10,000 will enlighten us. Because if any of you were using suc ...[text shortened]... hines are stupid in correspondence, unless, you could shed some more bitter light on fritz.
20 Dec 04
Originally posted by mateulosewell, why is jw a meer 1700 then? and remeber that 2000 is the "average" USCF rating...
I think greyeyes has proven that the theory, "computers are stupid at corresponance while the best humans could easily beat them" is completely false. Greyeyes pited Fievel against Fritz, Fievel has a rating of almost 2200 on the site, Fritz right now is demolishing him, and opened up the game with a positional "human" sacrefice. Computers have improved a lot the past 5 years, a lot of ppl seem to be forgeting that.
21 Dec 04
Originally posted by geniuswell, why is he about to get the BIG boooot, genius?
well, why is jw a meer 1700 then? and remeber that 2000 is the "average" USCF rating...
'Anyway, let me say this...I could be making an executive decision and removing someone from the site prior to the introduction of game mods. No prizes for guessing...
-Russ'
Why did he resign both these games genius? Game 776193 and Game 776194.
Its called trying to be a smart cheat. Never win games too far above your rating, and people mightn't get sus. Luckily for us, our snotty nosed friend doesn't have the mental capabilities of a piece of dung and completely botched his cover up attempts.
D
21 Dec 04
1 edit
Originally posted by geniusWhen I continue to see posts like this, covering points that have been explained ad nauseum, I seriously start to despair of the future of the human race. ONE MORE TIME: JW played for 6 months here with a rating no higher than 1200. In that time he played about 400 games. It takes a lot of time and a lot of games to raise your rating 500 points, but JW did it in less than 2 months by winning virtually every game he played. If people hadn't publicized his cheating so that he felt it necessary to lose a few games in a laughable attempt to cover up his misdeeds, in all probability he'd be over 2000 by now. And the USCF is not comparable to the RHP rating; last I knew the average rating on this site was in the low 1200's (where JW was never able to get to even with 50+ or so "games" with ian93).
well, why is jw a meer 1700 then? and remeber that 2000 is the "average" USCF rating...
24 Dec 04
okay:
(1) merry christmas guys, i love you all and competitive play
(2) I left Pawn Stars
(3) no hard feelings on previous posts
(4) nakamura is kicking ass!
(5) as I said, kasparov's book on fischer looks like a winner. you know my mailing address, it's 35 bucks on Amazon. do the right thing. 😛
seriously, merry christmas and for those 'move in 1 day' games you know i'm going into my time bank.
take care!