15 Feb 16
Originally posted by divegeesterGe dude id rather you didn't consider my underpants not with your record of overt leg humping posts, please its a family site.
I think your best course of action is to back out now while today's fresh underpants are still covering some of you indiscretion.
15 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieGHOST HUNTER has taken a cue from your banter and made the more explicit allegations. I don't recall you actually using the words pervert etc.
Where have i claimed that you could not be trusted with children
where have i termed you a pervert?
where have i termed you a pedophile?
Out with it you weed! where?
Originally posted by FMFAt last a confession! so
Leave it to the web site. They should also consider the suggestions that I am a pedophile that GHOST HUNTER has been making in parallel to your insinuations and which you have pointedly not distanced yourself from. This is a serious matter robbie. Tell the web site about your suspicions.
I have not stated that you cannot be trusted with children despite your claim to the contrary, I have not termed you a pervert and I have not termed you a pedophile, you simply made it up that I have. Thankyou its always pleasing when reality kicks in.
15 Feb 16
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFYou do not recall because i never made a single allegation on that list. If you have concerns with ghost hunters text then i suggest that you confront him. To attempt to hold me in some way responsible through failure to disassociate myself from what other users have stated is ludicrous.
GHOST HUNTER has taken a cue from your banter and made the more explicit allegations. I don't recall you actually using the words pervert etc.
Originally posted by divegeesterNot a single statement saying that he cannot be trusted with children, or that he is a pervert or that he is a pedophile. He simply made it up.
Thread 166581
15 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieEven if you were merely asking out loud in public if I could or couldn't be trusted with children - which you did - this is stuff for the moderators and not appropriate for forum banter.
Not a single statement saying that he cannot be trusted with children, or that he is a pervert or that he is a pedophile. He simply made it up.
15 Feb 16
Originally posted by FMFYou are falling into fiction once again, man reality must have been outta there like all get out! I have not stated or thought out loud that you could not be trusted with children all I have stated was that it was conceivable that in your guise as a woman which we know is true its conceivable that you may have duped some minors because the site allows anyone over the age of thirteen to join. Now you can call this irresponsible but its not a direct claim that you cannot be trusted with children, or that you are a pervert or that you are a pedophile.
Even if you were merely asking out loud in public if I could or couldn't be trusted with children - which you did - this is stuff for the moderators and not appropriate for forum banter.
15 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhatever your wriggling shifting squirming insinuations are or are not, just tell the web site about them. Child Protection is not a joking matter.
You are falling into fiction once again, man reality must have been outta there like all get out! I have not stated or thought out loud that you could not be trusted with children all I have stated was that it was conceivable that in your guise as a woman which we know is true its conceivable that you may have duped some minors because the site allo ...[text shortened]... that you cannot be trusted with children, or that you are a pervert or that you are a pedophile.
15 Feb 16
Originally posted by FMFNeither is middle aged dudes masquerading as women on the Internet. Just out of curiosity, did you dress up?
Whatever your wriggling shifting squirming insinuations are or are not, just tell the web site about them. Child Protection is not a joking matter.
15 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieTell the web site that this is what you think. Show them your evidence. Let them deal with it.
all I have stated was that it was conceivable that in your guise as a woman which we know is true its conceivable that you may have duped some minors because the site allows anyone over the age of thirteen to join.
15 Feb 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI await the web site's response. Your suspicions are not appropriate for forum banter. Take them to the mods.
Thanks but first i need you to answer why you were masquerading as a women. That will clear everything up.
As for GHOST HUNTER calling me a "filthy pervert", has he shown you the evidence he has to justify saying it?