28 Nov 05
1 edit
Originally posted by Hand of Hecatecan we add exposives as well?
I think we should meet up in Florida for a wild pig hunt. A bunch of screaming RHP'ers running around the swamps with high caliber weapons, dogs and ferocious hogs would make the London meet up pale by comparison.
http://www.a-wild-boar-hog-hunting-florida-guide-service.com/
i think the standard by which all future RHP meetups should be measured is number of arrests. 😉
28 Nov 05
1 edit
Originally posted by Hand of HecateIf I'm late, do start without me....
I think we should meet up in Florida for a wild pig hunt. A bunch of screaming RHP'ers running around the swamps with high caliber weapons, dogs and ferocious hogs would make the London meet up pale by comparison.
http://www.a-wild-boar-hog-hunting-florida-guide-service.com/
28 Nov 05
Tally so far:
East:
DC - ll
Boston - lllll-1/2
Tennessee (city?) - l
Macon, GA - l
Tornto - 1/2
Montreal - 1/2
Philadelphia - llll-1/2
NYC - ll
Pittsburgh - ll
Central:
Dallas - ll
Kansas City - l
Milwaukee - l
Detroit - l
Minneapolis - l
West:
SF - lll
Denver - llll
------------------
If Darvlay and GBS want to pick just one of their two cities, we can get rid of the halves....
28 Nov 05
Originally posted by The PlumberI wouldn't mind Philly either.
You can't heckle the president in Philadelphia....😉
The London meet up was so succesful because europe is a great deal smaller than America. Why don't we arrange a bunch of these across America so we all don't have to travel so far.
28 Nov 05
Originally posted by The PlumberI don't know how much sense it makes to count only first choices. There might be places which few people have as their first choice, but many people would be able and willing to go to if it would be decided to have the meet-up there. That would seem to be a better choice than a place a few more people have as their first choice, but which few who don't have it as their first choice would go to at all.
I have you down as voting for NYC - I only took your first choice as I don't have a means of counting 1st, 2nd, and 3rd choices....
28 Nov 05
Originally posted by zakkwylderIn terms of people getting to the London meet it was a success as there were a good number of us who could get there. Aside from the two flying in, I think everyone else was either from London itself, or a relatively short train journey away (I wouldn't have gone if still living in Conwy). The size of Europe is pretty irrelevant, you'll want to pcik somewhere where several willing people can get to.
I wouldn't mind Philly either.
The London meet up was so succesful because europe is a great deal smaller than America. Why don't we arrange a bunch of these across America so we all don't have to travel so far.
28 Nov 05
Originally posted by Hand of HecateThis is definately worth thinking about...Let's use your dogs though.
I think we should meet up in Florida for a wild pig hunt. A bunch of screaming RHP'ers running around the swamps with high caliber weapons, dogs and ferocious hogs would make the London meet up pale by comparison.
http://www.a-wild-boar-hog-hunting-florida-guide-service.com/
RTh
28 Nov 05
Originally posted by NordlysYou Germans with your fancy proportional representation...
I don't know how much sense it makes to count only first choices. There might be places which few people have as their first choice, but many people would be able and willing to go to if it would be decided to have the meet-up there. That would seem to be a better choice than a place a few more people have as their first choice, but which few who don't have it as their first choice would go to at all.