30 Jun 21
The post that was quoted here has been removedI've played both in the past. (I believe).
Chess is a beautiful game and I like to separate it from any personal disagreements or angst. If I had lost those games (I didn't) I would have been okay with that, as long as I was outplayed.
@divegeester saidMy sincere apologies for not being up to your standards.
17 games, 826 moves…in 6 years and still provisionally rated.
The post that was quoted here has been removedBut, in a partial effort to explain your reason for refusing Ghost of a Duke's offer a game, you chose to relate an anecdote about someone called Cathy Forbes claiming she was sexually harassed by someone called John Henderson, right?
So, your reason is secret but a story about a woman alleging she was sexually harassed helps you explain your arritude to Ghost of a Duke. Am I understanding this correctly?
The post that was quoted here has been removedI think the reason you do absolutely nothing on this website except post autistic-style poison into forums which you have condemned as “perpetuating hate” is of great interested.
Your refusal to play Ghost of a Duke, who is clearly a pretty strong consistent player, is interesting especially given all your flouncy posturing a few days ago, about how amazing you were at chess and how awful this website was at accommodating good players like yourself.
I suspect you’re not very intelligent, easily provoked to making trigger moves, in life and in chess, and you are too scared to play Ghost of a Duke.