Originally posted by KaoslosDon't you mean SOcial Services, seing as you live in Copenhagen and all that innit?
[b] Getting your kids off to sleep by giving them red wine is not responsible parenting no matter what day it is.
shh please don't tell the social services :-)
Edit: to spoil the fun (and the next posters)- "My: xxx state"[/b]
-m.
Originally posted by mikelomYes, off cause! right after you jump at me from nowhere instead of staying at the subject I wish to tell you my real life identity.. Lets for now just say that there are playere in here that know me irl and can vouch for me on my claims :-)
Well with your rating and climb to fame are you asking me to be your sponsor now?
You already said you have a boss/manager.... wot's up - does he cream your income from OTB??....
Can you give us an example of one of your OTB games, venue/opposition etc plus date, and some kind of annotation of your game?
Even a game with your anno would suffice.... prepared to do that to qualify your position here?
-m. 😏
Edit: And it's not my wife, son or one of my daughters ;-)
Originally posted by Kaoslosand I'm probaly one of the highest if not the highest rated otb players on this side.
no -I just been playing with other chessplayers ;-) - yes my profile is true! If you put enough at stake I'll show you...
Edit: and I'm probaly one of the highest if not the highest rated otb players on this side - I'll show you that too if you put enough at stake. So the question is - will you put your money where your accusations are? :-)
FIDE rating?
Originally posted by Proper KnobI can see that Fides rating page is down at the moment, but I still feel that giving my precise Elo would single me out pretty much ;-) - somewhat above 2200...
[b]and I'm probaly one of the highest if not the highest rated otb players on this side.
FIDE rating?[/b]
Originally posted by KaoslosI can't believe that none of your family will vouch for you. I realise you probably spend too much time on the computer, don't we all, but it seems a bit harsh.
Yes, off cause! right after you jump at me from nowhere instead of staying at the subject I wish to tell you my real life identity.. Lets for now just say that there are playere in here that know me irl and can vouch for me on my claims :-)
Edit: And it's not my wife, son or one of my daughters ;-)
Originally posted by thaughbaerLMAO - sharp tonight aren't we :-) - as I almost stated earlier - the red wine is talking if you don't understand me properly :-)
I can't believe that none of your family will vouch for you. I realise you probably spend too much time on the computer, don't we all, but it seems a bit harsh.
Originally posted by KaoslosLets consider your graph, sensational no? I think it is..why not share your tehac tactsi that can be usefull to some here, were will you go from here? will you take up a professional career?....maybe you'll continue to swat idiots like me with 30 second replies where it takes me three weeks in some cases to find an adequate reply..what about your family, are they behind you if you chase this goal?....you must be very proud of your endeavours, a true beast................F.C.S.
LMAO - sharp tonight aren't we :-) - as I almost stated earlier - the red wine is talking if you don't understand me properly :-)
Originally posted by Hells Caretakerconditional moves in totally won positions m8 - who drags the games as far as you can - keep up the good work :-). I don't know about "tehac tactsi" - is that even words?
Lets consider your graph, sensational no? I think it is..why not share your tehac tactsi that can be usefull to some here, were will you go from here? will you take up a professional career?....maybe you'll continue to swat idiots like me with 30 second replies where it takes me three weeks in some cases to find an adequate reply..what about your fam ...[text shortened]... ase this goal?....you must be very proud of your endeavours, a true beast................F.C.S.
I suggest that you and the rest of the posters that finds my claims to be untrue (profile and elo above 2200) to put your money where your accusations are. I'll take the bet 10/1 that my profile is 100% true and my elo is somewhat above 2200 - when you reach a pool where I get € 1.000 (meaning you get € 10.000 back if I'm lying) I'll reveal my identity and claim my money. Enough of this!
Originally posted by KaoslosI'm done with this also, dragged for the obvious reason, can not be be arsesd any longer..... hence my resignations to you....hope you stay top for ages.
conditional moves in totally won positions m8 - who drags the games as far as you can - keep up the good work :-). I don't know about "tehac tactsi" - is that even words?
I suggest that you and the rest of the posters that finds my claims to be untrue (profile and elo above 2200) to put your money where your accusations are. I'll take the bet 10/1 that m ...[text shortened]... et € 10.000 back if I'm lying) I'll reveal my identity and claim my money. Enough of this!
Is it really necessary to pursue someone's identity so much? This is the internet. I am running two concurrent games with Kaoslos, both I am enjoying. If you put as much energy into chess as you do in discovering identities you might be a lot better at chess. Until I see a reason not to support Kaoslos I'll back him as a true player. I see no reason to distrust his play from our two current games. I hope everyone had a wonderful Christmas season.
K&P
Originally posted by Kings and PawnsHello here's another, time to resign this one as well.
Is it really necessary to pursue someone's identity so much? This is the internet. I am running two concurrent games with Kaoslos, both I am enjoying. If you put as much energy into chess as you do in discovering identities you might be a lot better at chess. Until I see a reason not to support Kaoslos I'll back him as a true player. I see no reason ...[text shortened]... is play from our two current games. I hope everyone had a wonderful Christmas season.
K&P
It sometimes amazes me to see how lacking in fundamental knowledge even some 2000+ on this site are. Case in point:
Game 6940293
On move 56, White decides to block a check with his Rook. This enables Skeeter to turn a Rook + 4 Pawns v. Rook + 3 Pawns with all Pawns on the same side, a theoretical draw, into a King + 4 Pawns v. King + 3 Pawns which is an elementary win.