20 Dec 18
@kellyjay saidDo you think that emplying completely unscriptural, distastefully evocative and demonising phraseology such as you are using here, somehow raises the value of your spiritual credibility with the forum and your supporters such as SecondSon and sonship?
Christ is that truth which God has given us. You pissed on Him, and are still doingthat, setting yourself up for destruction and your attempting to take down asmany with you as possible.
20 Dec 18
@kellyjay saidYou were dodging by making things up. I wasn't asking you to "defend other people's beliefs". I was asking you about the "evidence" you'd cited.
I don’t mind sharing what I believe, but how things promote or relate to other religions I don’t care. So being repeatedly asked about something you were told I am not going to discuss is simply harassing and it doesn’t matter what your intentions or desires are.
@kellyjay saidI wasn't asking you to "defend other people's beliefs". I was digging into your claim that the "evidence" was "painfully obvious". It turns out that you can't bring yourself to see past the "evidence" fitting your religious beliefs as you need it to. You aren't really treating it as "evidence" of anything really, just as something to bolster your partisan prism. Suggesting that I was asking you to "defend other people's beliefs" is the same kind of disingenuous thing. Whether it's you, and how you are, or whether your religion has made you like this ~ this is interesting to me.
You should go back and read what you wrote that I am objecting to.
20 Dec 18
@fmf saidEvidence of a creator is painfully obvious to all those that believe in a creator, genius.
I wasn't asking you to "defend other people's beliefs". I was digging into your claim that the "evidence" was "painfully obvious". It turns out that you can't bring yourself to see past the "evidence" fitting your religious beliefs as you need it to. You aren't really treating it as "evidence" of anything really, just as something to bolster your partisan prism. Suggesting that I ...[text shortened]... s you, and how you are, or whether your religion has made you like this ~ this is interesting to me.
20 Dec 18
@fmf saidOn the Son of God who died for your sins, you know better but are suppressing the truth.
If you're objecting to me "pissing" ~ as you put it ~ on a man that I believe to have been dead for 2,000 years, then I am not going to go back a read that again. You are what you post, KellyJay.
20 Dec 18
@dj2becker saidEven to those that deny!
Evidence of a creator is painfully obvious to all those that believe in a creator, genius.
@dj2becker saidThat makes as much sense as a court judge saying
Evidence of a creator is painfully obvious to all those that believe in a creator, genius.
Evidence of the defendant's guilt is painfully obvious to all those that believe he is guilty.
@wolfgang59 saidIronically you believe Hammond is guilty of lying without any firsthand evidence at all.
That makes as much sense as a court judge saying
Evidence of the defendant's guilt is painfully obvious to all those that believe he is guilty.
@kellyjay saidI don't believe "the Son of God died" for anyone's "sins". So it's silly for you to assert that it's a "truth" that I am "supressing". Are you "suppressing" the "truth" of what Muslims believe about Jesus? No, of course not. So don't be so daft.
On the Son of God who died for your sins, you know better but are suppressing the truth.