Originally posted by josephwThey are both irrational. Neither has been supported by either reason or logic. They are nothing more than assertions.
Consider the following two statements.
All that exists is evidence for a creator.
All that exists is evidence for there being no creator.
Which statement is irrational?
Suggestion: look up the meaning of the word 'rational' before you use it again.
Originally posted by josephwNot directly.
But not 100%?
He has stated he believes one thing very clearly.
You have claimed that he believes another thing.
Indirectly that means you are claiming that he lied ie you are claiming he believes something contrary to what he has clearly stated he believes.
13 Mar 17
Originally posted by twhiteheadI didn't tell you what you believe. You told yourself that. I only told you that what you believe is a delusion, specifically about the existence of a creator.
How do I do that when you keep telling me what I believe? (despite it being contrary to what I think I believe)
13 Mar 17
Originally posted by twhiteheadYes, I did say atheists were lying to themselves. No, I did not call anyone a liar.
Yes you did.
[b]I only told you that what you believe is a delusion, specifically about the existence of a creator.
What you said was that I was lying to myself and I believe in God. You did tell me what I believe.[/b]
No, I did not say atheists believe in God, but I did say they know there is a creator.
Originally posted by josephwSo you started this thread to assert that people like twhitehead are dishonest, have a mental disorder, and have disturbed minds. What outcome are you hoping for from all this?
Yes, I did say atheists were lying to themselves. No, I did not call anyone a liar.
No, I did not say atheists believe in God, but I did say they know there is a creator.
Originally posted by FMFWell, I guess you could say I was hoping for an honest and open discussion about the delusional idea of believing there is no creator God responsible for all that exists, but as usual that ain't gonna happen.
What outcome are you hoping for from all this?
When I make the assertion that all that exists is the evidence for a creator God, and assert that ...[text shortened]... o support that claim.
Until now all I hear are unfounded ad hominem attacks and personal insults.
13 Mar 17
Originally posted by josephwI made a counter assertion - for the sake or the discussion - but you basically sidestepped it and said something silly instead about a "flying spaghetti monster". You are the one who seems to be hiding behind slurs about "mental disorders" and "disturbed minds".
Run and hide.
13 Mar 17
Originally posted by josephwIf you want an honest and open discussion you have to start by being honest and open yourself.
Well, I guess you could say I was hoping for an honest and open discussion
When I make the assertion that all that exists is the evidence for a creator God,
If you want an honest and open discussion, it would be wise to back up that assertion rather than simply repeating it ad nauseum and pretending it is rational when it isn't.
Until now all I hear are unfounded ad hominem attacks and personal insults.
You either haven't been reading the responses, or you are lying.