Believers, Non-Believers & Morality

Originally posted by @dj2becker
How do you know that I am lying? I.e that I am deliberately misleading you?

Because you pretended that we had not had certain discussions and you pretended not to have read certain posts when you had. Over time it became clear it was a deliberate and deceitful gimmick. You were not able to "mislead" me on this matter.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
FMF claims that he thinks I lie in everyday conversations.

But you haven't forgotten you made a public apology to this forum for 'deliberately misleading people' when you didn't make people aware you had switched accounts?

How does this not contradict the statement you just made saying, "Good luck proving that I have deliberately misled people."

Also, if an unintentional error is considered the same as a lie, why isn't deliberately misleading people (something you publically acknowledged you had done) not likewise a form of lying?


Would you like a bigger shovel?

Originally posted by @fmf
Because you pretended that we had not had certain discussions and you pretended not to have read certain posts when we/you had. Over time it became clear it was a deliberate and deceitful gimmick. You were not able to "mislead" me on this matter.

How do you know for sure that I had read and remembered the specific posts you were referring to?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
How do you know for sure that I had read and remembered the specific posts you were referring to?

Because they appeared in the 'Reply & Quote' window above your replies. What's more, it happened maybe more than a hundred times over the last two years. Several other posters commented on it. I gave you their names back in January when we discussed this before.

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
I don't think he'll ever understand that.

With your poorly-worded sentences and inability to properly express yourself, I probably won’t.

Originally posted by @romans1009
With your poorly-worded sentences and inability to properly express yourself, I probably won’t.

It wasn't poorly-worded at all. Go back and read the OP, what dj2becker posted, and then what Ghost of a Duke posted. You are making a fool of yourself.

Originally posted by @fmf
I think pride may well be his issue rather than his understanding.

I think deceitfulness and trolling are your issues (not to mention pool whizzing.)

Isn’t it odd how duchess64 goes inactive whenever you’re active? Strange coincidence.

Originally posted by @fmf
I think Romans1009's silly stubbornness about Ghost of a Duke's atheism and theology credentials and the meaning of the word "notion" as used on page 1 of this thread is fuelled by his pride and not by an issue of understanding.

Ghost said he had no notion of divine law. I questioned him on it as I believed (and still believe) he was trying to pull a fast one (i.e. lying.) I later came to accept that he did a poor job in expressing himself.

Originally posted by @fmf
Because they appeared in the 'Reply & Quote' window above your replies. What's more, it happened maybe more than a hundred times over the last two years. Several other posters commented on it. I gave you their names back in January when we discussed this before.

Ah yes it happened hundreds of times yet you somehow cannot find one example of it? Strange coincidence.

Originally posted by @romans1009
Ghost said he had no notion of divine law. I questioned him on it as I believed (and still believe) he was trying to pull a fast one (i.e. lying.) I later came to accept that he did a poor job in expressing himself.

He is an atheist so he has no notion of divine law - nor does he have any notion of "sin" or of everlasting life. It's as if you don't know what this thread is about. Read the OP again. He expressed himself perfectly ~ and what dj2becker meant and what Ghost of a Duke meant in reply was clear and erudite.

Originally posted by @fmf
You can decide for yourself. Being "humble" is about the nature of interactions with other people, so it's for those who are on the receiving end of interactions with me to decide whether they find me "humble" or not. I almost invariably rub jerks and people with chips on their shoulders up the wrong way. I do not regard myself as either "humble" or not "humble".

You’re an insufferable, deceitful, trolling and pool-whizzing pain in the neck.

You think you’re smart but endless repetition does not an argument make. Because you lack the intelligence to win an argument legitimately or on the merits, you resort to endless (and frequently pointless) questioning and falsely claim you already answered others’ questions or “can’t be bothered” to reply.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Ah yes it happened hundreds of times yet you somehow cannot find one example of it? Strange coincidence.

Why do you think I have to find examples of it? We both know exactly what I am talking about ~ I've broached it with you countless times ~ and you know exactly when it happened because on dozens and dozens of occasions I pointed it out to you, post by post. I don't need to go "find" examples.

Originally posted by @romans1009
You’re an insufferable, deceitful, trolling and pool-whizzing pain in the neck.

You think you’re smart but endless repetition does not an argument make. Because you lack the intelligence to win an argument legitimately or on the merits, you resort to endless (and frequently pointless) questioning and falsely claim you already answered others’ questions or “can’t be bothered” to reply.

Your bruised-sounding perspective is duly noted.

Originally posted by @fmf
It wasn't poorly-worded at all. Go back and read the OP, what dj2becker posted, and then what Ghost of a Duke posted. You are making a fool of yourself.

It’s interesting you feel the need to reply for Ghost. Perhaps you subconsciously also realize he doesn’t express himself well and needs help?

Originally posted by @fmf
He is an atheist so he has no notion of divine law - nor does he have any notion of "sin" or of everlasting life. It's as if you don't know what this thread is about. Read the OP again. He expressed himself perfectly ~ and what dj2becker meant and what Ghost of a Duke meant in reply was clear and erudite.

Given your lack of intelligence and track record of deceitfulness and pool whizzing, you’re hardly one to judge how someone expresses himself.