15 Nov 18
@sonship saidI have never said you are "eating vomit" nor have I made any comment even remotely like it. Not once in ten years.
@FMF
FMF -
Obsessed with regurgitating the screeds of some idol of yours,
So my teaching of the Bible is eating vomit.
So his idolizing everything manmade other then God is eating feces.
@FMF
You didn't have to say "vomit." Regurgitate means just that.
You blew it. Back to the skepto drawing board.
@sonship saidI have never suggested that Christians "eat vomit". You have introduced these words. Not me.
You see folks FMF wants to draw attention to me saying something about him eating feces.
But of COURSE it is OK for him to speak of my teaching of the word of God as "regurgitating" implying that lovers of the Bible are eating vomit.
Was my word picture so much worse than his own ?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/regurgitate
Includes the thought of throwing up food again - [my bolding]
regurgitate verb
re·gur·gi·tate | \(ˌ)rē-ˈgər-jə-ˌtāt \
regurgitated; regurgitating
Definition of regurgitate
intransitive verb
: to become thrown or poured back
transitive verb
: to throw or pour back or out from or as if from a cavity
regurgitate food
memorized facts to regurgitate on the exam
15 Nov 18
@sonship said"Regurgitate memorized facts".
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/regurgitate
Includes the thought of throwing up food again -
regurgitate verb
re·gur·gi·tate | \(ˌ)rē-ˈgər-jə-ˌtāt \
regurgitated; regurgitating
Definition of regurgitate
intransitive verb
: to become thrown or poured back
transitive verb
: to throw or pour back or out from or as if from a cavity
regurgitate food
memorized facts to regurgitate on the exam
The idea of Christians "eating vomit" or some such is yours not mine.
@sonship saidI have never described your ideas or Witness Lee's ideas as "faeces" or "vomit". I have never compared you to a "leper" or likened you to a "cockroach", nor have I ever said anything like "I'd rather die than have a mind like yours". Nothing like that. I have never been angry while posting. I have never insulted you in the way you insult people. You seem to be a law unto yourself when "provoked".
@FMF
Obsessed with regurgitating the screeds of some idol of yours,
Your idea of how to describe my quoting the Bible a lot.
15 Nov 18
I have never described your ideas or Witness Lee's ideas as "faeces" or "vomit". I have never compared you to a "leper" or likened you to a "cockroach", nor have I ever said anything like "I'd rather die than have a mind like yours". Nothing like that. I have never been angry while posting. I have never insulted you in the way you insult people. You seem to be a law unto yourself when "provoked".
You're a real totally innocent guy aren't you?
15 Nov 18
@sonship saidWe're talking about "faeces" and "spreading germs" and "unclean" dogs and pigs and being "diseased" and all the rest if it. What warrants or justifies all this? Your Bible? Your own self-righteousness?
And while FMF is on the subject of provoking people, who on this board works harder at subtly insulting many of you?
However he usually conceals his contempt with a question mark at the end to disguise his slights as phony objective curiosity.
15 Nov 18
@sonship saidWhat have I said that you think your vitriolic personal insults are eqivalent to?
@FMF
I have never described your ideas or Witness Lee's ideas as "faeces" or "vomit". I have never compared you to a "leper" or likened you to a "cockroach", nor have I ever said anything like "I'd rather die than have a mind like yours". Nothing like that. I have never been angry while posting. I have never insulted you in the way you insult people. You seem to be a law unto yourself when "provoked".
You're a real totally innocent guy aren't you?
15 Nov 18
@sonship saidMy curiosity about the effect that religiosity has on people's integrity and intellectual/interpersonal behaviour is purely subjective. I've never claimed it's "objective curiosity". Have you found it to be "objective"? It's subjective as far as I am concerned.
However he usually conceals his contempt with a question mark at the end to disguise his slights as phony objective curiosity.