Has the generation of 1914 passed away?

Originally posted by FMF
As I said, robbie, it is already being discussed here on the overlapping Thread 146778. Neither I nor galveston75 [or anyone else who has posted there] should be expected to have to retype our discussion here on this thread simply because you are, rather oddly, pretending that that discussion isn't taking place and that galveston75 hasn't already responded.

no what you have said is the Gman claimed that the watchtower was inspired, you have
produced nothing despite having been asked almost eight times to do so. I suspect
you have nothing and simply purport to be a charlatan and will remain so until you
actually produce a quotation.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no what you have said is the Gman claimed that the watchtower was inspired, you have
produced nothing despite having been asked almost eight times to do so. I suspect
you have nothing and simply purport to be a charlatan and will remain so until you
actually produce a quotation.

It is already being discussed here Thread 146778 where galveston75 has already responed.

As you well know, he appears to have retracted his claims about divine inspiration - he has conceded he used the word "inspired" - and yet he says he is not retracting his "meaning", and has since been confronted with verbatim quotes of what he said back in April.

For you to pretend otherwise [seeing as you yourself have posted on that thread] is a rather strange contribution for you to be making to this discussion.

Originally posted by FMF
It is already being discussed here Thread 146778 where galveston75 has already responed.

As you well know, he appears to have retracted his claims about divine inspiration - he has conceded he used the word "inspired" - and yet he says he is not retracting his "meaning", and has since been confronted with verbatim quotes of what he said back in ...[text shortened]... ed on that thread] is a rather strange contribution for you to be making to this discussion.

charlatan! produce the quotation!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
charlatan! produce the quotation!

The discussion, including galveston's partial and equivocal retraction and him conceding what words he did/should have used, is already in progress on the other thread, robbie. You making personal remarks about me here on this thread, when you are aware of that, doesn't really achieve anything.

Originally posted by FMF
The discussion, including galveston's partial and equivocal retraction and him conceding what words he did/should have used, is already in progress on the other thread, robbie. You making personal remarks about me here on this thread, when you are aware of that, doesn't really achieve anything.

you make claims without substantiation, that makes you a charlatan,

charlatan
n.
A person who makes elaborate, fraudulent, and often voluble claims to skill or knowledge; a quack or fraud.

produce the quotation and I shall retract the statement and issue a public apology,
otherwise. . . . . .oh well.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you make claims without substantiation, that makes you a charlatan,

charlatan
n.
A person who makes elaborate, fraudulent, and often voluble claims to skill or knowledge; a quack or fraud.

produce the quotation and I shall retract the statement and issue a public apology,
otherwise. . . . . .oh well.

As you know, the discussion is already going on here: Thread 146778

Originally posted by FMF
As you know, the discussion is already going on here: Thread 146778

no quotation, no retraction.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no quotation, no retraction.

Not sure what you think you're achieving on this thread, robbie.

On the other thread, galveston75 has been confronted with verbatim quotes of what he said back in April, and he has conceded he used the word "inspired".

So, he seems to have partially retracted his claims about divine inspiration, and yet he also says he is not retracting his "meaning".

The discussion is ongoing and galveston75's futher response is awaited.

Originally posted by FMF
Not sure what you think you're achieving on this thread, robbie.

On the other thread, galveston75 has been confronted with verbatim quotes of what he said back in April, and he has conceded he used the word "inspired".

So, he seems to have partially retracted his claims about divine inspiration, and yet he also says he is not retracting his "meaning".

The discussion is ongoing and galveston75's futher response is awaited.

it should be a simple task for you to produce his quotation along side your assertion
that the Gman claimed inspiration, for example,

FMF, 'Galveston claimed the watchtower was inspired'
Gman, 'the watchtower is inspired'.

or as has been proven by your inability to produce the statement in accordance with
your accusation,

FMF, 'Galveston claimed that the watchtower was inspired',

evidence, nil! conclusion, charlatan.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
it should be a simple task for you to produce his quotation along side your assertion
that the Gman claimed inspiration, for example,

FMF, 'Galveston claimed the watchtower was inspired'
Gman, 'the watchtower is inspired'.

or as has been proven by your inability to produce the statement in accordance with
your accusation,

FMF, 'Galveston claimed that the watchtower was inspired',

evidence, nil! conclusion, charlatan.

The discussion is going on here: Thread 146778

Originally posted by FMF
The discussion is going on here: Thread 146778

it should be a simple task for you to produce his quotation along side your assertion
that the Gman claimed inspiration, for example,

FMF, 'Galveston claimed the watchtower was inspired'
Gman, 'the watchtower is inspired'.

or as has been proven by your inability to produce the statement in accordance with
your accusation,

FMF, 'Galveston claimed that the watchtower was inspired',

evidence, nil! conclusion, charlatan.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
it should be a simple task for you to produce his quotation along side your assertion
that the Gman claimed inspiration, for example,

FMF, 'Galveston claimed the watchtower was inspired'
Gman, 'the watchtower is inspired'.

or as has been proven by your inability to produce the statement in accordance with
your accusation,

FMF, 'Galveston claimed that the watchtower was inspired',

evidence, nil! conclusion, charlatan.

You're not achieving anything here robbie. The discussion you're looking for here: Thread 146778

Originally posted by FMF
You're not achieving anything here robbie. The discussion you're looking for here: Thread 146778

i want the quotation FMF, you said the Gman claims that the watchtower is inspired, you
have produced no such quotation, let me know when you do.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
i want the quotation FMF, you said the Gman claims that the watchtower is inspired, you
have produced no such quotation, let me know when you do.

See Thread 146778.

Originally posted by FMF
See Thread 146778.

ok you have effectively bored me to tears, ill look for the quotation when you provide
it, otherwise you remain a charlatan.