Originally posted by RJHindsno i have provided five Biblical principles which empirically demonstrate that we are
[b]If you claim that the JWs or the Watchtower Society are the sole holders of Gods truth on earth; then, you are teaching falsely. STOP IT![/b]
solely the holders of Gods truth on earth, you may make reference to those. You can
touch us RJH, we reside under the protection of the most high God, Jehovah while you
are wired to the moon!
26 May 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieJust before you start teaching people about Gods Kingdom, you should inform them that your organization is not inspired or infallible, so they don't get the wrong impression.
no we go from house to house teaching people about Gods Kingdom, not whether we
are inspired or infallible.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI worship the Son of God, not the sun god or the moon god. HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord!
no i have provided five Biblical principles which empirically demonstrate that we are
solely the holders of Gods truth on earth, you may make reference to those. You can
touch us RJH, we reside under the protection of the most high God, Jehovah while you
are wired to the moon!
Originally posted by RJHindshow can i give them the impression that we are inspired and infallible, do you think
Just before you start teaching people about Gods Kingdom, you should inform them that your organization is not inspired or infallible, so they don't get the wrong impression.
residing in the wilderness of Sinai, eating wild locusts and honey and sporting a John
the Baptist outfit might do it?
Originally posted by FMFdiametrically opposite is your opinion, the Gman, no doubt has his own version of
Well, it can't be really described as a "with-hunt", if I am merely asking galveston75 to explain what he said, as a result of it being diametrically opposite to what you said.
affairs.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat I hope for is a clear answer from galveston75 on the other thread. If he stands by what he said in the "interpretation" thread in April, then presumably you will be suggesting to him that he retract it. I find it all quite interesting. But I know what you're trying to achieve by describing my participation in this discussion as a "with-hunt". That's quite interesting too.
whatever i hope you get what your looking for.
Originally posted by RJHindswrong, there have always been witnesses of Jehovah, starting with the righteous man
Where is that written in the Holy Scriptures? The Jehovah's Witnesses were not even conjured up until the 1800's.
Enoch! indeed the very name comes form the book of Isaiah,
(Isaiah 43:10) . . .“you are my witnesses,” is the utterance of Jehovah, “even my
servant whom I have chosen, in order that you may know and have faith in me, and
that you may understand that I am the same One. Before me there was no God
formed, and after me there continued to be none. . .
Originally posted by FMFno i have not said he should retract anything, he has been a witness for far longer than
What I hope for is a clear answer from galveston75 on the other thread. If he stands by what he said in the "interpretation" thread in April, then presumably you will be suggesting to him that he retract it. I find it all quite interesting.
me and is well a faithful brother, Jehovah will look after him.