How is eternity expressed mathematically?

Originally posted by Suzianne
I have to express doubt here. This "eternal torment in the Lake of Fire" concept IS mainstream in most Christian denominations. Whenever I speak to other Christians and express my ideas on Annihilationism, I'm usually derided, asked if I can read scripture, etc. It's usually not pretty.

I'm sure you are correct, although since my flight over to the Eternal City this afternoon it seems that more wheels have come off of the robbie carrobie integrity wagon.

It's a shame FMF doesn't post the content of the PMs robbie sent him, that would certainly heat things up a little methinks.

Originally posted by divegeester
I'm sure you are correct, although since my flight over to the Eternal City this afternoon it seems that more wheels have come off of the robbie carrobie integrity wagon.

It's a shame FMF doesn't post the content of the PMs robbie sent him, that would certainly heat things up a little methinks.

why dont you address the actual content of my posts instead of concerning yourself with idle gossip like a life starved housewife eager for some juicy details of her neighbours doings? Or you could read the celebrity section of the Daily Mail for your daily fix of gossip? This is the spirituality forum, its purpose is for discussing things of a spiritual nature, not your idle gossip.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
why dont you address the actual content of my posts instead of concerning yourself with idle gossip like a life starved housewife eager for some juicy details of her neighbours doings? Or you could read the celebrity section of the Daily Mail for your daily fix of gossip? This is the spirituality forum, its purpose is for discussing things of a spiritual nature, not your idle gossip.

I think your repeated integrity meltdowns are of a "spiritual" interest. You are supposed to be representative of [your] god and one of the sole holders of [your] god's truth on earth; don't you think the doctrine of eternal suffering is something you should be speaking out against?

Originally posted by divegeester
I think your repeated integrity meltdowns are of a "spiritual" interest. You are supposed to be representative of [your] god and one of the sole holders of [your] god's truth on earth; don't you think the doctrine of eternal suffering is something you should be speaking out against?

I dont have any integrity issues, then again i hardly concern myself with idle gossip either.

You may make reference to my posts detailing the ideas behind the doctrine and why I think it cannot be sustained. It remains my prerogative what I choose to post and when.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I dont have any integrity issues, then again i hardly concern myself with idle gossip either.

You may make reference to my posts detailing the ideas behind the doctrine and why I think it cannot be sustained. It remains my prerogative what I choose to post and when.

Of course it is; and yet here you are blathering on as usual for page after hilarious page in a thread you "choose" not to post in. You are an unusal person.

Originally posted by divegeester
Of course it is; and yet here you are blathering on as usual for page after hilarious page in a thread you "choose" not to post in. You are an unusal person.

The reasons why I dont think the doctrine is sustainable are present, all personal references and idle gossip will be ignored henceforth. As will any 'crazy ol bats' and Daily Mail readers and other idle gossipers.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The reasons why I dont think the doctrine is sustainable are present, all personal references and idle gossip will be ignored henceforth. As will any 'crazy ol bats' and Daily Mail readers and other idle gossipers.

Good for you. It's taken you what, 6 pages to say something you could have said in one or two posts. Are you attention seeking? Do you secretly like this arguing? That's it isn't it...you see yourself as the defender of the forum.

Edit:
Do you see yourself as the forum "intercessor" a sort of pseudo vicar of christ of the boards sort of thing?

Originally posted by divegeester
Good for you. It's taken you what, 6 pages to say something you could have said in one or two posts. Are you attention seeking? Do you secretly like this arguing? That's it isn't it...you see yourself as the defender of the forum.

Edit:
Do you see yourself as the forum "intercessor" a sort of pseudo vicar of christ of the boards sort of thing?

eternal torment doctrine ringin any bells?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
eternal torment doctrine ringin any bells?

Do you see yourself as the forum "intercessor" a sort of pseudo vicar of christ of the boards sort of thing?

I remember you saying to me in the "etiquette" thread "beat up on me instead". Is that how you see your role here?

Originally posted by divegeester
Do you see yourself as the forum "intercessor" a sort of pseudo vicar of christ of the boards sort of thing?

I remember you saying to me in the "etiquette" thread "beat up on me instead". Is that how you see your role here?

what is it about 'all personal references will be ignored', that yet evades you?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
what is it about 'all personal references will be ignored', that yet evades you?

Do you classify "daily mail readers" and "crazy dingbats" as personal references?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
what is it about 'all personal references will be ignored', that yet evades you?

Do you see yourself as the forum "intercessor" a sort of pseudo vicar of christ of the boards sort of thing? I remember you saying to me in the "etiquette" thread "beat up on me instead". Is that how you see your role here?

I think I have you pegged here, don't I?

Originally posted by divegeester
Do you classify "daily mail readers" and "crazy dingbats" as personal references?

no more as 'classes' of crazies

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
no more as 'classes' of crazies

Are you wearing a loin-cloth as we speak?

Originally posted by divegeester
Do you see yourself as the forum "intercessor" a sort of pseudo vicar of christ of the boards sort of thing? I remember you saying to me in the "etiquette" thread "beat up on me instead". Is that how you see your role here?

I think I have you pegged here, don't I?

hardly but you keep drooling all you like for your propensity for believing your own propaganda is legendary.