@divegeester saidYou don't follow along well. My answer has not morphed into something different
Ok so despite you denying it, with obvious outside help you’ve moved from insisting that there are “3 beings” to “1 being” in the trinity.
And now with a little more help after me asking you 20 times how many spirits there are in the trinity, you say one AND three.
This is great š
outside of the time I misspoke, which I have admitted was an error. It has always
been three Persons, one Being. Your doctrine of God who is One and Three is in
contradiction with itself, as well as your doctrine of Jesus' beginning was when He
was born, and He is also Jehovah in the OT; Jesus always was so He could be God
in the OT, or He was not.
02 Jun 22
@kellyjay saidI think your back pedalling on “beings”, your dishonest account of how you came to realise it was wrong, your further dishonest claim that you immediately owned it (you didn’t I had to call you on it) … and now your ludicrous defence of this silly doctrine that there are both ONE and THREE spirits in the trinity… is where I rest my case on this matter kellyjay.
You don't follow along well. My answer has not morphed into something different
outside of the time I misspoke, which I have admitted was an error. It has always
been three Persons, one Being. Your doctrine of God who is One and Three is in
contradiction with itself, as well as your doctrine of Jesus' beginning was when He
was born, and He is also Jehovah in the OT; Jesus always was so He could be God
in the OT, or He was not.
Thank you for your contributions, they have made me smile š
@divegeester saidI think for you, it is easier to talk about me claiming dishonesty than address the
I think your back pedalling on “beings”, your dishonest account of how you came to realise it was wrong, your further dishonest claim that you immediately owned it (you didn’t I had to call you on it) … and now your ludicrous defence of this silly doctrine that there are both ONE and THREE spirits in the trinity… is where I rest my case on this matter kellyjay.
Thank you for your contributions, they have made me smile š
topic, which is what you do a lot with all of the name-callings and insulting you
take part in it, then turn around and complain about names you've been called.
You do seem to take it all personally when you are disagreed with when your
faults and inconsistencies are pointed out to you as if that somehow reflects on
you; when it doesn't, it only reflects on the things we are talking about. Yet you
personalize your criticism and turn them into reasons to insult people personally.
Rest your case; you don't have a case; all you have is a pile of half-truths and
the other half you have not grasped even to explain it properly.
02 Jun 22
@divegeester saidI've explained my doctrine of how God is the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. God is
You’ve made yourself and your doctrine look silly.
Spirit, so when you talk about God and Spirit, you are referring to the Father, Son,
and Holy Spirit.
What you think is weasly or silly isn't important to me; I've grown to expect
nothing more out of you than you give all of the time. You now are all hurt and
bothered by names people call you while you are always calling others names
is sad. If it bothers you, why do you think it doesn't bother others? If you know
it does, why do you do it?
02 Jun 22
@kellyjay saidThank you for your contributions and entertainment.
I've explained my doctrine of how God is the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. God is
Spirit, so when you talk about God and Spirit, you are referring to the Father, Son,
and Holy Spirit.
What you think is weasly or silly isn't important to me; I've grown to expect
nothing more out of you than you give all of the time. You now are all hurt and
bothered by names people cal ...[text shortened]... f it bothers you, why do you think it doesn't bother others? If you know
it does, why do you do it?