In league with Satan

Originally posted by divegeester
Personal experience with what/who I believe is God. However I accept that 'personal experience' can easily be challenged as anything from emotional or psychological or even imagination.

I'm happy with what I believe but I'm not closed minded; I am also happy with my decision to reject religion based on the same reasons as many here reject God. I guess one could say I've not 'thrown the baby out with the bathwater'.

I admit that I have never had anything like what these 'personal experiences' of god tend
to be described as being like.

And I am not sure that I can or would ever experience such things.

However I would recommend listening to this talk from an ex-evangelical Christian preacher
who has experienced this kind of thing and now doesn't believe.

It's a good talk and quite funny even if you don't agree with what he has to say.

YouTube&feature=plcp&context=C48ddc33VDvjVQa1PpcFMsH-3duiHWMiO7q63hHN1hkIeh2GDnKIM=

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Science is nothing more than an understanding of how the Universe and all that is within it works, what humans do with that knowledge is of course another matter.

yes indeed, technology without morality is more dangerous than anything i know.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
pfffft, why not just pony up and say the unscrupulous use of science and technology
has brought us to the point of ecological disaster and for you, science is a God, look
how you look to it for guidance, a panacea for all! All hail the God of science! Lets utter
the mantras, E=Mc^2, offer up incense to Darwinism, oh great Darwin you introduced ...[text shortened]... and brought us as a species to the brink of ecological
disaster, thank you the God of science!

Because it isn't true and wont become true no matter how many times you say it.

Unlike you I care about truth.

Take your straw man arguments elsewhere I already think your an idiot and there is no
need for you to reinforce that image.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes indeed, technology without morality is more dangerous than anything i know.

I disagree, closed minded ignorance is the most dangerous thing i know.

Originally posted by googlefudge
Because it isn't true and wont become true no matter how many times you say it.

Unlike you I care about truth.

Take your straw man arguments elsewhere I already think your an idiot and there is no
need for you to reinforce that image.

shall we talk of the introduction of CFC's into aerosols, the introduction of led into
petrol, the nuclear disasters, deforestation, melting ice caps, desertification,, oil
spillage, acid rain, shall i go on, depleted fish stocks, all due to the unscrupulous use of
technologies and here you are, in denial, meaner and ignorant than the meanest
medieval monk! Truth is not a word you should use lightly and your opinion has no
relevance to anyone but you, despite you're pretensions to the contrary.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
I disagree, closed minded ignorance is the most dangerous thing i know.

No way, unscrupulous scientists involved in weapons programs are way more dangerous!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No way, unscrupulous scientists involved in weapons programs are way more dangerous!

the scientists wouldnt be making weapons if it wasnt for all the closed minded ignorant people buying them (im not defending the scientists actions but it takes two to tango the world to destruction)

Originally posted by Proper Knob
I disagree, closed minded ignorance is the most dangerous thing i know.

I would have gone with faith based belief but yeah what you said.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No way, unscrupulous scientists involved in weapons programs are way more dangerous!

Bearing in mind your confession on this board, i didn't really see you agreeing with me on that one.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
... all due to the unscrupulous use of
technologies ....

Yes and the unscrupulous use of technologies was by society and not by science.

Thank you for making MY point.

Cretin.

Originally posted by googlefudge
Yes and the unscrupulous use of technologies was by society and not by science.

Thank you for making MY point.

Cretin.

so lets get this, a group of scientists which are involved in weapons programs are not
really responsible for any deaths which occur after the use of the technologies which
they themselves sought to introduce, FAIL!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
so lets get this, a group of scientists which are involved in weapons programs are not
really responsible for any deaths which occur after the use of the technologies which
they themselves sought to introduce, FAIL!

Have you taken a 'dumb pill' this morning?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Have you taken a 'dumb pill' this morning?

His arguments do seem to be particularly lacking in sense today.

Maybe he hasn't properly woken up yet.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Have you taken a 'dumb pill' this morning?

is this the best you materialists can really do, errr, excuse Mr. Frankenstein is that your
monster ravaging the village, err, yes, i only created it, nothing to do with me really!

Originally posted by galveston75
The Bible clearly says "you cannot serve two masters". One is either serving God the way that God wants one too or you are not.

Think you have missed the essence of the saying. In this case atheists clearly choose to serve neither. By definition only christians can serve satan as he does not exist outwith their world view.