Go back

"Loving Jesus" and "eternal torture"

Spirituality

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
23 Nov 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonship
Hmmm. I see your point.
Good one.
So you agree that I'm not being decieved by satan?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
27 Nov 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by divegeester
So you agree that I'm not being decieved by satan?
My eyes must have been tired.
I think I misunderstood your sentence.

I think the total equilibrium of God's character is set off if we do not recognize, along with His eternal capacity to love, His corresponding eternal capacity to hate sin.

My point on the deception of God's enemy over the whole world, was to point out that it is not "just you" who is deceived. But to one degree or another we all in the world are still under some amount of deception from Satan.

To your question then "So it is you rather than me who is deceived by Satan?" -

To some degree, in one thing or another, we both are still not totally clear about the truth of Christ.

If I made a specific charge about you being deceived because of a genuine different interpretation of some passages, that is probably going too far - maybe. In other words, I would like to think that I have not been saying everyone who holds a different interpretation from me on a passage is "deceived by Satan".

Without re-reading all the posts, I hope that helps clarify my attitude this morning. Late night tiresome debates are risky.

As said, I am trying to step away from this topic of eternal suffering.

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
28 Nov 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonship
Late night tiresome debates are risky.

I don't suppose I'm the only one who speed reads posts.

I had a shock when I read
"Late night threesome debates" 😲
LOL

No offense intended sonship.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
28 Nov 14

Originally posted by sonship
My eyes must have been tired.
I think I misunderstood your sentence.

I think the total equilibrium of God's character is set off if we do not recognize, along with His eternal capacity to love, His corresponding eternal capacity to hate sin.

My point on the deception of God's enemy over the whole world, was to point out that it is not [i]"just ...[text shortened]... debates are risky.

As said, I am trying to step away from this topic of eternal suffering.
"You went too far, probably maybe" talk about a qualified acceptance of maybe not being 100% right!

I disagree with you and your response is that I'm "being deceived by satan."

I disagree with RJHinds and he says I "deserve to burn in hell"

I disagree with Grampy Bobby and he says I lack the ability to understand

I disagree with Galveston75 and says I'm an antichrist and under the influence of satan

I disagree with some other Christians here and they refuse to acknowledge whether or not they subscribe to the above mentioned opinions

I don't see Christianity in this forum; I see narrow-minded, mean-spirited religionists banging thier drums in the faces of anyone who dares to stand up to them. It's a kind of lightweight fundamentalist extremism, no one will cut my head off but they're happy for me to burn in hell.

What a bunch.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
28 Nov 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by divegeester
"You went too far, probably maybe" talk about a qualified acceptance of maybe not being 100% right!

I disagree with you and your response is that I'm "being deceived by satan."

I disagree with RJHinds and he says I "deserve to burn in hell"

I disagree with Grampy Bobby and he says I lack the ability to understand

I disagree with Galveston75 a ...[text shortened]... xtremism, no one will cut my head off but they're happy for me to burn in hell.

What a bunch.
What are you trying to do, stir up a debate ? ?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
Clock
28 Nov 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wolfgang59
I don't suppose I'm the only one who speed reads posts.

I had a shock when I read
"Late night threesome debates" 😲
LOL

No offense intended sonship.
I thought I wrote "late night tiresome debates".

That's what I meant.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
28 Nov 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonship
What are you trying to do, stir up a debate ? ?
I do think your main redeeming quality is that you do have a SoH.

😉

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.