@kellyjay saidIs there any evidence here at RHP that "the Spirit of God is in you"? I mean, you only talk about doctrine: you never seem to talk about walking the walk and/or issues that surround us from the viewpoint of someone who claims to have "the Spirit of God" in them.
If all you do is try to follow the letter, you'll lose, if the Spirit of God isn't in you, all your efforts will be in vain.
1 edit
@kellyjay saidRelax. Try to engage in the discussion instead of preaching at me. I cited Matthew 7–3 as an example of a passage which makes no sense interpreted literally. People do not really have tree trunks in their eyes. It is a metaphorical image. Given that we have identified a passage which makes no sense if read literally, we can apply this same insight to another passage: Namely, the garden of Eden. Does it not strike you as extremely improbable that there was a real talking snake? Does it not strike you that it is much more probable that the author of the garden of Eden story, like Matthew, was employing a literary device? The talking snake is a poetic image which represents temptation. That rescues the essential message of the story without requiring people to believe in absurdities.
If all you do is try to follow the letter, you'll lose, if the Spirit of God isn't in you, all your efforts will be in vain.
@moonbus saidYou can not tell the difference between literally speaking and metaphorically?
Relax. Try to engage in the discussion instead of preaching at me. I cited Matthew 7–3 as an example of a passage which makes no sense interpreted literally. People do not really have tree trunks in their eyes. It is a metaphorical image. Given that we have identified a passage which makes no sense if read literally, we can apply this same insight to another passage: Namely, ...[text shortened]... That rescues the essential message of the story without requiring people to believe in absurdities.
