@avalanchethecat
I don't think you or I could have written a book as profound as Genesis.
Let's start here.
The dichotomy facing man was not good or evil.
Good and evil were on the same tree.
It was "the tree of the knowledge of good and evil"
Now my opinion is that right out the gate, this matter of "the knowledge of good and evil" being on one side of the choice before man to life is too wise.
I would wager that any human being, even a modern philosopher or psychologist would have written a myth in which man was before two trees.
a tree of good
and a tree of evil.
Like the Greek myth of Pandora's box having all the evils come out of it.
That is not Genesis. Man was created neutral between to ultimate sources of his existence:
The tree of life
The tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
I have contemplated this for fifty years. In my opinion, only God Himself could have had the wisdom to show us that kind of dichotomy of ultimate choices before man.
Why is LIFE put in opposition to the KNOWLEDGE of Good and Evil ?
Why do you think the story is written that way?
@sonship saidOh I entirely disagree. It's a good story, I'll give you that, but I expect that's why it's survived all these years. I've read better though.
@avalanchethecat
I don't think you or I could have written a book as profound as Genesis.
Let's start here.
The dichotomy facing man was not good or evil.
Good and evil were on the same tree.
It was "the tree of the knowledge of good and evil"
Now my opinion is that right out the gate, this matter of "the knowledge of good and evil" being on one ...[text shortened]... position to the KNOWLEDGE of Good and Evil ?
Why do you think the story is written that way?
Your argument is baseless. You're not comparing science to god, you're comparing science to some stories written by men who claim to have been directed or influenced by god. How is this not obvious to you?
Excuse me.
Why cannot God communicate with man with human words ?
Why cannot God communicate with us in terms that the most can grasp the meaning?
You know a really good teacher can break things down in a way that communicates with the most people.
What if God in His infinite wisdom decided beforehand that to convey the most important things about our existence to the ages kicked off history like this:
A couple in a paradise setting within two sources of them to go forward to live.
Independently from their God via a "tree of the knowledge of good evil" or
dependently forever on the uncreated Divine living Person God via a "tree of life"?
Simple - somewhat.
Naïve, woefully pre-scientific- childish-foolish ??? Maybe not.
Suppose God the eternal Creator has an enemy - one created perfect yet turned against God to usurp His position.
How about God in His wisdom communicate this down through the ages of mankind by starting history off with a situation where a serpent could be utilized by this supernatural being, this enemy of God Himself?
"Now the serpent was more crafty than any other animal of the field that Jehovah God had made. And he said to the woman, Did God really say, You shall not eat of any tree of the garden?"
Simple - Yes, somewhat.
Woefully naïve and pre-scientific fairy story? Maybe not.
Let's read on see what else this book the Bible says.
@sonship saidOh let's not, I've read it before and have no interest in reading in company. I've read your scripture and others, they're all much the same. Honestly, I prefer the Greek stories, at least their gods are consistent.
@avalanchethecatYour argument is baseless. You're not comparing science to god, you're comparing science to some stories written by men who claim to have been directed or influenced by god. How is this not obvious to you?
Excuse me.
Why cannot God communicate with man with human words ?
Why cannot God communicate with us in terms that the most can ...[text shortened]... and pre-scientific fairy story? Maybe not.
Let's read on see what else this book the Bible says.
Oh I entirely disagree. It's a good story, I'll give you that, but I expect that's why it's survived all these years. I've read better though.
Okay. What is the "better" creation account you read ?
Don't dodge me now.
Give me a name.
Please no "But I have, you see, this other problem over here."
Name your better source for the creation of human life in the universe.
@avalanchethecat
Let me ask you.
You say Jesus could not be God speaking to us.
Besides the words from Jesus what other person's speaking do you suspect MORE likely represent the heart and authority of God being conveyed to our race?
Like - "Jesus Christ is ok. But God was more likely to be speaking through ______ ?
Socrates?
Darwin?
Stephen Hawking?
Who would you suggests is more likely an utterer of the mind of God?
@sonship saidNah. Not interested in arguing the toss with you over creation myths. There are none that I believe are true, so I have no dog in that race.
@avalanchethecatOh I entirely disagree. It's a good story, I'll give you that, but I expect that's why it's survived all these years. I've read better though.
Okay. What is the "better" creation account you read ?
Don't dodge me now.
Give me a name.
Please no "But I have, you see, this other problem over here."
Name your better source for the creation of human life in the universe.
@sonship saidJesus never wrote the bible.
@avalanchethecat
Let me ask you.
You say Jesus could not be God speaking to us.
Besides the words from Jesus what other person's speaking do you suspect MORE likely represent the heart and authority of God being conveyed to our race?
Like - "Jesus Christ is ok. But God was more likely to be speaking through ______ ?
Socrates?
Darwin?
Stephen Hawking?
Who would you suggests is more likely an utterer of the mind of God?
@sonship saidGod's character doesn't fare well in it.
@avalanchethecat
I don't think you or I could have written a book as profound as Genesis.
@avalanchethecat
You have nothing. I can see that.
Being nonchalant and in the dark is possible.
@avalanchethecat
Yes, God is the author of the bible.
And "the Word became flesh".
I can see you have no viable alternatives.
I won't bother you further for any better guidance.
Now, being invaded by a someone is evident not only in Romans.
It is rather strongly evidenced in Genesis.
God told Cain that sin was lurking close to his heart ready to pounce on him much as Paul taught in Romans 7 and Ephesians 2.
When Cain was furious with religious jealousy because God had accepted his brother Abel's offering but rejected his God warned -
"And Jehovah said to Cain, Why are you angry, and why has your countenance fallen? If you do well, will not your countenance be lifted up? And if you do not well, sin is crouching at the door; and his desire is for you, but you must rule over him." (Gen. 4:7)
This is amazing. So many centuries before Paul wrote of sin deceiving, killing, taking opportunity, and acting like a personified force in man Moses records God's words. Sin in Cain the first murder was crouching at the door.
Surely God meant crouching at the door of his heart.
Something entered into man's being upon the eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. This something was intentionally crouching at the door of the psychological heart of sinners seeking to pull them down into pure evil.
Spoiler alert - "the knowledge of good and evil" became to Adam only the knowledge. It did not mean he would have the power of life to resist evil or perform always the good that he knew.
@sonship saidRidiculous.
@avalanchethecat
Yes, God is the author of the bible.
And "the Word became flesh".
I can see you have no viable alternatives.
I won't bother you further for any better guidance.
@avalanchethecat
I gave you ample chance to show how your guidance is better on the big questions of life. You have nothing apparently but rocking chair scoffs at others who have guidance.
Unless I haven't yet seen some guiding wisdom posted on these questions nothing from you seems more approvable then the Bible.
I'll check again latter.
@sonship saidYou speak of the Bible as though it was one coherent book, as opposed to a collection of books brought together by a group of fallible human beings who discarded the ones they didn't like.
@avalanchethecat
I gave you ample chance to show how your guidance is better on the big questions of life. You have nothing apparently but rocking chair scoffs at others who have guidance.
Unless I haven't yet seen some guiding wisdom posted on these questions nothing from you seems more approvable then the Bible.
I'll check again latter.