@fmf saidBecause nothing you have said beyond the part you cannot answer is meaningful to human life alone. All other life is unique, nothing special about that its all like that common among every lifeform there is. If you removed the word human from your text no one would know what you were talking about, could have been kittens.
But "unique" isn't the only word I used to explain myself. I used it in some sentences in conjunction with other words. Why are you talking about "dogs"?
05 Mar 19
@kellyjay saidOur capacity for projecting ourselves in abstract ways and affecting people and also our capacity to be affected and influenced and shaped by the abstractions projected by other people;
What sets us apart from all other life?
our ability to remember, learn and adapt to these interactions [i.e. our personal narrative that each of us, individually and exclusively, has access to;
and our ability to form a moral compass based on all this in order to govern our interactions with others.
This stuff is what sets us apart from all other life.
05 Mar 19
@kellyjay saidIf there is a creator being then we presumably have in common with all life forms that we were created by it/him. I don't have any problem seeing what sets us apart from all other life; if you do have a problem with that, I am not sure what I can say to you.
What sets us apart from all other life?
The one thing I thought you said that did, you cannot talk to.
If all you got is we are different and all other life is too, is that worth saying?
05 Mar 19
@kellyjay saidI will post my stab at an answer to question again here:
I think we are all unique, but so is every other lifeform, dogs are unique from one another.
I think our humanity ~ whether we be theists or atheists ~ draws on the fact we are evidently endowed with a capacity for projecting ourselves in abstract ways and also we are affected and influenced and shaped by the abstract projections of other people.
Added to this, we clearly have individual spirits ~ perhaps the same thing that most religionists refer to as a "soul" although they see it differently from a non-believer and non-superstitious person like me ~ which comprise personality, uniqueness, relationships, and other abstract aspects all bound together in the singular personal narrative that each of us accumulates as we live our lives.
Therefore, I see our humanity – and perhaps even the ‘purpose’ of being humans, at least for me – as being about loving and being loved and learning and helping others to learn about our species and our world in the time we have before we die and cease to exist. That’s our common humanity, I’d say.
If you think all that could just as well be about dogs as it could be about humans, then I am truly stumped.
@secondson saidYou said you didnt believe me when I said I believed in the bodily risen Christ. That’s the same as calling me a liar.
When I call you a liar, I'll say you're a liar.
05 Mar 19
@secondson saidThere is nothing to “deflect”, all you are doing is restating the words in the text and berating me for not taking them literally, this is not debating Jospehw.
And neither is your penchant for skirting the discussion with deflections like the one above.
05 Mar 19
@philokalia saidNo I don’t mean that all.
Yiu mean your approach to the concept that man is created in the image of God?
05 Mar 19
@secondson saidWhat assertion have I made that is not supported by biblical text?
Exactly. Divegeester makes an assertion without a proof text, and then continuously reasserts the idea as though it's true just because you're either too stupid to understand it or he thinks he's more spiritually mature, or both.
Like the proof texts you provided that refuted his idea that only Adam was created in God's image. What does that make the rest of humanity, chopped liver?
@secondson saidI think if you had more to say which contributed to the discourse you would post more. Flinging insult around and calling people heretics and fake Christians dilutes the already meagre contribution you make here.
Well, I guess what you said in your last two posts above makes sense. I made, this post makes 37 I think, posts all day. Maybe two hours of total time posting spread out over a twelve hour period.
I counted your forum posts and the total was 96 up to this point today.
Sometimes you were making a post about every three minutes. You took about a six hour break at one p ...[text shortened]... arget date to start the race to get as many posters going at once.
Time for me to get some sleep.
@kellyjay saidI follow most of your exchanges and it is amusing to watch you drift along coughing up your dogma furballs spouting your opinion, claiming your opinion doesn’t matter, inferring all your posts are “truth”, dodging direct questions with waffle and then pretending all blinky-eyed that you don’t know where the post was that you didn’t answer.
He attempts to accuse people of not responding to a specific post. If he actually cared about a point, he could just repeat the point informing who he was talking to that it was missed. You can find him and another here doing the same thing, accusing others of dodging while never simply repeating a missed point. More about screwing with people than real conversations.