05 Mar 19
@fmf saidI am unclear how we are or were evidently endowed with abilities, without one or something that could do that. Projecting anything isn’t a material modification.
I think our humanity ~ whether we be theists or atheists ~ draws on the fact we are evidently endowed with a capacity for projecting ourselves in abstract ways and also we are affected and influenced and shaped by the abstract projections of other people.
Added to this, we clearly have individual spirits ~ perhaps the same thing that most religionists refer to as a "soul" alt ...[text shortened]... convince themselves they have a shot at everlasting life, I am not saying ‘This life is not enough’.
@fmf saidYou can give credit wherever you deemed it should go. The idea something that isn’t materialistic can be given to humanity, seems to scream something other than an unguided blind processes did something out of the materialistic universe.
Well, as you know, because I have said it umpteen times before, it could have been a creator being.
05 Mar 19
@secondson saidNow we went from "a tree is a tree is a tree" to "exege[sis]". We're coming up in the world, at least.
Don't be silly. That's a terrible example to use as a rebuff.
Everyone knows that a "week" means 7 years. Why in the world would it say "as a week". It's a simple idiom like many others in the scriptures.
There are numerous idioms, allegories, metaphors and symbolisms used throughout scripture, and anyone that can exegete correctly knows they must consider the context and compare scripture with scripture to arrive at a sound interpretation.
05 Mar 19
@kellyjay saidIt could be because of a creator entity or being or it could be simply the way our species evolved.
You can give credit wherever you deemed it should go. The idea something that isn’t materialistic can be given to humanity, seems to scream something other than an unguided blind processes did something out of the materialistic universe.
Seeing as I have no reason to believe such a creator being has given us any definition or explanation, or instructions, or threats or promises, it's moot for me.
Does your personal opinion about "unguided blind processes" mean that you can't think of anything else to say about my brief takes on what it is to be human, the worth of a human, and on humanity in general?
@kellyjay saidThe capacity for abstraction - the ability to witness and act upon our unique narratives - and the moral compass that guides those acts - might or might not have been "given to humanity".
The idea something that isn’t materialistic can be given to humanity, seems to scream something other than an unguided blind processes did something out of the materialistic universe.
But I think we can still examine questions like "What does it mean to be human?", "Is there a common worth we all share?" and "What is your view of humanity?" even if no one knows for sure.
@fmf saidI'm not really interested in the what you think a creator has given with definitions, explanations, instructions, threats, or promises so you don't have to concern yourself answering for those things. What you did suggest was really the only thing I asked about, no need to add to that question. I'm also not interested in what could have been, you picked words that carry a meaning beyond evolutionary theory as far as I can tell. If you have some grasp of how material that is once dead, became alive, then became aware to the point of having the"... capacity for projecting ourselves in abstract ways" I'm interested in hearing about that! What combination of chemicals over time could produce such a thing?
It could be because of a creator entity or being or it could be simply the way our species evolved.
Seeing as I have no reason to believe such a creator being has given us any definition or explanation, or instructions, or threats or promises, it's moot for me.
Does your personal opinion about "unguided blind processes" mean that you can't think of anything else to say about my brief takes on what it is to be human, the worth of a human, and on humanity in general?
05 Mar 19
@kellyjay saidAre you unable to discuss our common humanness with me if you and I don't agree on the "how material that is once dead, became alive" issue?
If you have some grasp of how material that is once dead, became alive, then became aware to the point of having the"... capacity for projecting ourselves in abstract ways" I'm interested in hearing about that!
05 Mar 19
@kellyjay saidOur humanness could be because of a creator entity but I have no reason to believe such a creator being has given us any definition or explanation. So, if we are to find some common ground in talking about our common humanness, it would have to be without having to get into your religious beliefs or getting into a discussion about evolutionary science.
Not part of this discussion unless you make it so.
@fmf saidSure, and I picked a part of your statement and I'm trying to get you to tell me the what, where, why, and how when it comes to "...capacity for projecting ourselves in abstract ways" What was the mechanism that did this? If we are all built this way according to your views, what lead you to them? How do you justify this as something important and why do it matter with respect to our common humanity? If it is an evolutionary process responsible what lead you to that conclusion?
Are you unable to discuss our common humanness with me if you and I don't agree on the "how material that is once dead, became alive" issue?
05 Mar 19
@kellyjay saidI don't know. But - supernatural cause or no supernatural cause - what about our humanness? Do you agree with this for example: I believe our each and every humanness is the accumulation of billions of unique and almost limitlessly complex personal narratives and moral compasses, which in tandem make us individuals, and "humanity" is all of us interacting with each other as we navigate the journey of life.
What combination of chemicals over time could produce such a thing?