20 Apr 13
Originally posted by FMFHas it irked you FMF that you are a legend? your modesty prevents you no doubt from accepting the accolade.
You keep talking about "trolling". Over and over and over again. We have been having a pretty civil discussion here, robbie. Why not move your banter about "trolling" and "legendary troll" etc, etc, etc, to the "robbie carrobie" thread like I have suggested?
20 Apr 13
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWe have been having a pretty civil discussion here, robbie. You can expound on your 'FMF is a legendary troll' thing on the other thread, surely.
Has it irked you FMF that you are a legend? your modesty prevents you no doubt from accepting the accolade.
edit: I have responded to it on that other thread.
20 Apr 13
Originally posted by FMFOk, but I may feel the need to remind you of your legendary status at some point in the future by heaping further accolades upon you and offering up incense to your majesty.
We have been having a pretty civil discussion here, robbie. You can expound on your 'FMF is a legendary troll' thing on the other thread, surely.
20 Apr 13
1 edit
Originally posted by SuzianneThe JW organisation is not a denomination it is a religious cult.
I am a Christian, and yet not of robbie's denomination...
As several of us here try to get Robbin and Galveston to admit, it is JW teaching that you cannot access gods grace unless you are a member of the temporal organisation and if you leave it you lose it. No christian mainstream claims this except possibly the Catholic church.
The Jehovah's witness organisation is a religious cult, this is why it is so difficult to get Robbin and Galveston to admit the doctrine because they know what it implies and they are counselled not to say so explicitly to avoid the accusation.
It is why I go after it every time and always will.
20 Apr 13
2 edits
Originally posted by divegeesteryawn if you ever come up with anything original in your lifetime, let us know, you don't even know how to define a cult, in fact, i am surprised you can spell it. Once again these trolls have turned a perfectly good thread, open for discussion into a bitchin fest for their ignorance and prejudices.
The JW organisation is not a denomination it is a religious cult.
As several of us here try to get Robbin and Galveston to admit, it is JW teaching that you cannot access gods grace unless you are a member of the temporal organisation and if you leave it you lose it. No christian mainstream claims this except possibly the Catholic church.
The Jeh y so explicitly to avoid the accusation.
It is why I go after it every time and always will.
20 Apr 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieCan you clarify then, does a person need to be a member of the Jehovah's Witness church/organisation in order to access salvation/paradise/afterlife, (whatever you refer to it as)?
yawn if you ever come up with aything original in your lifetime, let us know, you dont even know how to define a cult, infact, i am suprised you can spell it. Once again these trolls have turned a perfectly good thread, open for discussion into a bitchin fest for their ignorance and prejudices.
20 Apr 13
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou weren't mysterious about this quote, because if my memory serves me correctly you didn't even know your organisation professed such a stance. Something I find remarkable.
I am not mysterious about it, I simply keep needing to reel you people in, you are all so wired to da moon! 😛
- Joined
- 08 Dec 04
- Moves
- 100919
20 Apr 13
Originally posted by RJHindsMaybe this will explain it ....in different words..
So you are saying that all the elements that make up the earth being melted together is used by God to make a "new" or "renewed" earth that is different from the first earth, right? Remember, the first heaven and the first earth has passed away, according to Revelation 21. It also says there is no sea left from the first earth. That must be because the wa ...[text shortened]... t be remembered or come to mind."
(Isaiah 65:17 NKJV)
This is in Hebrew, not Greek.
http://www.israelofgod.org/newheavens.htm
20 Apr 13
Originally posted by checkbaiterThis is in error. The commentator is making things up that are not said in scripture and changing the word of God into a Lie. I suggest that you pay no attention to this false teacher. Your should just ignore all that stuff in red letters.
Maybe this will explain it ....in different words..
http://www.israelofgod.org/newheavens.htm
20 Apr 13
1 edit
Originally posted by divegeesterWell, it's nothing new. The Mormons, and to some extent the Catholics, do the same thing. I don't see how you can sort out the JWs for this.
The JW organisation is not a denomination it is a religious cult.
As several of us here try to get Robbin and Galveston to admit, it is JW teaching that you cannot access gods grace unless you are a member of the temporal organisation and if you leave it you lose it. No christian mainstream claims this except possibly the Catholic church.
The Jeh y so explicitly to avoid the accusation.
It is why I go after it every time and always will.
20 Apr 13
Originally posted by SuzianneToday we have a lot of false religions and cults out there trying to replace Christ as the only way to God and the only source of truth.
Well, it's nothing new. The Mormons, and to some extent the Catholics, do the same thing. I don't see how you can sort out the JWs for this.
20 Apr 13
Originally posted by RJHindsIt seems that the bible is great at teaching confusion and division amongst religions! As matter of interest, how many religions has the bible spawned,all of which claim to be the "divinely inspired" correct interpretation ?
Today we have a lot of false religions and cults out there trying to replace Christ as the only way to God and the only source of truth.
20 Apr 13
Originally posted by OdBodactually the Bible teaches quite the opposite but you would have to read it to know that.
It seems that the bible is great at teaching confusion and division amongst religions! As matter of interest, how many religions has the bible spawned,all of which claim to be the "divinely inspired" correct interpretation ?