- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
04 Jun 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterEveryone knows your internal debate and consideration is confined to two choices:
Time for a sandwich I think...now, what type shall I have...hmmm
😵
a) PB&J with the crusts cut off
b) PB&J on open spread with the crusts cut off.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Originally posted by @divegeesterCongradulations. I am totally stumped.
Time for a sandwich I think...now, what type shall I have...hmmm
😵
(You need a question mark after "what type shall I have?" )
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Originally posted by @divegeesterOh come on Divegeester. You can't micro control everything on the Forum.
Let me know when you are brave enough to take my question challenge 😉
If you have a real good question ask it.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Originally posted by @divegeester
Let me know when you are brave enough to take my question challenge
Demonstration of machismo is not my priority.
Ascertaining where the truth lies is.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Originally posted by @divegeester
As soon as you feel your balls of steel return, let me know and we can discuss the "question challenge".
Demonstration of machismo is not my priority.
Considering your question in the light of the word of God to ascertain where the good interpretation more likely lies is.
Originally posted by @sonshipYou are just dodging now sonship.
Demonstration of machismo is not my priority.
Ascertaining where the truth lies is.
You keep claiming that I back away from your questions, so I’m asking you to let me know when you are ready to take my question challenge as laid out a while back in amongst all your obfuscation.
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
Originally posted by @divegeesterThe obfuscation seems to me to be coming from you.
You are just dodging now sonship.
You keep claiming that I back away from your questions, so I’m asking you to let me know when you are ready to take my question challenge as laid out a while back in amongst all your obfuscation.
if you still insist on what one poster said was "a memorandum of understanding" what am I to assume other than you're [not] confident in your question's power yourself?
05 Jun 18
Originally posted by @sonshipLet me know when you are brave enough to take my question challenge
The obfuscation seems to me to be coming from you.
if you still insist on what one poster said was "a memorandum of understanding" what am I to assume other than you're [not] confident in your question's power yourself?
- Joined
- 03 Jan 13
- Moves
- 13080
05 Jun 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterLet me know when you stop beating your wife.
Let me know when you are brave enough to take my question challenge
06 Jun 18
Originally posted by @divegeesterThe belief is actually that hell is not a literal fire at all. It is compared to a fire because that is what might have some kind of parallel with it.
In eternal hell, where this odd version of the loving Jesus who died for the world he loved so much, will be burning alive for eternity those who reject his love...what will be the fuel for the flames?
Eternity is a long time, so will there be an eternal butane cylinder or will Jesus employ some other means of keeping the lake of eternal suffering in a state of optimal heat?
Hell is more about the loneliness and total isolation from God's love.
so it's "fuel" is that there is none of the fuel of God's love and presence.
Of course, this is speculative as we do not have much to go on concerning the nature of hell. But the very premise of this question is wrong.
06 Jun 18
Originally posted by @philokaliaYou appear to be using a person who agrees with you as a proxy ~ yet again ~ so you don't have to confront the poster who actually 'preaches' the thing you disagree with?
The belief is actually that hell is not a literal fire at all.