Go back
Who of the “trinity” became flesh?

Who of the “trinity” became flesh?

Spirituality


1 edit

-Removed-
Then how do you know I'm pretending?

Sounds like you want your cake and to eat it too.
You've no clue what I do and don't understand.
But you're cock sure I am pretending not to understand.

On the day, the event and time when 1 Cor. 15:28 says "then the Son Himself also will be subjected to Him who has subjected all things to Him, that God may be all in all" where will Jesus Christ be?

Is it that I look round and He is no longer there or in existence?
Is it that He is just an ordinary man with no deity any longer?

On the day right after He "hands over" [or delivers up] the kingdom to His God and Father, WHERE is He?


3 edits

-Removed-
The questions that I asked immediately before this post were designed so that I would understand you. If you're overcome by suspicion and mistrust I can do nothing about that.

On the day, the event and time when 1 Cor. 15:28 says "then the Son Himself also will be subjected to Him who has subjected all things to Him, that God may be all in all" where will Jesus Christ be?

Is it that I look round and He is no longer there or in existence?
Is it that He is just an ordinary man with no deity any longer?

On the day right after He "hands over" [or delivers up] the kingdom to His God and Father, WHERE is He?


4 edits

@divegeester

The answer to your question is that I will re-examine and see if there has been something I have misunderstood you to be meaning.

This answer of "Yes I will re-examine" is not a complete agreement with you on your first paragraph's indictment.

I have said on this forum a few times before, my style of apologetics is mainly to show why what may be a problem to someone else is not a problem to me. I do not intend to bludgeon anyone down to submission World Wrestling like. Rather I just
aim to say - "You have an objection to my faith? Here's why that particular problem to you is not a problem to me."

So explain if you wish.

Vote Up
Vote Down


@sonship said
@divegeester

The answer to your question is that I will re-examine and see if there has been something I have misunderstood you to be meaning.

This answer of "Yes I will re-examine" is not a complete agreement with you on your first paragraph's indictment.

I have said on this forum a few times before, my style of apologetics is mainly to show why what may be a pro ...[text shortened]... ith? Here's why that particular problem to you is not a problem to me."

So explain if you wish.
I don’t wish to be argumentative, but why do believe that your God has there people in him?

Vote Up
Vote Down


@divegeester
Yes.

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@divegeester

I misread your question.
I was rushing and thought is said "Would you like me to explain?"
My answer was "Yes."

Then coming back I noticed it was "What would you like me to explain?"

Explain what I said in the immediately previous posts about what happens to Christ after He "hands over" or "delivers up the kingdom" to His God and Father. Explain what you mean about that terminating Christ's office as Son of God.

Now, I have something I might write to Mercury. So excuse me while I give him some attention.


-Removed-
Do you think your shifting to ask me about my behavior will defend your unitarian denial of Christ's eternal Deity?


-Removed-
Do you yours?


-Removed-
Just sing like there's no tomorrow, Mr. Orison Fruitgate.

Leave all such mentatious nigglings behind.

Let the mystical song of Christ light up the world, through you.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.