Worse things than disbelief?

Originally posted by @fmf
Look it up. I detect no genuine interest.

I am genuinely interested because agnostic and atheist don’t go together at all. Do you remember describing yourself in that way?

Originally posted by @romans1009
I wish you’d look into that memory patch I mentioned. It’s called Rivastigmine and it’s for short-term memory problems. As I said earlier, it works wonders (very effective) but is not cheap.

You also need a prescription from a doctor to get it. Just print out a few of the threads from this forum and give them to your physician. You’ll have no problem getting a prescription.

This kind of banter reflects poorly on you.

Originally posted by @fmf
So you believe that "judgment" is about weeding out 'mere' "head belief".

Is "head belief" something that involves "accepting Jesus as one's Lord and saviour"? Or does it involve pointedly NOT accepting that?

What happens if someone "accepts Jesus as his Lord and saviour", does good works, but has 'mere' "head belief"? Is it "damnation" for him?

This is a total misrepresentation of what he said. But you knew that.

Originally posted by @romans1009
I am genuinely interested because agnostic and atheist don’t go together at all. Do you remember describing yourself in that way?

Look it up. I already know what it means. You don't. If you honestly think "agnostic and atheist don’t go together" then it should have pricked your curiosity sufficiently to look into it.

Originally posted by @suzianne
This is a total misrepresentation of what he said.

I disagree.

Originally posted by @fmf
You should adopt whatever theology you want. You don't devote enough of your posts to it for my taste.

Rajk999's theology and his theological debates here are one of the most interesting things that go on on this forum.

It's also very interesting to see how many of the attempted 'rebuttals' rely on misrepresenting what he actually believes.

I don't know where you got the idea that I am telling you what theology you should have. It's daft.

Of course it's interesting to you because he hates Christians almost as much as you do.

Originally posted by @suzianne
Of course it's interesting to you because he hates Christians almost as much as you do.

I don't hate Christians, Suzianne. It's an interesting theological debate.

Originally posted by @fmf
This kind of banter reflects poorly on you.

I’m being serious. I don’t know if Rivastigmine is available where you live but it’s worth checking. It apparently works best when applied to the upper back (don’t know why) so for maximum benefit you may need a significant other or friend to assist.

The good news is one patch lasts for 24 hours so you won’t have to change it more than once a day.

Originally posted by @fmf
Huh? I don't understand ~ you say it "looked like" that? What does that even mean? It "looked like" I said something?

"What?"


Too lazy.

Originally posted by @romans1009
I’m being serious. I don’t know if Rivastigmine is available where you live but it’s worth checking. It apparently works best when applied to the upper back (don’t know why) so for maximum benefit you may need a significant other or friend to assist.

The good news is one patch lasts for 24 hours so you won’t have to change it more than once a day.

This kind of message board stuff is water off a duck's back to me. If you'd been here longer, you'd know.

Originally posted by @js357
To me, it vindicates the conclusion that time spent analyzing the character of God is actually time spent analyzing the character of the individual human who is promoting the particular God-concept under discussion. I wonder how much time they spend imagining tortures the unsaved will undergo. It's not healthy.

And neither is assuming that this is what they spend their time on.

Originally posted by @suzianne
"What?"


Too lazy.

If Romans1009 wants to look up "agnostic atheism", he's free to. There was a whole thread or thread sub-topic about it only a few weeks back which I contributed to quite a lot. I already know what the term means.

Originally posted by @fmf
Look it up. I already know what it means. You don't. If you honestly think "agnostic and atheist don’t go together" then it should have pricked your curiosity sufficiently to look into it.

It’s interesting that you spend this much time and typing saying why you won’t answer a question when actually answering the question would be so much quicker and simpler.

Did you forget why you called yourself an agnostic atheist? Is that the problem? Stop hiding in the shadows and torturing yourself.

Originally posted by @romans1009
It’s interesting that you spend this much time and typing saying why you won’t answer a question when actually answering the question would be so much quicker and simpler.

Did you forget why you called yourself an agnostic atheist? Is that the problem? Stop hiding in the shadows and torturing yourself.

Start a thread about it. In the process of doing so you will find out what the term means.

Originally posted by @romans1009
Did you forget why you called yourself an agnostic atheist? Is that the problem?

Silly banter.