09 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009This seems like a false dilemma. So one thing you could think is easier than another thing you could think, therefore the thing you think is easier to think must be right? Who has claimed... "to know all the ways of an omniscient, eternal and completely holy God"?
I also previously said reviewing the evidence and coming to a conclusion about it was much easier and more possible than trying to know all the ways of an omniscient, eternal and completely holy God.
Originally posted by @fmfIf you think you have the ability to know God and all of God’s ways with your finite mind and limited understanding and perspective, I would suggest you are mistaken.
This assertion you are making about there being enough evidence exists for Jesus Christ’s divinity can perhaps be attributed to the finite mind and limited understanding and perspective that you are admitting you have and might be just as wrong as what my mind believes and what a Hindu's mind believes. Your "finite mind and limited understanding and perspective" thing is a weak point to be making. Perhaps it's more suited to preaching to the choir.
09 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009JS357 posted something
I’m just not big on people who deliberately tell falsehoods. But I’m not going to debate something this silly and easily any longer as it can easily be checked.
I replied to JS357.
You replied to my reply to JS357
You couldn't detect the parody.
You keep insisting your reply was to a post addressed to you.
You couldn't even discern that its content was satirical.
You are too proud to go an look. It's all on page 11.
09 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009I ask again: Who is it you think has claimed... "to know all the ways of an omniscient, eternal and completely holy God"?
If you think you have the ability to know God and all of God’s ways with your finite mind and limited understanding and perspective, I would suggest you are mistaken.
09 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009I don't know what you're on about.
I’ll think about answering that after some of my questions have been answered 🙂
09 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Did you not read what I said in my post to Suzianne?
Well for starters, what did you mean when you called yourself an agnostic atheist?
09 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Rhetorical questions? Clumsy piss take questions about what I had for breakfast and the like? Clumsy loaded questions? I am not aware of anything serious or genuine pending.
There’s a bunch more but that one’s at least current.
09 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009The standard meaning. It's a bog standard term.
Yes, that’s why I’m asking. Agnostic atheist sounds contradictory and I didn’t know what you mesnt by it.
But I’m not gonna pull teeth to get an answer. It’s not worth it.
09 Feb 18
Originally posted by @fmfWell for starters what did you mean when you referred to the judgment (you referenced it a few times with me and other posters.)
Rhetorical questions? Clumsy piss take questions about what I had for breakfast and the like? Clumsy loaded questions? I am not aware of anything serious or genuine pending.
Were you referring to the judgment in Romans or Revelation?
Originally posted by @fmfOk, I’m not familiar with the standard meaning. Can you identify what the standard meaning is?
The standard meaning. It's a bog standard term.
09 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009The superstitious notion that there is a decision made about the destination, so to speak, of each human after they die.
Well for starters what did you mean when you referred to the judgment (you referenced it a few times with me and other posters.)