Originally posted by @jacob-vervilleIf you think whatever you have typed somewhere else answers the question waiting for you on either of two threads on this forum, copy paste it onto one of them. If you don't, then I will presume you are just running away from a discussion on this Spirituality Forum.
Actually, yes, I totally answers this question in
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/debates/rights-virtues-and-development.175787
The thread is still active and going well.
Please do stop by and we can discuss it at length.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @fmf“Shoveling nonsense” referred to how you respond when you’ve been bested in a debate or a debate point. Rather than concede the loss or say your opponent made a good point and you’d like to reflect on it, you employ tools of distraction. It’s obvious and I suspect to more than just me.
I hear what you say but maybe your belief system is sustained by "your foolish and unwarranted pride" too. Maybe you too are mistaken. Maybe you are "shovelling nonsense".Maybe it's not just me.
And my belief system has nothing to do with pride. Accepting that God exists and accepting Him as one’s Lord is not compatible with pride.
07 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Maybe all these personal deficiencies you have been listing in the last few posts, something which you are doing, it would seem, because we believe different things, also apply to you and your thinking. Maybe it's not just me.
“Shoveling nonsense” referred to how you respond when you’ve been bested in a debate or a debate point. Rather than concede the loss or say your opponent made a good point and you’d like to reflect on it, you employ tools of distraction. It’s obvious and I suspect to more than just me.
And my belief system has nothing to do with pride. Accepting that God exists and accepting Him as one’s Lord is not compatible with pride.
07 Feb 18
Originally posted by @fmfI guess you'll have to wait.
If you think whatever you have typed somewhere else answers the question waiting for you on either of two threads on this forum, copy paste it onto one of them. If you don't, then I will presume you are just running away from a discussion on this Spirituality Forum.
I need to create a version of the post that is actually specifically topical to spirituality.
If I post something that isn't topical to it, and more topical to debate, I violate the intent of the Forums in general.
I have no idea why you can't just pop on over there.
The debate is really going well and it's exactly what you would've wanted.
I don't want to start a second thread here partly because I'm already discussing it!
07 Feb 18
Originally posted by @jacob-vervilleGood. Do that. I'll wait.
I need to create a version of the post that is actually specifically topical to spirituality.
Originally posted by @jacob-vervilleI have already started a thread here. Use that. Thread 175779
I don't want to start a second thread here partly because I'm already discussing it!
07 Feb 18
Originally posted by @fmfI've not hated a thread title so much in my entire life, lol, no.
I have already started a thread here. Use that. Thread 175779
07 Feb 18
Originally posted by @jacob-vervilleI know you would. PM me about it.
But I would love to learn about your unwillingness to go to other subforums.
07 Feb 18
Originally posted by @jacob-vervilleWell, the question you suggested needed a new thread awaits you there. The thread title is based on this statement that you made: "I do not really believe in some society with some extensive network of rights and freedoms, so whatever discrimination means to you would not have similar parallels to me."
I've not hated a thread title so much in my entire life, lol, no.
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @fmfYeah, I know. You said that already (do you remember already saying it?) Maybe your issue is not a reading comprehension problem as much as a short-term memory problem. Do you remember what you had for breakfast today and the last program you watched on the television?
Maybe all these personal deficiencies you have been listing in the last few posts, something which you are doing, it would seem, because we believe different things, also apply to you and your thinking. Maybe it's not just me.
07 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Is this a "substantive" debating point? I don't have "a short-term memory problem". This is just a red herring.
Do you remember what you had for breakfast today and the last program you watched on the television?
- Joined
- 31 Jan 18
- Moves
- 3456
Originally posted by @fmfI’m trying to determine why you constantly repeat yourself and continually ask questions that have already been answered. If you’re not trolling, a short-term memory problem would be a logical reason, which is why I asked.
Is this a "substantive" debating point? I don't have "a short-term memory problem". This is just a red herring.
I note you didn’t answer if you remembered what you had for breakfast and the last show you saw on TV.
Originally posted by @romans1009You seem to think making perhaps serious comments - which then deteriorate into facetious comments - about my personal intellectual and other flaws constitutes "substantive" debate. It does not.
I’m trying to determine why you constantly repeat yourself and continually ask questions that have already been answered. If you’re not trolling, a short-term memory problem would be a logical reason, which is why I asked.
I note you didn’t answer if you remembered what you had for breakfast and the last show you saw on TV.
07 Feb 18
Originally posted by @romans1009Why are you behaving this way?
I note you didn’t answer if you remembered what you had for breakfast and the last show you saw on TV.