Go back
Reds Win the World Series thread

Reds Win the World Series thread

Sports

Vote Up
Vote Down

SC needs to get in the 21st Century and use WAR (Wins Above Replacement) like any decent sabermetrician. Since 2008 the offensive WARs of the three players are:

Votto 21.3
Kemp 20.6
Hamilton 19.9


The stats don't lie; JV is the best.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shortcircuit
Are you thick???

If a guy customarily gets 4 AB's per game and he misses 96 games....he missed out
on nearly 400 AB's.

Even you should be able to figure out that his production during those missed games
would severely have skewed this in Hamilton's favor.
You're not paying attention. so once more.... slowly...


CAREER AT BATS:


Joey Votto.... 2367

Josh Hamilton.... 2420


I know this is going to be tough for you to digest, but 2420 is more than 2367.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shortcircuit
Well, hate to break this to you, but if you ask the experts right now how they rank
the best hitters in baseball it will be Hamilton, Kemp, Votto.

Don't believe, check it out. Hell turn up your volume when they discuss it on ESPN
or the games.
I don't care what the "experts" stuck in 1975 would say.

I have no dog in this fight. I saw the debate and did my own research, de novo.

And the research is clear: Votto is the best offensive player of the three. Next is Hamilton and Kemp lags well behind.

The numbers could not be any clearer.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I already gave this but it's worth mentioning again:

Slash lines with RISP:

Votto: .351/.469/.613
Hamilton .317/.387/.567
Kemp .286/.366/.515

1 edit

Originally posted by sh76
You're not paying attention. so once more.... slowly...


CAREER AT BATS:


Joey Votto.... 2367

Josh Hamilton.... 2420


I know this is going to be tough for you to digest, but 2420 is more than 2367.
Learn math:

Hamilton AB's

2008 624
2009 336
2010 518
2011 486
2012 157

This totals 2122

Now, after you have completed the remedial reading course and you come to grips
with the boundaries we established, then you can argue. Don't try to compare apples and oranges.

Votto AB's

2008 526
2009 469
2010 547
2011 599
2012 138

This totals 2279

No 1 only wanted to consider 2008 to present because all 3 were starters then.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
SC needs to get in the 21st Century and use WAR (Wins Above Replacement) like any decent sabermetrician. Since 2008 the offensive WARs of the three players are:

Votto 21.3
Kemp 20.6
Hamilton 19.9


The stats don't lie; JV is the best.
I do wonder why Kemp is above Hamilton in WAR when the percentage stats favor Hamilton... but that's a side issue.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shortcircuit
Learn math:

Hamilton AB's

2008 624
2009 336
2010 518
2011 486
2012 157

This totals 2122

Votto AB's

2008 526
2009 469
2010 547
2011 599
2012 138

This totals 2279

No 1 only wanted to consider 2008 to present because all 3 were starters then.
That's still pretty close; a different of less than 7% and of course, wouldn't matter in terms of percentage statistics, which are the ones I mainly focus on.

Throw up all the smoke screens in the world; but the percentage numbers are plain as day Votto has Hamilton beaten by 38 points in OBP and the SLG is similar. Add to that the fact that Votto plays in a slightly worse offensive ballpark (again, according to baseballreference) and there's just nothing you can do to change the numbers and their inevitable conclusion.

2 edits

Originally posted by sh76
That's still pretty close; a different of less than 7% and of course, wouldn't matter in terms of percentage statistics, which are the ones I mainly focus on.

Throw up all the smoke screens in the world; but the percentage numbers are plain as day Votto has Hamilton beaten by 38 points in OBP and the SLG is similar. Add to that the fact that Votto plays in a ...[text shortened]... e) and there's just nothing you can do to change the numbers and their inevitable conclusion.
Well, then where does Albert Pujols fit into this argument?

Up until this year, he has been the man. He is also rated the 28th best hitter of all time.

EDIT: FYI, here is where the three players rank on that same list

381 - Josh Hamilton
384 - Matt Kemp
418 - Joey Votto

source : http://www.baseball-reference.com/friv/ratings.cgi

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
I do wonder why Kemp is above Hamilton in WAR when the percentage stats favor Hamilton... but that's a side issue.
A guess would be that Kemp's home park is much less hitter friendly than Hamilton's.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shortcircuit
Well, then where does Albert Pujols fit into this argument?

Up until this year, he has been the man. He is also rated the 28th best hitter of all time.

EDIT: FYI, here is where the three players rank on that same list

381 - Josh Hamilton
384 - Matt Kemp
418 - Joey Votto

source : http://www.baseball-reference.com/friv/ratings.cgi
Pujols dwarfs all of them.

.325/.416/.609

168 OPS+


I don't know how they got the rankings. Maybe Votto is a bad fielder or 1B just get very little credit for fielding score. But in terms of an offensive player, votto is superior to Hamilton and Kemp.


Originally posted by sh76
Pujols dwarfs all of them.

.325/.416/.609

168 OPS+


I don't know how they got the rankings. Maybe Votto is a bad fielder or 1B just get very little credit for fielding score. But in terms of an offensive player, votto is superior to Hamilton and Kemp.
The ratings were based on the full array of offensive stats.
No credit for defense.

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shortcircuit
The ratings were based on the full array of offensive stats.
No credit for defense.
Where do you see a list of what factors go into that rating?


Originally posted by sh76
Where do you see a list of what factors go into that rating?
In the top header of the list, you hit "details".

That gives you the description of the process.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shortcircuit
In the top header of the list, you hit "details".

That gives you the description of the process.
ELO rater is hardly a reliable indicator of anything but lifetime acheivement; by those ratings Chipper Jones is still the third best hitter in baseball.


Originally posted by no1marauder
ELO rater is hardly a reliable indicator of anything but lifetime acheivement; by those ratings Chipper Jones is still the third best hitter in baseball.
I am not surprised that you would dislike something that disagrees with your argument.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.