Originally posted by shavixmirI agree - people in Scotland want independance for lots of different reasons.
"Meet the new boss, same as the old boss"
- The Who -
Whether the Scots are ruled by the English aristocrisy and big business from London or whether they're ruled by the Scottish aristocrisy and big business from Edinburgh, I don't see it's going to make much difference to them.
If I was living in Scotland I would want independance, just so that my political tongue wasn't so stuck up George Bush's rear-end.
I don't think we'll be any better off with Scottish bosses than UK bosses, but it is the start of a process of having no bosses at all.
And, as you say, we'll be a small reduction in the forces of global empire.
Originally posted by RedmikeIf it's not obvious that Scotland wil be better off financially out of the Union, and there's not a huge amount of nationalism to fuel the drive for independence (Alex Salmon is hardly Robert the Bruce), I guess the comfort of the norm and being part of a bigger entity will win through for now with respect to a referendum.
I think the economic arguement is only a part of it.
For what it's worth, my opinion is that, economically, we'll be a bit better off. Not hugely, but a wee bit.
For me, it is an issue of self-determination. If the Scots want to run their own country, and they vote accordingly, whatever the economic consequences, they should be allowed to do so.
E ...[text shortened]... t have the referendum anyway. If we lose, then the issue is dead for decades and the SNP sunk.
Originally posted by ElleEffSeeeJust wait until the FIFA decide that England and Scotland can't have separate football teams...then the drive for independance will succeed.
If it's not obvious that Scotland wil be better off financially out of the Union, and there's not a huge amount of nationalism to fuel the drive for independence (Alex Salmon is hardly Robert the Bruce), I guess the comfort of the norm and being part of a bigger entity will win through for now with respect to a referendum.
Oh yes. Politics and morality can't do the trick, but bloody sport will.
Originally posted by ElleEffSeeeThat's not what the opinion polls are suggesting - there's a consistent majority in favour of outright independance recently.
If it's not obvious that Scotland wil be better off financially out of the Union, and there's not a huge amount of nationalism to fuel the drive for independence (Alex Salmon is hardly Robert the Bruce), I guess the comfort of the norm and being part of a bigger entity will win through for now with respect to a referendum.
Young people, in particular, are very much in favour.
Originally posted by shavixmirgot to admit, i felt for the scots and the welsh having thatcher foisted upon them.
"Meet the new boss, same as the old boss"
- The Who -
Whether the Scots are ruled by the English aristocrisy and big business from London or whether they're ruled by the Scottish aristocrisy and big business from Edinburgh, I don't see it's going to make much difference to them.
If I was living in Scotland I would want independance, just so that my political tongue wasn't so stuck up George Bush's rear-end.
i felt sorry for the english too, but unfortunately we voted her in.
we need PR!
Originally posted by RedmikeHmmm I've had a quick look and that's not the impression I get - it seems half and half to me:
That's not what the opinion polls are suggesting - there's a consistent majority in favour of outright independance recently.
Young people, in particular, are very much in favour.
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060911-011325-7785r
http://www.ipsos-mori.com/polls/2006/spcb.shtml
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/5331992.stm
I wouldn't say the difference between 44 (yay) and 42 (nay) percent is statistically significant (there were only 1176 people in the sample - from the youGov website).
Originally posted by ElleEffSeeeThese are just 2 recent polls (the middle one isn't about independence at all, really).
Hmmm I've had a quick look and that's not the impression I get - it seems half and half to me:
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.php?StoryID=20060911-011325-7785r
http://www.ipsos-mori.com/polls/2006/spcb.shtml
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/5331992.stm
I wouldn't say the difference between 44 (yay) and 42 (nay) percent is statistically significant (there were only 1176 people in the sample - from the youGov website).
They are both in favour, as have just about all the others in recent years.
The 2% difference isn't statistically significant in a single poll, but when most of the polls have the same general trend, then that is significant.
Originally posted by Vargah sure it serves you right!
And now the English are ruled by the Scottish mafia.
What irony!
and you only realised when it was too late! Even Tony Blair's a Scot. Not to mention Kirsty Wark, and Gavin Esler...
and Brown is 'too Scottish', but bulldog Clarke is apparently not too Scottish... which is odd, as he seems a tone up from Brown...
Originally posted by aging blitzerApparently he has a genuine PhD in Economic History.
I thought John Reid was the attack dog.
Or Dr. John Reid as he seems to be called sometimes.
What's he an honourary ( I assume) doctor of?
Edit: Ignore 'apparently'; I have now found a reliable source for that.