24 Mar 22
@mott-the-hoople saidHahaha I wish this forum had a zoom option and I could see you blush on that post.
This has nothing to do with her race. You are no one to be speaking of racism. You are one of the worst racist I have ever seen.
@kevcvs57 saidUhhhh, does Suzianne not interject race into every thread, every issue, every post? Big a big guy,, say, yes, you have a point.
Hahaha I wish this forum had a zoom option and I could see you blush on that post.
Geez O Petey.
Seems Biden was on to race by announcing in advance that the first requirement ( ignoring having a feel for the constitution) was that his choice would be a black person. What is wrong with these people.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
24 Mar 22
@averagejoe1 saidUs people?
What is the end game for you people? Jesus.
You got some brass.
''......never in y 48 tears in this chamber,
have I seen a nominee treated so disrespectfully as I have today......''
.................Senator Patrick Leahy
24 Mar 22
@no1marauder saidI'd have settled for "an adult human female", but as least she seems to acknowledge it should have something to do with biology.
I suppose any answer but "A device for carrying babies" wouldn't have satisfied right wingers.
24 Mar 22
@jimm619 saidOh, im sure that under the present atmoshere of the transformation of America, spearheaded and still controlled by Obama, promulgated by y’all, that you will forgive me wearing my emotions on my sleeve.
Us people?
You got some brass.
''......never in y 48 tears in this chamber,
have I seen a nominee treated so disrespectfully as I have today......''
.................Senator Patrick Leahy
24 Mar 22
@sleepyguy saidThere's clearly a dispute about this in our society, illustrated clearly in new bathroom laws and transgender athletes in sports that might make it to SCOTUS.
I'd have settled for "an adult human female", but as least she seems to acknowledge it should have something to do with biology.
Instead of defining it prior to hearing oral arguments, she deferred to biology. I don't understand what conservatives don't like about her answer.
@wildgrass saidOne thing is that the other 8 justices will have to spar with her throughout her tenure as she laces her comments with opinions that are, shall we say, concepts with which they are not familiar. Outside the realm of her duties as a judge.....guardian and interpreter of the constitution . That is it. But it won't be IT for her. Do you agree? Do you think she will stay between the rails? I don't.
There's clearly a dispute about this in our society, illustrated clearly in new bathroom laws and transgender athletes in sports that might make it to SCOTUS.
Instead of defining it prior to hearing oral arguments, she deferred to biology. I don't understand what conservatives don't like about her answer.
They will take a lunch break during discussions, go to the cafeteria, and say...'what in the hell!!!??"
24 Mar 22
@averagejoe1 saidTo be fair Joe, the word 'woman' is nowhere to be found in the Constitution, so it's outside the realm of her duties as a judge to define it.
One thing is that the other 8 justices will have to spar with her throughout her tenure as she laces her comments with opinions that are, shall we say, concepts with which they are not familiar. Outside the realm of her duties as a judge.....guardian and interpreter of the constitution . That is it. But it won't be IT for her. Do you agree? Do you think she will stay ...[text shortened]... y will take a lunch break during discussions, go to the cafeteria, and say...'what in the hell!!!??"
24 Mar 22
@averagejoe1 saidShe may find like minded souls in Kagan and the wide Latina.
One thing is that the other 8 justices will have to spar with her throughout her tenure as she laces her comments with opinions that are, shall we say, concepts with which they are not familiar. Outside the realm of her duties as a judge.....guardian and interpreter of the constitution . That is it. But it won't be IT for her. Do you agree? Do you think she will stay ...[text shortened]... y will take a lunch break during discussions, go to the cafeteria, and say...'what in the hell!!!??"
24 Mar 22
@wildgrass saidNot a bad point, there should be no mention of race, sex, disability, marriage status on any goobermint literature, before the state and before the law all should be equal.
To be fair Joe, the word 'woman' is nowhere to be found in the Constitution, so it's outside the realm of her duties as a judge to define it.
24 Mar 22
@jimm619 saidReally...?
Us people?
You got some brass.
''......never in y 48 tears in this chamber,
have I seen a nominee treated so disrespectfully as I have today......''
.................Senator Patrick Leahy
Democrats,, remember what you did to Kavanaugh in front of his family? Payback's a bytch, eh?
@wajoma saidRight well just because it's not mentioned doesn't mean it's not to be legislated. That'd be silly.
Not a bad point, there should be no mention of race, sex, disability, marriage status on any goobermint literature, before the state and before the law all should be equal.
It was irrelevant for a SCOTUS nomination hearing though.