Go back
To climate control activists.....

To climate control activists.....

Debates

Clock

@wildgrass said
Oof... Facepalm. Leave my climate alone, eco-fascist.
Plants are growing better.
A warmer climate means more rainfall. That means more food.
Stop trying to ruin a good thing!

Clock
1 edit

@metal-brain said
Plants are growing better.
A warmer climate means more rainfall. That means more food.
Stop trying to ruin a good thing!
I've never come closer to cursing at you through my computer screen. You are the worst type of human.

Clock

@wildgrass
He is a freak of nature, something that grew out of a slime mold project of a demented ten yo.

Clock

@wildgrass said
I've never come closer to cursing at you through my computer screen. You are the worst type of human.
Plants like CO2, more CO2 healthier faster growing plants. Undisputed
Plants thrive in warmer climates, Travel the world, get some life experience, compare tropical climates to cold. Undisputed.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

@wajoma said
Plants like CO2, more CO2 healthier faster growing plants. Undisputed
Plants thrive in warmer climates, Travel the world, get some life experience, compare tropical climates to cold. Undisputed.
Plants, yeahsure.

People, not so much.

Clock

@metal-brain said
@sonhouse

You are such a moron.
ExxonMobil Corporation is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil.

In their Sustainable Development Program Review, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund boasts of being one of the first major global warming activists, citing ...[text shortened]...
I know you don't want to believe it, but it is true.
Big oil started the global warming movement.
You are arguably the biggest fool on the planet.

Clock

@wajoma said
Plants like CO2, more CO2 healthier faster growing plants. Undisputed
Plants thrive in warmer climates, Travel the world, get some life experience, compare tropical climates to cold. Undisputed.
Some plants do. Some plants don’t.
Take Germany. It’s so dry the last few years, that bark beetles are destroying whole pine forests (pine trees needing temperate and regular wet climates).

Now… who lives in these pine forests? Deer, boar, bats, woodpeckers… a lot of animals being displaced and disappearing. Along with birds, insects and the complete bio diversity.

Please think before opening your stupid gob and spewing forth utter rubbish you know nothing about.

Clock

@metal-brain said
The industrial revolution took place after the end of the little ice age. GW predated the industrial revolution when CO2 levels were low.

The ice core samples prove CO2 lagged behind temperatures. You had your cause and effect backwards because you believed Al Gore's lies.
We’ve just had the 10 hottest years since records began nothing to do with sun spots, flares, or activity nothing to do with the attitude of the planet, everything to do with increasing global Co2 emissions and human activity.
Stop lying and stop being stupid. I know your boss his nest egg and plans for European domination tied up with the price and availability of fossil fuels but he’s just going to find a way that doesn’t involve frying us alive and poisoning the air.

Clock

@suzianne said
Plants, yeahsure.

People, not so much.
That's funny because year upon year less people die from climate related events. Guess they didn't hear about the doom and gloom from you guys yet.

Clock

@wildgrass said
I've never come closer to cursing at you through my computer screen. You are the worst type of human.
Calm down. I am bringing you good news.

The Pliocene Epoch had the same CO2 levels as now, yet the Pliocene was so warm there were no glaciers at all. They all melted. Life thrived in that warm climate. It was not at all a complete disaster like chick little has been saying.

Don't expect it to get as warm as it was in the Pliocene though. We have the same CO2 levels and we have plenty of glaciers, especially on Antarctica. CO2 is clearly not the bogey man we have been taught it was. It doesn't drive temperature at these puny levels and it is not surprising at all. The correlation between the 2 exists, but all the ice core samples proved is that temperatures drive CO2 levels in the atmosphere higher, not the other way around.

When we burned fossil fuels enough to increase CO2 in the atmosphere we broke that correlation. It didn't result in Pliocene like temperatures, not even close.
This is great news! Why do you want to kill the messenger when the news is so good?

Clock

@kevcvs57 said
We’ve just had the 10 hottest years since records began nothing to do with sun spots, flares, or activity nothing to do with the attitude of the planet, everything to do with increasing global Co2 emissions and human activity.
Stop lying and stop being stupid. I know your boss his nest egg and plans for European domination tied up with the price and availability of fossil fuels but he’s just going to find a way that doesn’t involve frying us alive and poisoning the air.
That is not surprising. The earth has been warming for centuries. I would expect hotter temp records. That does NOT prove increasing global Co2 emissions by man caused it.

You made that leap of faith again. There is no evidence man is the main cause of global warming. The earth was warming before the industrial revolution. Man most certainly did NOT start the global warming trend and there is no evidence man made the trend much worse.

Sea level rise has been slow and steady and that rate has not accelerated much at all

Clock

@shavixmir said
Some plants do. Some plants don’t.
Take Germany. It’s so dry the last few years, that bark beetles are destroying whole pine forests (pine trees needing temperate and regular wet climates).

Now… who lives in these pine forests? Deer, boar, bats, woodpeckers… a lot of animals being displaced and disappearing. Along with birds, insects and the complete bio diversity.

Please think before opening your stupid gob and spewing forth utter rubbish you know nothing about.
Stop it you're scaring everyone haw haw.

"Climate change over the next 20 years could result in a global catastrophe costing millions of lives in wars and natural disasters."
The Guardian, 2004

Clock
1 edit

@wajoma said
Stop it you're scaring everyone haw haw.

"Climate change over the next 20 years could result in a global catastrophe costing millions of lives in wars and natural disasters."
The Guardian, 2004
So now we need war to fight climate change. Only problem is that war is what causes climate change.

https://rumble.com/v1dvzk1-wh-spokesman-salivates-about-fighting-wars-over-climate-change.html

The propaganda is becoming super stupid. It is laughable that people believe this crap. And now we know why they stopped calling it global warming and are now calling it climate change. We are getting record low temps too, but no need to inform chicken little about that.

https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/antarctic-records-low-temperatures-never-seen-before/1028237

Clock

@metal-brain said
Plants are growing better.
A warmer climate means more rainfall. That means more food.
Stop trying to ruin a good thing!
Idiot an overheated planet means a lot less rainfall and thus a lot less plant life and consequently a lot less rainfall. Can you see where this is going Ivan.

Clock

@metal-brain said
So now we need war to fight climate change. Only problem is that war is what causes climate change.

https://rumble.com/v1dvzk1-wh-spokesman-salivates-about-fighting-wars-over-climate-change.html

The propaganda is becoming super stupid. It is laughable that people believe this crap. And now we know why they stopped calling it global warming and are now calling it cl ...[text shortened]... s://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/antarctic-records-low-temperatures-never-seen-before/1028237
Oooh www.acuweather.com
😂😂
Clown land rears it’s ugly head again

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.