- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
12 Jun 22
@suzianne saidSure it's misogyny. She's a woman, she can't possibly be held accountable for her own actions, the poor, little victim.
The rank misogyny on display here rankles, especially when it is accompanied by giving Charles a pass.
It astounds me, and always will keep astounding me, how you so-called, self-styled "feminists" keep infantilising women by insisting that whatever they do, they must be and always will be the victims. Diana went in, not only knowing full well what she went into, but with a battle plan. If there was a victim in that relationship at all, she was not it.
As for giving Charles a pass, I can only presume that when your feminist claxons went off, they were so blinding you weren't able to read the rest of that post. The only alternative is that you are a complete, sexist hypocrite.
12 Jun 22
@shallow-blue saidThumb up.
Sure it's misogyny. She's a woman, she can't possibly be held accountable for her own actions, the poor, little victim.
It astounds me, and always will keep astounding me, how you so-called, self-styled "feminists" keep infantilising women by insisting that whatever they do, they must be and always will be the victims. Diana went in, not only knowing full well what sh ...[text shortened]... le to read the rest of that post. The only alternative is that you are a complete, sexist hypocrite.
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
12 Jun 22
@divegeester saidThere's no need to publicise that. My ego is not that fragile, and neither should yours be.
Thumb up.