07 Mar 12
Originally posted by greenpawn34Steve Giddins image? On his blog he credits where his pictures come from... perhaps you should be doing the same?
I'm not hounding you RJ.
It must be awful watching all your games appearing the forum.
And you do sometimes put your foot in your mouth.
I've been half expecting you to say:
"Wait a minute, I did not use an engine on that one!" 😉
Try to understand most (all) of the lads posting against you have
been the victim of a loss v a banned player. ...[text shortened]... 5
So you have your cross to bear 🙂 and I have mine.
Anybody know a good lawyer?
Originally posted by greenpawn34I can't hardly remember what I learned 30 years ago because that was when I
I'm not hounding you RJ.
It must be awful watching all your games appearing the forum.
And you do sometimes put your foot in your mouth.
I've been half expecting you to say:
"Wait a minute, I did not use an engine on that one!" 😉
Try to understand most (all) of the lads posting against you have
been the victim of a loss v a banned player. 5
So you have your cross to bear 🙂 and I have mine.
Anybody know a good lawyer?
quit playing chess. I only started playing again here a year ago. I was not
familiar with that position and was just trying to see another possiblity for
Black's blunder and contribute something to the conversation. I did not do
any analyzing; it was just my first instinct. Of course at first look it would
appear to be a loss in tempo. But my thought at the the time, not knowing
that variation, was that the Bishop move may have been one of those moves
to provoke a weakness around the King first and then returning to the square
he intended to move in the first place. So when I said "MAYBE" it did not
lose a tempo, I was thinking that White may not have wanted to move f3 and
maybe would want to move to f4 later, which he could have done in one move
had he not already moved to f3. I still have not made an attempt to really
analyze what may have happened later in the game for I don't really care.
I don't play the Dragon as Black anyway. I only take lectures from masters
and you are not one.
07 Mar 12
Originally posted by RJHindsI thought you were leaving?
I can't hardly remember what I learned 30 years ago because that was when I
quit playing chess. I only started playing again here a year ago. I was not
familiar with that position and was just trying to see another possiblity for
Black's blunder and contribute something to the conversation. I did not do
any analyzing; it was just my first instinct. O ...[text shortened]... play the Dragon as Black anyway. I only take lectures from masters
and you are not one.
Originally posted by Proper KnobI am waiting for the Judge's decision. If he says I should leave, I will leave.
I thought you were leaving?
There are several other on-line chess sites I could go. But I may not want
to anyway since I have started back playing OTB. But the Spiritually forum
may miss my insight on spiritual matters, so that is the only reason I haven't
left already.
Originally posted by RJHindsThe decision is your and yours alone Ron. After the lack of respect you have shown for your fellow chess players one might have hoped you'd have the common decency to just go quietly. Alas, it seems you're vanity and ego is hanging on for more attention. I can assure you, you won't be missed in the spirituality forum, even your fellow Christians think you're a disgrace.
I am waiting for the Judge's decision. If he says I should leave, I will leave.
There are several other on-line chess sites I could go. But I may not want
to anyway since I have started back playing OTB. But the Spiritually forum
may miss my insight on spiritual matters, so that is the only reason I haven't
left already.
07 Mar 12
Originally posted by RJHindsZygalski is not the judge he is the lawyer. Apparently the Judge has fallen asleep in his chambers. In any case he has been quite lenient of late allowing a string of offenders to walk when incarceration would have been a more appropriate option. Only the weight of public opinion and a front page headline in the Daily Mail can make him come to his senses.
I am waiting for the Judge's decision. If he says I should leave, I will leave.
There are several other on-line chess sites I could go. But I may not want
to anyway since I have started back playing OTB. But the Spiritually forum
may miss my insight on spiritual matters, so that is the only reason I haven't
left already.
07 Mar 12
2 edits
Originally posted by RJHindsLOL, RJH, we keep you around in spirituality, just for kicks! not as a Guru, especially
I am waiting for the Judge's decision. If he says I should leave, I will leave.
There are several other on-line chess sites I could go. But I may not want
to anyway since I have started back playing OTB. But the Spiritually forum
may miss my insight on spiritual matters, so that is the only reason I haven't
left already.
since you cannot tell the difference between a predicate noun and the subject of a
sentence.
07 Mar 12
Originally posted by gambit05Sorry, I was directing my Master comment at the guy who only listens to masters... I was agreeing with you it was a very stupid thing to say.
The onle way I cannot answer "I don't get it" is that you are implying that I am chaeting. If so, show me the evidence.
Sorry, nothing implied at you.
P-
- Joined
- 18 Jan 07
- Moves
- 12477
07 Mar 12
Originally posted by Proper KnobNo, Mr. Knob, you've got that last one wrong.
The decision is your and yours alone Ron. After the lack of respect you have shown for your fellow chess players one might have hoped you'd have the common decency to just go quietly. Alas, it seems you're vanity and ego is hanging on for more attention. I can assure you, you won't be missed in the spirituality forum, even your fellow Christians think you're a disgrace.
Especially Christians think he's a disgrace. Non-Christians think he may be misrepresenting the Bible; we know he is.
Richard