18 Mar 12
Originally posted by ErekoseI'm sure your spot on with everything you said Mr. Erekose. I don't know much about it. But I will add that maybe the system you had described (I think you called it blunderchecking?) seems like it might be worth a look-see on this stuff.
Its worth remembering that a couple of games is not significant - that's why Zygalski does 20 games. There are plenty of GM games that have 90+% matchup (top three choices). Heck, one of my old OTB games from the 1980's was over 90% when I analyzed it. Its consistently being over 90% that's suspicious.
Q