08 Jul 08
1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauderSuch as you for example.
Again, YOU might not be certain about Blobby, but I am.
No, as usual you are wrong; very few, IF ANY, of the 3(b)s were banned for getting assistance besides engine assistance. Some were banned for playing games against fake accounts they had set up, but I'd say that made up a tiny minority of 3(b)s. Again we have people pontificating about subjects when they are woefully ignorant (perhaps deliberately so) of the facts.
Again you misquote me, probably deliberately. I said "Many of the 3(b) players have been banned for getting assistance other than engine assistance". I don't know how many and cannot prove it one way or the other but neither can you.
However I am certainly not trying to claim other than many were banned for engine use also.
08 Jul 08
Originally posted by KorchHe might have unmasked many engine users but his attitude is arrogant and he displays woeful ignorance in many areas.
Dont know about that particular case, but he have unmasked many engine users of this site. Which does not mean that he can`t make mistakes of course.
Whereas I am prepared to err on the side of caution and give people the benefit of the doubt he assumes everyone is guilty until proven innocent.
There is no sin in erring on the side of caution.
Such attitudes are beginning to get me really p£$%&@ off so maybe after 3 years of subscribing it is time to cut down my games and depart to a site with less confrontation.
08 Jul 08
1 edit
Originally posted by Dragon FireAgain, YOU don't know but I do. I have closely followed the work of the Game Mods since their inception and I know, FOR A FACT, that my statement regarding the paucity of players being banned for receiving assistance other than engine assistance is true. Your claim that "many" have is false and your suggestion that perhaps "most" have is ridiculous.
Such as you for example.
Again you misquote me, probably deliberately. I said "Many of the 3(b) players have been banned for getting assistance other than engine assistance". I don't know how many and cannot prove it one way or the other but neither can you.
However I am certainly not trying to claim other than [b]many were banned for engine use also.[/b]
i.e. DF: Many of the 3(b) players have been banned for getting assistance other than engine assistance, maybe even most
08 Jul 08
1 edit
Originally posted by Dragon FireSee ya.
He might have unmasked many engine users but his attitude is arrogant and he displays woeful ignorance in many areas.
Whereas I am prepared to err on the side of caution and give people the benefit of the doubt he assumes everyone is guilty until proven innocent.
There is no sin in erring on the side of caution.
Such attitudes are beginning to g ...[text shortened]... ars of subscribing it is time to cut down my games and depart to a site with less confrontation.
I give players the benefit of the doubt, but at some point when the engine match ups are extremely high, when they are making hundreds of moves daily without any consequential errors, when an 1100 or 1000 rating jumps 500-600 points in a month or so, etc. etc. etc. etc. doubt is inappropriate. Humans unaided by engines cannot do these things.
08 Jul 08
Originally posted by no1marauderNo you are just an arrogant tosser who is really beginning to piss me off!
Again, YOU don't know but I do. I have closely followed the work of the Game Mods since their inception and I know, FOR A FACT, that my statement regarding the paucity of players being banned for receiving assistance other than engine assistance is true. Your claim that "many" have is false and your suggestion that perhaps "most" have is ridiculous.
08 Jul 08
1 edit
Originally posted by no1marauderYeah yours! and no doubt Russ will be happy that you are driving subscribers away but I assume you don't care because, other than you, we are all cheaters!
Tough titty. Stop making factually incorrect statements and I won't have to bother to correct your errors. Then maybe you won't react in such a childish manner.
My statements are no more factually incorrect than yours and are usually prefaced with "maybe", "in my opinion", "possibly" or some other word that indicates clearly that I don't have definitive proof, unlike you who has proof of everything.
08 Jul 08
Originally posted by KorchExactly, we report, the game mods do the unmasking. Or are you saying that many alleged engine users were banned simply on no1marauder's say so? If so, no wonder I have felt so uneasy about some bannings.
You should not be a game mod to report possible cheaters and present evidence to RHP admins/game mods.
08 Jul 08
3 edits
Originally posted by KeplerI want to say that many engine users have been banned because no1marauder have reported about them. Don`t nitpick to single words.
Exactly, we report, the game mods do the unmasking. Or are you saying that many alleged engine users were banned simply on no1marauder's say so? If so, no wonder I have felt so uneasy about some bannings.
P.S. And he have detected many engine users before mod system was created.
P.P.S. I can understand that you can disagree with him in particular case, but denying his merits is obviously inobjective.
08 Jul 08
Originally posted by Keplerno1marauder knows everything.
Exactly, we report, the game mods do the unmasking. Or are you saying that many alleged engine users were banned simply on no1marauder's say so? If so, no wonder I have felt so uneasy about some bannings.
He is the font of all knowledge from which the rest of us should drink.
Thank god he wasn't elected as a game mod as we would have no one left as the site is infested with 1300 players using Rybka on its strongest setting.