The post that was quoted here has been removedIf we throw Occam's Razor out the window, it is possible that the virus was loaded onto a comet in outerspace, exploded over China in October, picked up by secret lab scientists and studied in the lab, covered up by Chinese officials, discovered by Deep State officials as a means for undermining US elections, disseminated around the world by globalists, creating a crisis which was harnessed for financial gain by Jeff Bezos who will eventually cut a check to the alien comet-hurling Antifa protestor. It's a good thing Pompeo found out the evidence but won't tell anyone what the evidence is.
Or, this could just be an epidemic similar to the hundreds of similar ones that have happened throughout recorded human history dating back to 1200 BC. 8 percent of the human genome is viral in origin. But... conspiracy... because we have nothing better to do.
If the moon comes up this evening and Pompeo says it was created in a lab, there's a segment of society that'd believe him.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/04/science/ancient-viruses-dna-genome.html
@Duchess64
OH NO, tell me it isn't true. Pompeo lying TOO? Who would have known, they did 3 months ago😉
08 May 20
@sonhouse saidThat makes no sense at all. I think you accepted something that makes no sense because you want to believe it.
@Metal-Brain
Maybe it just because he is as much of a flipper as Trump. We are winding down the task force, Next day, OH I didn't know the task force was so POPULAR, so it's back on.
Just like a hundred other flips of our UN POTUS.
For one thing, the experts I listened to who actually knows about genetic engineering said to get a virus as virulent as C19 in a lab is nea ...[text shortened]... people would never believe an expert like THAT since you OBVIOUSLY know ten times more than they do.
@metal-brain saidDid you read this?
https://www.eutimes.net/2020/02/study-coronavirus-is-a-bioweapon-with-gain-of-function-property-for-efficient-spreading/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220300528
@wildgrass saidThe EU Times is mad, it's got a bunch of adverts on sex positions and a computer game where "you can't last 5 minutes!" - and I'm sure that's not because of my browsing habits - the title implies pro-Europe but it reads like a cross between an alt-right publication and paranoia news.
Did you read this?
@humy saidThe fact that they have to explain Total Deaths vs Total Deaths per Capita only after UK overtook Italy is the problem. He also wouldn't say "what the better measure between the two definitively is" - You have to be kidding! Of course the per capita is the proper figure of the two. Its not a g dam debate! US went from #1 Worst to #1 Best on the infographic for that grouping of countries! Total Deaths un corrected for population is patently not how its done. Its always presented on a per capita basis in the sciences. Suddenly, they want the numbers to look huge to the everyday person that has no idea of how man people die every day and not a word is said. Every news report from here on out should start out in the US as 8000 people died today!
This video explains some of the reasons why the official C19 death toll is often misleading;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNiAUPREkl8
@deepthought saidYour attack the source method has failed. That article is based on this peer reviewed article from a respected science journal.
The EU Times is mad, it's got a bunch of adverts on sex positions and a computer game where "you can't last 5 minutes!" - and I'm sure that's not because of my browsing habits - the title implies pro-Europe but it reads like a cross between an alt-right publication and paranoia news.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220300528
09 May 20
@metal-brain saidI didn't comment on either the paper, I haven't read it yet, or on whatever the point that you were making. My comment is simply that the EU Times is completely mad.
Your attack the source method has failed. That article is based on this peer reviewed article from a respected science journal.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220300528
@deepthought saidThen forget the EU Times. What about this?
I didn't comment on either the paper, I haven't read it yet, or on whatever the point that you were making. My comment is simply that the EU Times is completely mad.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220300528
@metal-brain saidDid you read this?
Then forget the EU Times. What about this?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220300528