Spirituality
10 Apr 23
@kellyjay saidIt is you who is acting like an ostrich with its head in the sand: you have been studiously ignoring about 90% of what's been said in this conversation, even though you chose the topic and you started the thread.
You ignore those questions as if they don't matter, but they are like a huge amount of other things you cannot explain, you are okay with that as if the origin has nothing to do with the present or the future.
If you think moonbus has been "ignoring" questions, perhaps it is because you are behaving like a manchild whose curiosity about other people's views on this topic is not genuine.
18 Apr 23
@fmf saidBig baby.
It is you who is acting like an ostrich with its head in the sand: you have been studiously ignoring about 90% of what's been said in this conversation, even though you chose the topic and you started the thread.
If you think moonbus has been "ignoring" questions, perhaps it is because you are behaving like a manchild whose curiosity about other people's views on this topic is not genuine.
20 Apr 23
@kellyjay saidYour "good description" of "evil" is misanthropic [to suit your own ideological needs] and self-defeatingly diluted and therefore meaningless.
Read a good description of evil today, good misappropriated or misused.
Here is a "good description" of "evil". It is an adjective describing an egregious, gratuitous, sociopathic action that is gravely detrimental /damaging to others, and which stems from an abject lack or even absence of empathy and compassion.
@fmf saidSuzianne: agrees with this
Here is a "good description" of "evil". It is an adjective describing an egregious, gratuitous, sociopathic action that is gravely detrimental /damaging to others, and which stems from an abject lack or even absence of empathy and compassion.
divesgeester: agrees with this and has discussed it
moonbus: agrees with this and has discussed it
medullah: has agreed with this in the past
FMF: I clearly think it's a sound definition and a good starting point for a genuine discussion
KellyJay: presumably doesn't agree with it but steadfastly refuses to discuss it or even acknowledge that it is part of this discussion and therefore makes himself look furtive and disingenuous