Go back
Permanent Members of Christ's Royal Family

Permanent Members of Christ's Royal Family

Spirituality

Grampy Bobby
Boston Lad

USA

Joined
14 Jul 07
Moves
43012
Clock
25 May 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
Is this obsession of yours meant to embarrass Grampy Bobby until he publically confesses his sin and repents by admitting that YOU are NOT a permanent member of Christ's Royal Family?
Thread 159413

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
25 May 14
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
Think of it like this, person A claims to have lived in Chicago years ago.
Then person A realized it was not Chicago but New York he lived in.
So now person A goes around saying I lived in New York my whole life,
but once I lived in Chicago even though I reject Chicago now.
This is about as facile and off-target an analogy as one could dream up about the reality of faith and belief in one's life. It shows me you just do not get what we have been talking about. Your beliefs have deprived you of an understanding of the human condition. You say that you know that people's beliefs can change, and yet you demonstrate no understanding of what it means for a person's beliefs to change.

Here's your dud analogy, fixed, and sent back to you:

Person A lived in Chicago years ago. Then person A moved to New York. So now person A goes around saying ~ accurately ~ I lived in Chicago before but now I live in New York.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
25 May 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Thread 159413
Still dodging the point blank question I asked on page 5, I see. I bumped it on page 7 too. Your link to another thread does not answer it. It is evasion.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
25 May 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
As to what will happen to the unbeliever, like you, the following makes it clear:

Revelation 21:8

New King James Version (NKJV)

But the cowardly, [b]unbelieving,
abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers, idolaters, and all liars shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone, which is the second death.”[/b]
You should address this to the Christians who have told me that I am saved because I used to believe in Christ "in a moment of time" in the past. Remember, I don't see your assertions as being any more or less credible than theirs. The issue here is the difference between your theology and theirs.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
25 May 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
You can claim to be Christain, but God is required for that not just your
mouthing the words. So denying that means there was never really a
time you could have been a Christain, by your current mind set, if God
is required you missed out on God during the whole time you were
making the claim of being a Christain. Which is a very huge shame since
God is the best part of being a Christain.
Kelly
I do not claim to be a Christian. I used to be one but now I am not one any more. It is not possible for you to erase my Christian faith in the past by simply asserting and asserting and asserting and asserting that my change in beliefs somehow makes my post-change beliefs the same as my pre-change beliefs.

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
25 May 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Thread 159413
"Church of Atheism" Rising! Mass Christians Renouncing Faith!

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
25 May 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
You can claim to be Christain, but God is required for that not just your
mouthing the words.
This is not a genuine debating point, Kelly. Anyone could just insist that YOUR Christian faith is "just your mouthing the words" and then simply say it [or similar dismissive remarks] over and over and over again without listening to anything you say. Even though I do not really know you, I take you at your word when you say you are a Christian.

The fact that you cannot, even as a matter of common decency, return the favour regarding my faith in the past ~ and instead just project all manner of accusations - "lying" - "fakery" - "mouthing the words" - onto my testimony here [someone you don't really know, and certainly did not know me back when I was a Christian], makes me think that your whole thrust here is you simply beating your own personal drum ~ trying to demonstrate how pious you are ~ rather than about me.

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
160688
Clock
25 May 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
This is not a genuine debating point, Kelly. Anyone could just insist that YOUR Christian faith is "just your mouthing the words" and then simply say it [or similar dismissive remarks] over and over and over again without listening to anything you say. Even though I do not really know you, I take you at your word when you say you are a Christian.

The fact t ...[text shortened]... beating your own personal drum ~ trying to demonstrate how pious you are ~ rather than about me.
Your claims now about what you professed to be true is what I am
pointing out to you. You deny what you once said was true now, I'm not
doing that you are!

Since you deny what you what you once said was true, we can then
just accept your current word, and reach the belief that what you had
was not real, it was false, it did not have God in it.

It isn't that you didn't make the claim, I agree with you that you did,
but what you are now shows what you had then wasn't real.
Kelly

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
25 May 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Jesus speaking of the end of the age says ...

At that time many will fall away and will betray one another and hate one another. Many false prophets will arise and will mislead many.

(Matthew 24:10-11 NASB)

And the apostle Paul says ...

But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons,

(1 Timothy 4:1 NASB)

KellyJay
Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
160688
Clock
25 May 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
This is about as facile and off-target an analogy as one could dream up about the reality of faith and belief in one's life. It shows me you just do not get what we have been talking about. Your beliefs have deprived you of an understanding of the human condition. You say that you know that people's beliefs can change, and yet you demonstrate no understanding of ...[text shortened]... person A goes around saying ~ accurately ~ I lived in Chicago before but now I live in New York.
Not fixed, since you deny now the truth that is in Christianity you do not
get to say it was real and now it is not. You may say I claimed to be
one, then discovered it wasn't real, and now I'm this.
Kelly

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
25 May 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
Not fixed, since you deny now the truth that is in Christianity you do not
get to say it was real and now it is not. You may say I claimed to be
one, then discovered it wasn't real, and now I'm this.
Kelly
Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Therefore by their fruits you will know them.

(Matthew 7:19-20 NKJV)

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
25 May 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
Your claims now about what you professed to be true is what I am
pointing out to you. You deny what you once said was true now, I'm not
doing that you are!
What I believed back then, I believed to be true. What I believe now does not alter what I believed to be true in the past. What has changed is my belief.

This means I do not believe the same thing now as I did in the past. What I believe now does not change what I believed in the past. What changed was my perception of what I believed in the past, not the actual things I believed back then.

You say that you accept that people's beliefs can change, but you exhibit no understanding at all of what this actually entails.

My change in beliefs did not get back-dated and they did not somehow somehow replace my beliefs as they were at the time when I was a Christian.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
25 May 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
Not fixed, since you deny now the truth that is in Christianity you do not
get to say it was real and now it is not. You may say I claimed to be
one, then discovered it wasn't real, and now I'm this.
I was a Christian. It was real to me. But I lost my faith. You are a Christian. And you have not yet lost your faith. So you are still a Christian and I am no longer one.

Does this work for you: Person A was a Christian years ago. Then person A's beliefs changed and he became an ex-Christian. So now person A goes around saying ~ accurately ~ I used to be a Christian before but now I am no longer one.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
Clock
25 May 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KellyJay
Since you deny what you what you once said was true, we can then
just accept your current word, and reach the belief that what you had
was not real, it was false, it did not have God in it.
It did have [the Christian] God in it, though. I take you at your word when you say you have God in your life. I am not denying that I once held Christian beliefs that I believed to be true.

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
25 May 14
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
This is not a genuine debating point, Kelly. Anyone could just insist that YOUR Christian faith is "just your mouthing the words" and then simply say it [or similar dismissive remarks] over and over and over again without listening to anything you say. Even though I do not really know you, I take you at your word when you say you are a Christian.

The fact t ...[text shortened]... beating your own personal drum ~ trying to demonstrate how pious you are ~ rather than about me.
I don't think he does it to sound pious. I think he does it because he cannot deal with the concept of someone walking away from beliefs like his own. Basically, he just defines all of us 'former Christians' out of existence.

The thought process goes:
1) Christianity is necessarily about a relationship with God.
2) A relationship with God is so fulfilling that no one would ever abandon the relationship for any reason.
3) FMF, by his own admission, is not a Christian right now.
C) Therefore, it follows from 1) and 2) that FMF was never a Christian.

I would reject 1) for sure, and I could make a case for rejecting 2) as well [the Bible has several accounts of strained relationships with God, revealing it to be somewhat less than awesome for certain people; also, human beings are not always consistent. We may find fulfillment for a time, but grow disillusioned later.]

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.