Originally posted by ivanhoeYou continue to be irrational and emotional and have now added the inclusion of your personal vendetta into the discussion.
I am being irrational and emotional (??) because I am "concentrating on what happened prior to claim that the decision by the jumpers was not suicide." ?
[b]marauder: "As pointed out above. the jumpers had a choice at the ledge to end their lives immediately or to leave it in God's hands."
Only in an inhumane and very legalistic reductionist ...[text shortened]... o were not suicides."[/b]
The only ones who committed suicide were the terrorists, marauder.[/b]
I have not accused anybody of anything; since I personally don't find suicide morally objectionable in any way, saying someone committed suicide is not an "accusation" to me. But suicide is a word with a definite common meaning and I don't try to distort its meaning beyond all recognization to make an emotional point. The jumpers here committed suicide by any standard definition.
Originally posted by no1marauderAre you withdrawing now, marauder ?
The question is addressed to people who believe things like this:
Darfius: Committing suicide is a one way ticket to hell. It shows a complete and utter lack of belief that God can help you through anything. In other words, even if he had faith, he lost it at that last moment.
AND
Darfius: I'm simply pointing out that suicide gets you ...[text shortened]... vant to someone who doesn't believe in the concept of "eternal damnation" or "Hell" at all.
Originally posted by HalitoseEmotionalism again with the addition of presumptions about the actual circumstances ("flames licking at your face"😉 that do not comport with the actual reality. There was footage in the program and it did not reflect what you are describing.
How premeditated do you think it is when you have flames licking at you face and your every reflex is urging you off that ledge?
Originally posted by no1marauderThe jumpers here committed suicide by any standard definition.
You continue to be irrational and emotional and have now added the inclusion of your personal vendetta into the discussion.
I have not accused anybody of anything; since I personally don't find suicide morally objectionable in any way, saying someone committed suicide is not an "accusation" to me. But suicide is a word with a definite common ...[text shortened]... ation to make an emotional point. The jumpers here committed suicide by any standard definition.
Suicide: The act of taking one's own life voluntary and intentionally; self-murder; specifically (Law), the felonious killing of one's self; the deliberate and intentional destruction of one's own life by a person of years of discretion and of sound mind.
Would somebody facing the trauma of being burnt alive be considered of sound mind?
Originally posted by no1maraudermarauder: "I have not accused anybody of anything;"
You continue to be irrational and emotional and have now added the inclusion of your personal vendetta into the discussion.
I have not accused anybody of anything; since I personally don't find suicide morally objectionable in any way, saying someone committed suicide is not an "accusation" to me. But suicide is a word with a definite common ...[text shortened]... ation to make an emotional point. The jumpers here committed suicide by any standard definition.
Oh marauder, please, it is one of your hobbies, also in this thread.
marauder: "The jumpers here committed suicide by any standard definition."
This once again underlines your legalistic way of reasoning.
The terrorists have committed suicide, not their victims.
Originally posted by no1marauderFair enough. I didn't study the footage (in the way you seem to have) as it was too horrifying.
Emotionalism again with the addition of presumptions about the actual circumstances ("flames licking at your face"😉 that do not comport with the actual reality. There was footage in the program and it did not reflect what you are describing.
Originally posted by HalitoseWhy not? Were the firemen who entered the WTC "of sound mind"?
[b]The jumpers here committed suicide by any standard definition.
Suicide: The act of taking one's own life voluntary and intentionally; self-murder; specifically (Law), the felonious killing of one's self; the deliberate and intentional destruction of one's own life by a person of years of discretion and of sound mind.
Would somebody facing the trauma of being burnt alive be considered of sound mind?[/b]
Originally posted by no1marauderI don't believe this !
Emotionalism again with the addition of presumptions about the actual circumstances ("flames licking at your face"😉 that do not comport with the actual reality. There was footage in the program and it did not reflect what you are describing.
Marauder, you are wriggling like a cought eel .... again.
Emotionalism .... unbelievable 🙄
Originally posted by HalitoseIt made me cringe as well. There was a man who was attempting to scale down the buildings from the 90th floor by using his tie or belt and lost his grip and fell to his death. He would not be a suicide.
Fair enough. I didn't study the footage (in the way you seem to have) as it was too horrifying.
Originally posted by no1marauderMarauder, there isn't an ethical problem. You simply made it up in your zeal to try and catch some unwary fundamentalist, but in doing so you are compromising yourself again.
Not yet, although the thread would be more intellectually interesting if other people would not try to change the meaning of the word "suicide" to escape the ethical problem I raised in the first place.
My answer to your question raised in your first post still is "NO" and it will be "NO".